.

Kostka Back in Court, Battle Continues

County judge gives Kosta another month; if nothing changes, a date will be set and the Village of Palatine’s case against Kostka will go to trial.

Four months and five court appearances later, a judge recommended the Village of Palatine’s lawsuit against former councilman, Warrern Kostka go to trial.

“The judge felt the two sides were just too far apart,” Kostka said after the Aug. 24 court hearing.

Even though the two parties , Kostka said it does not look like this case will be resolved without one. “What we’re saying and what they’re saying is just so far apart."

The two parties returned to Cook County Court in Rolling Meadows at 9 a.m. on for a judge to decide if Kostka to have his yard cleaned up.

“This should have been done a long time ago,” Palatine's attorney Patrick Brankin said to a judge in court.

According to court documents from the , a judge ruled that all outstanding violations, except those involving major structural issues on Kostka’s property at 108 N. Forest Avenue must be brought into compliance no later than August 23. Any structural engineer’s report must be completed by August 23.

Exactly one month later, the day after the judge’s deadline, Kostka was back in court Friday morning. “I’ve made it look better,” Kostka said, “All the little unrelated things in the yard have been taken care of.” Still, Kostka admitted several of the alleged violations on his property at 108 N. Forest Avenue have not been fixed. “I’m willing to work with the village,” Kostka said, “But some things can’t be done.”

According to Kostka, his cost — repairs, flood damage, etc. — is in excess of six figures. Kostka said his home is worthless because of structural damage from years of flooding, and he will not invest another cent.

Kostka presented a structural engineer’s report at the Aug. 24 court hearing. “I don’t think they liked what the report said so they belittled it,” Kostka said the report detailed the damages to his home. In his mind, Kostka said the report proved his claim that the Village of Palatine is responsible for the structural damage to his home. However, the engineer’s report did not did cite the cause(s) of the damages to his property. Kostka said, “They snubbed their nose at the engineering report I provided today.” 

: That a federally mandated project to separate Palatine's sanitary sewer and storm water system in the 1980s resulted in more water heading toward Kostka's home at 108 N. Forest Avenue.

The dispute has been over what to do about it, how much fault the village has and how much Kostka's home has actually been damaged by flooding.

With the hope that an engineer could positively identify the cause of the damages to his home, Kostka said he plans to get another structural engineer’s report done before the next court hearing in September. “Those aren’t free either,” said Kostka, “That’s money coming out of my pocket.” The village did not ask for another report but Kostka insisted.

“They’re responsible for what has happened to my house and they’re trying to blame me for what they’ve done,” said Kostka.

 at 108 N. Forest Avenue. In addition to a fine of $500 per day per violation, the village is seeking an injunction to force Kostka to correct the violations and to also pay the cost of the village’s legal fees.

The Village of Palatine claims the home and property at 108 N. Forest Avenue is “in disrepair” because the owner, Kostka failed to maintain it. “According to the village it’s property maintenance,” Kostka said, “They just keep telling me to get things up to code.”

Kostka claims he’s already put thousands of dollars into repairs, “Now, they have the audacity to tell me to bring it up to code and I don’t even want to put a dollar amount on that.”

In January, the village conducted a visual inspection of Kostka’s property and consisting of:

  • Changes to the property's grading that have been done in a manner as to create a nuisance that consist of deep trenches with unstable and hazardous side slopes; sand bags; various spoil piles of dirt, asphalt and concrete remaining on property; fabric fencing; exposed dirt areas with no permanent or temporary vegetative cover.
  • Missing sections of siding, gutters and downspouts, handrails and guardrails.
  • Broken pane of glass in the south elevation window.
  • Driveway in disrepair.
  • Wood boards lying on the roof.

At the a judge said the village would dismiss the case if Kostka addressed the property violations. Progress was then made at the , Palatine and Kostka reached an agreement regarding . Kostka has since addressed some non-structural issues on his property, such as filling the trenches, trimming the tall grass and weeds and removing the fabric fencing and the asphalt and concrete slabs.

The village and Kostka seemed to be working together to set up a time frame for complaince but Kostka's home is still not up to code and now the case is back at a standstill. “I don’t agree with anything the village said in there,” a frustrated and shocked Kostka said after Friday’s court hearing.

The two parties will return to Cook County Court on Sept. 29 for the next hearing. If nothing changes by that time and no agreement is made, Kostka said a judge will set a date for a bench trial to begin. 

Jon August 28, 2012 at 12:53 AM
Dear Mr Kostka. Grow up and take responsibility stop you're wining. If I made a mess of my property then I would have to pay to have it cleaned up. The village has offered to Help pay for there part but you just want more. You just keep on taking. Grow up and fix your house!!!!!!
Jim Advance August 30, 2012 at 02:32 PM
I still don't understand Mr Kostka' claims that the Village has caused his problems. I would like to see an itemized list of the repairs which cost him "thousand of dollars".What exactly did you spend "6 figures" doing to that house? The problems listed in the article have nothing to do with flooding but are the cause of the homeowner neglect. Broken windows, missing siding and gutters, misc. crap all of the yard is not structural problems from flooding. Have some respect for yourself and your neighors and clean up your mess.
Skip September 02, 2012 at 07:48 PM
This trash-pit of a house needs to be condemned. Those of us who have to see this garbage heap every day are tired of seeing it. This homeowner has had ample time to clean up this mess. The fact that he is either unable or unwilling to do so reinforces the point that the Village of Palatine needs to get serious about removing him from the property.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »