Palatine Pro-Life Group Out Of Parade Over Banner
The Palatine Area Catholics Respect Life Group were denied participation in the July 2 Hometown Fest parade after refusing to change a banner that included a picture of a live fetus.
A pro-life group is out of the Hometown Fest July 2 parade after refusing to drop a banner that included a picture of a live fetus.
"They decided that an unborn baby is too offensive," said Martin Kelley, co-founder of Palatine Area Catholics Respect Life. "It's an ultrasound photo. It's not a picture of an aborted baby."
The banner also includes a photo of an elderly woman.
Hometown Fest is organized by the Palatine Jaycees, a private organization. Jaycees officials said the pro-life group was rejected because they refused to work with parade organizers, not because of their message.
"The Respect Life Group was denied participation in the Hometown Fest parade
because [they] refused to work with festival organizers regarding their display materials," the Jaycees said in a prepared statement. "Unlike other groups who fully cooperate regarding display materials, the Respect Life Group refused to make any changes to the banner or even have a discussion about it."
Jaycees officials said that if the group dropped the banner, they might still be able to march in the parade. So far, there are about 80 entrants in the parade. The Jaycees do not receive funds from the village to organize Hometown Fest, although the village supports the parade by providing police officers for crowd control.
Jaycees public relations chairman Bill Pohlman said festival organizers have a fine line to walk when it comes to parades and politics.
"What is offensive is subjective," said Pohlman, who also is an unpaid blogger on Palatine Patch. "Everyone's trying to promote their message. What crosses the line? The event organizers felt this crossed the line."
The Jaycees are a nonprofit, leadership training organization for 21 to 40 year olds. The nonpartisan, international organization seeks to develop community leaders through activities such as Hometown Fest.
Kelley was a Jaycees member until the banner issue and has resigned from the organization. He said changing the banner was not an option.
"It's a stand on principle," Kelley said. "[Catholics] believe that life begins at conception. It kind of defeats the purpose to have a newborn baby or a three-year old. It was necessary for our message."
Kelley said the banner was used in last year's Hometown Fest parade. In a mass e-mail, Kelley asserted politics was behind the decision, blaming Jaycees President Chrissy Trilling-Raices for it.
Kelley stated while a picture of an unborn baby was deemed inappropriate, the Jaycees are allowing "Parents and Families of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) to walk in the parade. Apparently she (Trilling-Raices) does not feel that it is inappropriate to subject families to have to explain to their young children about homosexuality. We believe this is a double-standard with the attempt to silence the pro-life message."
Pohlman said Trilling-Raices did not make the decision to reject the parade application. He said the decision was discussed and made by the Jaycees board and the event chairman.
Pohlman said there have been issues with materials other groups intended to hand out or display, however, those groups worked with the Jaycees.
"[Parade organizers] made suggestions, but they [Palatine Area Catholics Respect Life] refused to bend in any way, shape or form," Pohlman said.
Camille
4:45 pm on Monday, June 13, 2011
Not sure why an ultrasound of a baby is offensive. Can the Jaycees explain that? Every time I see one I think it's amazing and beautiful.
Kathy O.
6:14 pm on Monday, June 20, 2011
Ellen, how many people did you just offend by calling God "a magical man in the sky who impregnated a married woman and then claimed he didn't have sex." Sounds like another double standard to me. You don't want to see/hear something you find subjectively offensive yet turn around and make a statement such as that. This isn't about religion, so I don't know why you feel the right to attack religion. Your attempts to justify your responses are ludicrous. Don't get me wrong, you have freedom or or from religion. That is your right and I respect it, but, please in the future...stop being such a hypocrite and think about other's points of view besides your own. Everyone has an opinion, it doesn't make yours better or worse.
Kathy O.
5:57 pm on Monday, June 13, 2011
I likewise see nothing offensive about an ultrasound of a living baby and see no reason to elminate that picture. What could the Jaycees possibly have found to offensive in that picture or the banner which I believe has been used in prior year, Scott, you never said.
Furthermore, I am disgusted in any type of censorship, even if you are prochoice, you don't have a right to silence others. If that is what it comes down to, the Jaycees should deny entrance to any group that anyone in Palatine may find offensive, which they are not. You cannot discriminate.
Ellen
1:35 pm on Friday, June 17, 2011
Kathy,
Are there other groups in the parade that are you find offensive?
Kathy O.
6:33 pm on Monday, June 20, 2011
I don't find any of the groups offensive. However, if the Jaycees want to play fairly, they must realize that someone in Palatine can find offense in a few groups. Why are you just targeting the one that makes you, subjectively, mad the most?
