patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Why Not Teach Science Every Day in Elementary School?

D-15 proposes creating a STEM Academy for select students while its elementary schools alternate between teaching History and Science throughout the year.

 

Eighth-grade students’ academic achievement has a larger impact on their readiness for college by the end of high school then anything that happens academically in today’s high schools. – ACT 

Why isn’t science taught every day in Community Consolidated School District 15’s elementary schools? It shouldn’t be a question of money. The textbooks and skilled teaching staff are already in place. Private schools in the area teach both science and history daily. Why not District 15

As reported earlier this year, the district is exploring the possibility of creating a STEM Academy for select sixth, seventh and eighth grade students. The administration is expected to present its research on best practices in STEM education and a proposal to create an academy to the Board of Education at its Sept. 14meeting.

STEM is commonly defined as preparing students to be competent and skilled in the four disciplines of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. A successful STEM education creates critical thinkers, increases science literacy and is an essential part of 21st century teaching and learning. 

And it should be available to ALL students – not a select few, not in a taxpayer funded public school district charged with delivering a world-class education to its students. 

Seventh and eighth grade students in D-15 do receive instruction in science and history every day as well as reading, writing and mathematics. Its junior highs have fully equipped science labs where students are involved in first-hand exploration and investigation and inquiry skills can be nurtured – for those two years.

But it’s not enough – and results from the eighth grade ACT-aligned EXPLORE science test prove it. Only one-third of D-15 students from the Class of 2011 enrolling in Township High School District 211 are on track to achieve a college-readiness science score on the ACT later in high school.

The EXPORE Science test measures a student’s scientific reasoning skills and their ability to understand scientific information and draw conclusions from it. Not how well they can recall scientific facts or their skills in mathematics or reading.

Naturally, the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) supports the notion that inquiry science must be a basic in the daily curriculum of every elementary school student at every grade level.

In a position statement dating back to 2002, they cite numerous reports highlighting the importance of early experiences in science so that students develop problem-solving skills that empower them to participate in an increasingly scientific and technological world. 

So instead of investing scarce financial resources to establish an academy to serve at most a few hundred students, would it make more sense to teach science every day to every elementary student in D-15?

It could be a good place to start to close the achievement gap among the district’s four junior high schools. Plum Grove Junior High in Rolling Meadows draws the majority of its students from Hunting Ridge, Pleasant Hill and Frank C. Whiteley elementary schools.  Approximately 44 percent of its most recent graduates are on track for college-readiness in science.

Data shows Sundling Junior High second at 32 percent, followed by Carl Sandburg Junior High with roughly 29 percent and Winston Campus Junior High at about 23 percent. Only Carl Sandburg students enrolling in a D-211 school were included in the results. 

It is true that science benchmarks are higher on the EXPLORE and ACT tests because only a small percentage of college students take a science course in their first year of college. It is also true that the majority of those students are enrolled in math and science related degrees.

Should D-15 be concerned that its students are not meeting this benchmark?

How many of its graduates are prepared to take advantage of accelerated and Advanced Placement science classes in high school? How many then go on to enroll in math and science related degrees in college? Would there be more if science was taught every day in every elementary school?

Perhaps this was a topic discussed by the Board of Education and administration at its retreat this week. Maybe strengthening the science curriculum for all students will become a reality in D-15.

What are your thoughts on the subject?

About this column: Jennifer Mondy has lived in the Palatine area for more than 27 years. She writes a regular column about education issues in Palatine. Mondy has written for Spotlight on the Board since 2006, a web site dedicated to coverage of Community Consolidated School District 15. Mondy also is newsletter chairperson for the Northwest Suburban Council PTA and an independent consultant for The Big Deal Books, publications that contain resources for various audiences in the education market. Mondy has been active in education issues and was among those who circulated petitions regarding District 15's bond issue. Related Topics: D-15, District 15, and Mondy

Vicki Wilson

7:23 am on Friday, August 19, 2011

Thank you for shining the light on this issue of which many people are unaware. It makes no sense why we would spend even one dime on a STEM academy unless and until we are already providing the basics to all current D15 students. How many kids will benefit from STEM? My son was in 5th last year in D15 and alternated between science and social studies/history during the year. They spent about a month or so on one subject and then flipped back to the other. Even though there is plenty of time during the day to teach 4 core subjects (math, reading, science, social studies/history.) There is much wasted time during the day: silent reading time for kids who are already reading above grade level, time given to do homework - isn't it called HOMEwork for a reason?, time for non-educational activities, and non-educational movies. In a 6 1/2 hour school day, the students are only taught 3 core subjects. The new school I am transferring my kids to teaches 5 subjects every day and the length of the school day is the SAME.

Reply

Norma Holmes

11:16 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Given the recent news reports on NBC Nightly News there are Hundreds of jobs available at companies needing people skilled in Engineering areas. Math, Science, and critical thinking are necessary in this area. Since it has taken us 11 years into the 21st century to come to the same realization that Europe and Asia have been aware of for Decades - Why a specialized Academy ? More tax dollars for the smallest percentage of students who are already achieving above standards where they are in school. Meanwhile the middle of the road students (many who blossom when they reach mid-to-late 20's, without any basic skills in those scientific areas) don't get exposed to those same opportunities . . . WHY ? There are many students in that "middle" group who fall through the "cracks" during high school. They have great minds and potential - just not given the same opportunities. How about we "save" some of those children and give them a chance to make a Big Difference in our world as adults? I'm so tired of hearing about "SCORES" ! Colleges also want to hear about the WHOLE student - not just test numbers ! Let's start producing a MAJORITY of students who can think critically, produce math and science projects that will make a difference in their world, and be good citizens ! The whole Upper Education world has gotten completely out of control - similar to our government. Let's devote the hours necessary to our childrens' education - they only get one chance!

Reply

Nichole Jones

8:38 am on Sunday, August 21, 2011

Math is inevitable, but our students are more likely to avoid math and thus they are not able to compete with the international students. They are lagging behind. I have recently found and bought tutorteddy math curriculum for my daughter. They have used the techniques that have been around for last 100 years, they use the similar curriculum used by Thomas Edison and other American inventors. The curriculum is cheap and reusable.

Reply

edmund

9:08 am on Friday, September 16, 2011

Societal problem. Most food is a joke at best. Most small children not taught to read by pre school. Most homes have no discipline just video games and TV. Therefore, most Americans grow up stupid. Stupid parents want them to be "happy" at school and wonder why the kids turn out dumb. Then the stupid administrators get mad because test scores are too low. Then, if a student does well but is not "happy" the dumb administrator still gets mad.

Don't believe the American propaganda that grains are good for you. We are just turning ourselves into a bunch of fat lazy idiots. Grains spike blood sugar worse than pure sugar, and have many horrid effects. Read Dr. William Davis Heart Scan Blog.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Catherine

12:47 pm on Monday, September 19, 2011

And this comment relates to the article, how?

Leave a comment