Kathy O.
7:32 pm on Monday, June 13, 2011
Keep it up, Jack, you proove our point. My husband, children, and I are getting a loud laugh from your postings. Prayers are now being offered up for you and your hatred. Hopefully, you can start the healing process for whatever happened to you as a child/young adult. This is my last post as I am off to enjoy the rest of my night with my family. Peace out!
CGS
7:37 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
I agree the hilarity of Jack and Dave is amazing. CRAZY comes to mind. I don't even need to comment about Jack because his statements are so off the wall. But has Dave met a Catholic? Or walked into a HOPE clinic where they not only save the baby, but take care of mother and baby long after birth. If you don't like murder, then don't murder, what an awesome logic!! But you over there go ahead and murder, that's your choice:) What BS.
Regular Joe
10:23 pm on Monday, June 13, 2011
Jack/Dave, anti Catholic feelings showing through? Hate much? It's funny how people like you can't make a point without stooping to name calling. Do you "guys" even live in Palatine? Doubt it. Go back to your miserable self centered secular lives and pretend like your opinions matter. Because in the end your hateful, mis-informed rants won't do a thing to change the opinions of those who are clearly more intelligent, and more loved, than you.
Dan C
11:46 pm on Monday, June 13, 2011
Wow I love when the pro-lifers come out for a discussion...I'm Catholic myself and find that Pro-Lifers an odd bunch. I believe that though it may be a sin in God's eyes, it IS legal to have an abortion in the USA. If you don't like it don't have one. The people that choose to do so have to live it with and I doubt they just come upon it one day of jeez what should I do today? oh yeah get that abortion! I never hear pro-lifers sticking up for all the people on Death Row....why is that? Because they prefer to pick and choose from the Bible what they want. If I followed everything that the Bible stated and took it for literal truth, I could stone my wife today w/ no repercussions. I prefer the more Christian way of loving my fellow brothers and sisters....and turning the other cheek.
Regular Joe
7:32 am on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Dan, I got news for you: your not Catholic. If you were you would have a problem with abortion. just becasue you go to church 3 times a year and were baptized Catholic, doesn't mean you are Catholic. Who you kidding?
CGS
7:24 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Um, yeah Dan, I have to agree with Joe. You're not Catholic. And that is okay, but please don't call yourself one when you don't stand up for the Doctrine of the church. The church says abortion is wrong because it is murder and so that ridiculous statement of "don't have one yourself" holds no water. By your logic, if it is against God because it is murder,then you should stand against it if you believe in God. Just because something is legal doesn't make it right. Either it is murder or it isn't. The church says it is, and if you are Catholic you stand up for the innocent. By the way most Catholics I know are against the death penalty too even though doctrine allows for it in certain circumstances.
crowepps
1:24 am on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Why are they using a fetus developed way past the point at which abortion is actually legal without extraordinary circumstances to illustrate 'conception' ? I mean, aside from the fact that this particular image looks like a scary alien from a horror movie, wouldn't it be more accurate to use an image of a blastocyst? Or a pharyngula?
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/imagepages/9578.htm
CGS
7:29 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
What planet are you living on? Abortion is legal up until the day you deliver for any reason what so ever. Doe V Bolton insured that. There is a ban on partial birth abortion where part of the baby is born first and then his skull is crushed, but late term abortion is legal in most states except a select few that have recently passed bans. Also that NIH picture of a 3.5 week fetus would be before she even knows she is pregnant, she hasn't even missed a period at that point. Seriously dude, read some facts on this issue. Abortion rips apart a baby limb from limb and you can have one for any reason at any stage of pregnany. As for the banner, what is offensive about that? Millions of parents share these ultrasounds with their children so they can see their new sibling. It is basically a science picture. As for the anti-Catholic folk, wow such haters. I know plenty of people, mostly devout Catholics who not only strive to protect the unborn, they keep helping long long after the baby is born. Life is such a beautiful gift, yet we send the message to women that they are too weak and can't handle it, just kill your baby. We tell them to choose evil to help them avoid suffering, but most I know suffered more in the long run after the abortion. Never met one person who regretted their child.
Jeffrey J.
8:35 am on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
This issue has nothing to do with the message or the beliefs of the organizations involved. It has to do with an image that some people might find offensive in a family oriented parade.
The assertion that the banner was sanctioned in last year's parade is patently false. I was there and the group was informed that they could not have a picture of a fetus on the banner (well before the parade). They waited until the parade organizer passed by there contingent and confirmed they were complying, then they unrolled the banner. By the time it came to the attention of the parade organizers, they were too far away and the parade was under way.
Let me be clear: The banner was NOT approved last year. The group surreptitiously brought it to the parade and displayed it after the parade organizers had passed them by.
Sharon
9:50 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Jeffrey, you are correct. Last year the group agreed not to display the banner and then did after the parade was underway. Lisa Moran and Marty Kelly were the individuals that headed this group last year and did not hold to the agreement and therefore cannot be trusted this year. They were very loud last year about not being in the parade and then when allowed, they violated the terms of the agreement.
On another note, while I am a born, raised and practicing Catholic, I do not beleive the Independance parade is for those type of groups. Pro-life or pro-choice. That is a moral choice, not a political one. They need to stay out.
Regular Joe
10:04 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Sharon, you don't know what your talking about. The banner was approved and displayed from the start of the parade until the finish. And, what "terms of what agreement" are you referring to? Not to display a banner?
So would "those types of groups" include PFLAG? by your definiton only political groups should be allowed in the parade. Than kick out the Church Groups, the Cub Scouts, and all the rest too.
Patricia
10:20 am on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
I recall meeting a woman many years ago (30 or so) back when we were more responsible and concerned about human life, who had been a British nurse. I asked her why she had come to live in the United States. She said she could not stomach aborting live babies and watching them squirm and die after they were removed from the womb. So she came here.
Hopefully she is no longer around...or working at a grocery store or something. We've come a long way haven't we???
Ellen
2:05 pm on Friday, June 17, 2011
Patricia,
Well, I recall living with a young woman in the late 60s who almost died from her second attempt at an illegal abortion on the same pregnance. I came home from work to find her squirming and dying and afraid to call for help. She almost died.
Don't know where your nurse friend was that she was watching squirming babies but in the USA, last I knew it was a vacuuming procedure and I don't know of anyone who was ever expected to look at this waste material.
I have had a miscarriage at 6 weeks and I had to take the waste material to a doctor to determine if it was a miscarriage or just a large blod clot.
I think you're doing what so many anti-freedom, anti-choice, anti-american, faux God crusaders do -- which is to lie to further your cause.
M
1:38 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
I find it very interesting that folks are saying the decision to deny this group was "anti-catholic." It is interesting because the Jaycees allow the Knights of Columbus, multiple churches, a variety of politicians, and children athletes from a multitude of sports (how dare they allow those football players!). The knights of Columbus have been part of the parade for many years and we have never had an issue with their group or their beliefs. Jeffrey is correct that there is misleading information about the approval of last year's banner. More research would have been helpful (i.e contacting the parade chairs of 2010).
I am also completely disgusted with any group purporting to "respect life" and denouncing the entrance of the PFLAG group. This group is all about tolerance and respect for others.
Regular Joe
4:43 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Unlike the Palatine JC's who have no tolerance for a Pro Life/Pro Family Group..................Can you say
"hypocrite"
M
10:45 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Hmmm...I don't know if you can say the Jaycees have no tolerance for pro-life/pro-family. If you check the roster of the parade, you will see the Knights of Columbus as well as other churches. Are you insinuating that these groups are not pro-life? I think the Jaycees and the decisions they have made are nothing but tolerant for all!
Pete
2:10 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Excellent Points M!! The Respect Life Group is excellent at twisting the story and spreading falsities about the Jaycees. The 2010 Chairs had much difficulty with this group last year, as they used Palatine Township Clerk, Lisa Moran as their voice. From what I understand, she used her position as an opportunity to intimidate the 2010 Parade and Fest Chairs. The Respect Life Group was not refused admission to the parade, but were simply told that the banner could not be accepted. The same banner that the 2010 Chairs had requested NOT be carried in the 2010 parade. Additionally, what Kelley had failed to inform everyone, is that the President of the Palatine Jaycees did not, nor cannot, make any decisions regarding entries into the parade. Those decisions are made by the Parade and the Overall Fest Chairs. Maybe Kelley’s true goal is to slander the name of an outstanding President of an community organization.
Veteran
2:36 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
First question for everyone opposed to banning this group, have you ever volunteered to help the Jaycees with the Parade? If not perhaps you should, then you would see the amazing level of criticism they endure to bring the Parade to you. I know I was involved with the Wheaton Jaycees Parade for over 10 years. If they were asked to leave the banner out, then that is what this group does or they do not march. Groups tend to forget the reason for this day is to celebrate the 4th of July as a country not to make a personal or political statement, and anything that does will not be allowed. We had PFLAG in our parade as well and when we asked them not to carry certain things they obliged, other groups did the same. I could tell you some funny and not so funny stories about abuse we all took from groups on different sides of every issue there is. My advice is dump the banner, march in the parade, and celebrate the fact we are all Americans.
T
2:49 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Excellent point. The emotion attached to this issue is getting in the way of the heart of the matter - if you want to get your message out, then march..
John Klika
2:40 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
What makes the ‘Pro-Lifers’ an odd lot? Is it because they believe life is sacred. You allude to being Christian. If you are a Christian (whether Catholic or Protestant), and even if you’re not, I would think that the words of our founding fathers would mean something to you (”..all men … are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”). The fundamental right of ‘life’ is a prerequisite for all those other ‘rights’ that follow. Without life, all the others are moot.
We, as citizens have the right to free speech, expression of our beliefs. We, as a nation, are made up of Pro-Choice advocates, Pro-Life advocates, pro Gay Rights, anti Gay Rights, anti-war, anti-Death penalty, Animal rights, etc, etc. The list goes on. We, as a nation, are provided with the right (and duty) to participate in the law making process. That includes expressing our beliefs, trying to inform, discuss, and persuade the other citizens of the various issues which affect us as a nation.
Ellen
2:15 pm on Friday, June 17, 2011
JohnK
All men are created equal etc once they are born and can breathe on their own.
But the law says abortion is legal. So shouldn't we also be respecting the laws?
M
2:48 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Pete - thanks for the compliment! I am glad you finally brought up some issues from last year that have not been publicized (i.e. township officials using their position to jockey for better treatment).
Veteran - EXCELLENT post!!!! As a fellow parade volunteer, I know exactly what you are talking about and I completely agree.
John - who are you responding to? It's a little vague. I fully agree with your second paragraph. We tried to uphold the exact things you express, but received nothing but grief, harrassment, and headaches from this group last year! I am all about free expression, but when you bully VOLUNTEERS, you should not be welcome.
jules
9:42 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
M- who is bullying who? Please clarify- and provide the evidence to back up your claim.
sue mcpherrin
7:39 pm on Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Americans have high-tech infactuation. Just look at our cameras, cellphones, computers, HD TV's and 3 d movies, etc... and of course this technology extends into the medical field. Laser eye surgery is high tech and the procedure (now over 10 years old) is not for the squeamish. In shopping malls, passersby can watch the surgeries -- intended to correct nearsightedness and farsightedness -- live on a television screen. Families who casually stroll can view the cornea sliced and peeled back, exposing the area beneath... and then zapped with a laser! Doesn't this make those offended by the Respect Life banner displaying a 3 d photo image of a preborn human baby look a bit silly? Is there something about this banner and image that makes it so offensive? And if so, would a different image of a preborn baby be more acceptable? Life is precious in all stages from defenseless pre-born human life until it's natural death--and this is the point of the banner. I suspect some viewers may need more than eye surgery to understand this.
Ellen
2:18 pm on Friday, June 17, 2011
The point of the banner is to tell women who seek a legal abortion that they are murderers.
maria
2:05 am on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Pro choice!!!I don't want anymore of these single moms taking my tax money. Palatine should know-section 8 on rand road, food stamp card, and free insurance and on welfare! PRO CHOICE!!!
jules
9:44 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Oh I see, kill the child because you don't like the parents? What's the mater with you?
jules
9:46 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Oh, I see, kill the child because you don't like the parents? What's the matter with you?
MomO2
6:24 am on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
@ Regular Joe and CGS - Who are the both of you to declare Dan to not be a Catholic? If you so strongly, "...stand up for the Doctrine of the Church...", you most certainly believe in the most fundamental teachings of God, including to admishment to "not judge others, lest you be judged". You say, "...The Church says abortion is wrong because it is murder...", yet Doctrine forbids the use of birth control thus leading to thousands and thousands of unwanted pregnancies. I'd say that the Church needs to find a middle ground somewhere, realize that it's 2011 and adjust some of the ways that it thinks. Possibly then the number of "fallen Catholics" (such as myself) would decrease...
Regular Joe
7:41 am on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
MomO2, so to appease you the Church should say abortion is OK? I see, because you and some other "fallen Catholics", who find it's teachings and core tenets a little too tough for your liking, prefer a faith that is more "middle ground" and easier to follow. What other rules should they relax to get you back? pre-marital sex? extra-marital sex? The Catholic faith, and for that matter all faiths, do not have menu's that you can pick and choose what rules you would like to follow.
Veteran
8:27 am on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Wow you are quite amazing to be able to discern what people really mean from what they write. The church has been trying to prevent pre and extra-marital sex for 2000 years now, how's that working out? Are you saying you follow all the rules in the Bible? So let's see you don't eat shellfish or pork, you have stoned people that have taken the Lord's name in vain, and I certainly hope your children have never disrespected you. Point is if the Church really wanted to reduce the number of abortions they would support contraception, but they don't and that makes them hypocrites
Tom
1:33 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
C'mon, Joe. who are you crappin"? The church has changed their rules more often than most people change their underwear. Heck, Pope just did an about face on condom usage once he was faced with the outrage of billions on this planet for the Catholic church's draconian views. What happended to no meat during Lent? Got changed to no meat on Fridays. Now even that one doesn't apply. What happened to confession? Now it's called "reconciliation" and you don't have to confess before taking communion, as it used to be. Why did the church make these changes? To appease their audience. Your self-righteous, holier-than-thou attitude disgusts & offends me . Get off your high horse and learn to accept that just because others disagree with you doesn't mean they're wrong.
Regular Joe
6:36 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Uh, Tom, there is a big difference between changing the rules for Lent, changing "Confession" to "Reconcilliation", and seeking a middle ground for those Catholics who find the rules a little too tough to follow. Where will it stop? Let's see, should the Church go from being against abortion (and the death penalty) to being against abortion, most of the time.......or, only when it's really needed. Is that the type of appeasement you want to see?
Tom
7:03 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Sorry, Joe, I'm not buyin it. There is no big difference. My point was, the church amends their rules to suit their purposes. Why should the rules on eating meat have changed at all if it's a core tenet of your faith? They've amended their rules over time to appease their flock & make their rules easier to abide by. I don't want or need to be appeased. I want the church to stop hypocritical. Embrace gays in their flock, allow women priests etc
Chris Humphrey
8:10 am on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
I recommend that anyone in town who is pro-life hold up a sign with the "offensive" picture of an unborn baby, with the words "Respect Life" underneath, and stand on the sidelines.
I suggest that the fact that opponents can't bear the thought of anyone affirming that life is a gift that should not be refused, etc., but instead must have agreement with their views or the suppression of pro-life views, points to a guilty conscience. (And, I submit, the level of anger at what I have just said will confirm my view.)
Veteran
8:40 am on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
I really think you are missing the point Chris; the day is not about political differences it is about celebrating the 4th of July. That is what most groups who organize this event strive for. There are plenty of other places to express your views and 364 other days in the year to do it.
Chris Humphrey
8:48 am on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
OK, granted that it's a 4th of July parade. How about a little reminder that we continue to hold these truths to be self-evident, "that all men . . . are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these" is "Life"? It's great to celebrate Independence Day, but that picture, and those words, bring us back to our patriotic duty: those rights are under attack.
Veteran
9:39 am on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Do you need a reminder? I am not suggesting you turn away from what you think is right, I am suggesting you suspend indulging in displaying it for one day where we can all be on the same page. Is that too much to ask?
Now I don't know you Chris so I don't know your position on all things, but I will submit that I would take the "Pro-Life" movement more seriously if they started marching on companies that deliberately ignore safety and cause the deaths of their employees; or showed up at the execution of someone in prison (to be fair some groups do this). Do you support the “Mexico City Policy” enacted by Ronald Reagan? Do you know what more women and children died due to a lack of these funds for pre and postnatal care than would have potentially been aborted?
Fact is that contraception could with proper education and support eliminate the need for abortion with the exception of very extreme (and beyond a woman’s control) situations. Do you support the use of contraceptives Chris?
jules
10:00 am on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Let's stick to the FACTS folks. The banner used in last year’s parade WAS approved ahead of time and the group has the email correspondence to prove that if anyone is interested in seeing it. I saw them at the start of the parade and observed that the Jaycees saw the banner ahead of time. While a FEW of them objected it was pointed out to them that approval had previously been granted and the group had the email correspondence with them as evidence. The emailed photos were CLEAR and not fuzzy as the Jaycees now claim. The Jaycees President had been president of a pro-abortion group at the University of IL and stated in a book written by Ben Shapiro that she would not give pro-lifers a forum for their "extremist" views. Clearly there is an agenda. I observed the marchers in the parade as I was a member of another group walking nearby and can state for a fact that all along the route they were cheered, received standing ovations and positive responses. There was one point though at which a group of pro-abortion adults became irate and started screaming in front of the children. This scene was one-sided as the pro-lifers did not respond in kind.
Veteran
10:50 am on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Pro-abortion? Sad that you would hate anyone enough to call them that. FACT is that things can change year to year, it happens a lot. You’re assuming that the Jaycees President has an agenda for the 4th of July Parade, while ignoring the church's agenda standing in front of you. Above I posted about the people who are complaining need to volunteer to help the Jaycees with the Parade and see the level of criticism they endure to bring the Parade to the community and try to respect everyone.
M
2:05 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Jules,
I have read the email to which you are referring. Just to clarify, the banner approved last year is not the same banner that the group marched with in the parade. Regardless of what happened last year, the decision for this year was based on many things by the Parade Chairs. I can also affirm that I did not see the banner at any time during the staging of the parade. As a Jaycee volunteer, I was responsible for monitoring the entire staging area. Please don't tell me what you think I did or did not see. That banner was not displayed until after the parade began.
Also, President Chrissy's involvement in certain groups in college has no bearing on this decision whatsoever. How would you feel if people dug up stuff about you ten years ago and plastered it all over the internet? Not very respectful. Has it occurred to you that the cheering and standing ovations were because people were AT A PARADE????? Perhaps it had nothing to do with the group's particular message? Hmmm...interesting. Her only agenda this year is to support the Festival and Parade chairs to provide a community event that everyone can HAVE FUN at.
Scott
10:32 am on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Jules - please post the email including the sender info.
jules
10:00 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Scott, you'll have to contact the respect life people, the email is not mine, but my guess is that they would be more than happy to show it to you to prove their point.
Tom
1:17 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Just because I don't blindly follow every doctrine of the church doesn't mean I'm not a Catholic. I went to Catholic grammar school...was an altar boy for 5 years. I'm as Catholic as the next guy. But I don't agree with the church on the right to life issue. Let me qualify that....I believe abortion is wrong and I wouldn't encourage my partner to have one. But I also realize that it is a right in this country and I don't believe pro-life orgs should try to introduce legislation to outlaw the practice. Do we really want to go back to the days of hack "doctors" performing back alley procedures with a coat hanger? I'm a Knight...and we've got a couple guys in our council who are rabidly anti-abortion. Notice I don't say pro-life...because they're not...they're anti-abortion. I never hear or see these guys offering to take the unwanted children of a pregnant teenager. And, in this case, their hypocrasy is exposed. Why would a good Catholic object to including the parents & friends of gays in the parade? Because most Catholics hate gays. The parents and friends of gays may not be gay themselves. Why ostracize them? Final point...would it have been a bad thing if Hitler's mother had an abortion?
Regular Joe
9:22 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Tom, let me ask you a question: why would a good Catholic, such as yourself, object to a Pro Life group marching in the parade? Because, if I use your idiotic generalization ("most Catholics hate gays") then most people such as yourself (whatever you are) hate babies. I'm sure the Knights would be proud of your statement, why don't you share it with them.
jules
11:24 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Tom, you state you're as "Catholic as the next guy"? Hmm exactly what does that mean? You don't believe everything the Church teaches, so you're really a "cafeteria Catholic" who picks and chooses what to believe, I believe that really makes you more of a Protestant- Christian than a Catholic-Christian. I agree with Regular Joe- I'm sure the K of C would be interested in our statements especially that you wouldn't encourage your "partner" to have an abortion. Frankly I don't believe you are a Catholic or ever have been one and I seriously doubt you are a K of C and bet you couldn't even name the council you're allegedly with. Thought you could fool people by claiming you’re a Catholic but pro-choice. Sorry you didn’t fool anyone.
Tom
8:52 am on Thursday, June 16, 2011
Love babies...have two children that are the light of my life. I'm not fabricating my life as a Catholic nor my affiliations. Just can't converse intelligently with people who are so locked into their mindset that they can't even entertain the notion of a middle ground. I"m sure God is very pleased with your forgiving, compassionate nature. Seems you only love unborn children and have no regard for the feelings of the self-aware, living, breathing individuals with whom you share this Earth. Good luck, guys.
PalRes
1:55 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Jules, let's stick with the FACTS then. The banner that was approved was NOT the banner that was carried in the Palatine Parade. The banner that was approved said Arlington Heights Catholics Respect Life and the one that was carried in Palatine said Palatine Area Catholics Respect Life. The picture that was submitted was NOT the picture that was used on the Palatine. That is a FACT. The Respect Life group keeps saying that the Palatine Jaycees are bad people but what has the Respect Life group done for the Palatine Community?? I know for a FACT that the Jaycees have given tens of thousands of dollars to Palatine community organizations. One of the organizations that we have given to is the Palatine Township where Lisa Moran is the elected Town Clerk and is the co-founder of the Respect Life group. The Palatine Township actually collects can goods before the parade starts. I think the Palatine Jaycees should not give anymore donations to the Township. How does she and her co-workers feel about that? We are such bad people according to this group why would they want our volunteer, hard earned donations? The Parade and Festival theme is “Hometown Fest”. The Jaycees want to promote the hometown feel of Palatine, reflecting on what makes it a great place to live. How does their group make Palatine a great place to live? If you want to have a parade about Pro Life then have had it, obtain a permit like the Jaycees did and march. Don't hide behind the Jaycees!!
Regular Joe
6:18 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Boy, that makes a lot of sense: Let's not provide donations to that help the poorer and less well off people of our community and show them how angry we are! Is that what the Palatine JAycees are all about? No wonder why the JAycees have a black eye over this.
jules
12:10 am on Thursday, June 16, 2011
Palres- Hmmmm so they would approve of using the AH banner in the parade- why didn’t they just tell the Palatine group this? That seems to be a reasonable solution to this “problem”. Seems rather silly to me that the Jaycees would approve for inclusion in the PALATINE parade, a banner from ARLINGTON HEIGHTS that contained a photo of an unborn child and elderly person and then would try to refuse a banner from PALATINE that contained a picture of an unborn child and an elderly person. Please explain this logic.
jules
12:18 am on Thursday, June 16, 2011
PalRes: you ask what the respect life group has done for the community, have you bothered to ask them directly or are you just making an assumption that they do nothing? I know some of the people who walked with them last year and I can state emphatically that they donate a lot of money and time to the needy- unfortunately you are judging them without knowing anything about them. Just the fact that you mentioned that Lisa Moran a founder of the group works for the Township speaks volumes about her dedication to those in need. As much good as the Jaycees does, it is nothing compared to what the Township does for the community.
M
2:26 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Well said, PalRes!!!
I think you can also remind the reading public about the three annual scholarship winners, the holiday shopping spree which we donated $10,000 to needy families, as well as our community donations program which consistenly gives funds to individuals and organizations in Palatine (including PHD).
Oh wait, we also put on a huge annual festival in which thousands of people attend. The fireworks, entertainment, carnivals, and other events are all provided by Jaycee time and resources.
Kris
4:17 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
I still don't see how a picture of a living, unborn baby is offensive??
Jeffrey J.
6:25 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
The solution is for this group to spend their own money and manpower to hold their own parade.
The Jaycees selflessly do a great deal for the Palatine community and a single radical group is trying to make them look like villains. That is what is wrong.
The only issue to discuss is the banner not the message and the group is completely refusing to even work with the Jaycees.
You have absolutely no idea how much work goes into putting on the festival and parade.
Black eye? You are ignorant.
Regular Joe
9:02 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
So this "Single radical group" has made a concerted effort to make the Jaycees look bad; and just how have they done that?
And, for the record, what you are saying is that if the Pro LIfe People changed their banner, you would let them in, no questions asked?
M
7:20 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Joe, how do the Jaycees have a black eye over this? Your comment makes no sense fyi.
Jeffrey, I completely agree. :)
Regular Joe
9:14 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
People such as PalRes, a supporter (member) of the Jaycees are advocating withholding donations to the Township as punishment for ..........something (I am not even sure what the township has to do with this). The Township, if I am correct, helps out needy people in the community. You, a member of the JAycees, are in full support of that. Help me understand how that makes the Jaycees look good, please.
J
9:34 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
M, Lisa Moran has used her election position in the Palatine Township to strong arm the Palatine Jaycees. Has Palatine Township reached out to the Jaycees to indicate they do not condone nor approve of the use of Lisa Moran's Board Position Title in conjunction with the parade entry? I have not been able to locate an official statement from the Township, nor Linda Fleming. It would seem that the Township, and organization that has accepted numerous donations from the Palatine Jaycees, would at least acknowledge that their board is not associated with this complaint against the Jaycees. Silence speaks volumes. Seems that the Township lacks respect or gratitude for the Jaycees.
Regular Joe
9:53 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
I don't believe you will get one either because the Township has nothing to do with this. And, as far as I know, doesn't the Township march in the parade? Why don't you ban them too.
And as far as strong arming, what strong arm tactics are you referring to? The evidence, please.
J
10:01 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
It has been said that while contacting the Jaycees regarding the parade entries, Lisa Moran presented herself as the Clerk for the Township, and not as a Respect Life representative. If I was a Township Board member, this would concern me, as she is representing them.
casey
6:09 pm on Thursday, June 16, 2011
Hey J-
Said by whom? It's evident that it’s nothing but hearsay- if you don't know something for a fact- didn't hear it or see it for yourself, it’s not worth repeating, and it just makes a person look silly to state something as fact, that they have no proof is indeed fact.
Regular Joe
10:10 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
That's good, the "it has been said" evidence. I would like to hear from Mr. "It has been said"
And even if this did occur, how exactly does that constitute "bullying and strong arming".
Sharon
10:13 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
PalRes, you are correct, they used a completly different banner than approved. I agree with the Jaycees. You don't want to follow thier rules, then you are out. It was my understanding they were even investigating criminal Disturbing the Peace charges against the group because people watching the parade found the sign offensive. Also, understand that Lisa Moran is only the Clerk at the township and does not represent the dedicated and hard working respecful people employed there. The township has nothing to do with this group and it will stay that way. It is very unfortunate she has brought negativity to the Township with this issue.
To J: Lisa Moran was elected by the people of Palatine Township and the board has no authority to change that. It is up to the voters in 2013.
casey
5:31 pm on Thursday, June 16, 2011
Sharon, I met Lisa Moran when she assisted someone I know who was in need and she is a hard working and dedicated public servant, no less so than the other Township elected officials including you. If you take the time to get to know her, you will realize that she is not the bullying type. If the Jaycees felt "strong -armed" by her- it doesn't say much for them. I am not sure what your agenda is (other than a possible challenge to her in the next election?) or the Jaycees agenda but this is a most ridiculous action on the part of the Jaycees. As a past supporter I will find an agency that believes in the freedoms we hold dear, to receive the cash that I used to send to the Jaycees.
Ellen
2:22 pm on Thursday, June 16, 2011
All this back and forth pro-life, pro-choice, pro-abortion, name calling is proof in and of itself that this entire issue doesn't belong in the July 4th parade.
Ellen
5:36 pm on Thursday, June 16, 2011
Casey,
Freedom of religion also includes freedom from religion.
But go ahead and pout if it makes you feel better. You are free to do that as well in this great country.
casey
12:05 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011
Ellen said:" Don't know where your nurse friend was that she was watching squirming babies but in the USA, last I knew it was a vacuuming procedure and I don't know of anyone who was ever expected to look at this waste material."
This statement is a perfect example of the ignorance of pro-aborts when spout off without knowing even the basic facts about abortion. There are half a dozen different ways of aborting babies, with suction being only one type. Obviously if abortion is legal all nine months, which it is, you can't suction an 8 1/2 month fetus. I would suggest that anyone like this uninformed poster who really wants to educate themselves on the issue, view "Meet the Abortion Providers"- former abortionists who will explain in detail all of the options legally available for disposing of a living pre-born human baby as if it were trash. Priests for Life also have educational material available. They are but two of many websites with FACTUAL information and photos for anyone who has the courage to face the reality of this issue. I know former abortion staff members personally, and YES, clinic staff IS required to examine the remains of the suction procedure to make sure that all of the arms, legs, ribs etc are accounted for, to prevent infection from retained fetal parts in the woman. In a miscarriage sometimes the baby wasn't completely formed as apparently in your case. Educate yourself please so you don’t look ridiculous making absurd statements.
Ellen
12:35 pm on Sunday, June 26, 2011
There is no such thing as a pro-abort. The usage of this term is an instant indication of a radical agenda.
I see Casey is still using me to spread his or her crap -- even after being asked not to many times over .
This article is about the Jaycees having the right to refuse a group that won't follow the rules. Casey seems to have quite a problem following any rules or showing any respect for anyone who has an opinion that is not the same as his.
Casey, Stop using my name to spread your radical, religious beliefs. There is no magic man in the sky just as there is no nurse you are using to attempt to make your fanatical case against the freedom we have in the USA to make choices.
You COULD just keep posting your garbage without using my name but, just like those catholics who allegedly respect life, you chose to be divisive and disrespectful.
Ami
11:53 am on Monday, June 27, 2011
I just want to say thank you to the Jaycees for all you do for the community- I am very thankful for all of your time and efforts!