How Can the Route 53 Extension be Funded?

On the books for decades, could the Route 53 extension be any closer to reality? How do you propose it is paid for?

Talk about the Route 53 extension has extended into decades.

The plan, which will extend Route 53 from Lake Cook Road to Highway 120 in Lake County, has the support of local governments, transportation agencies and the general public.

However, opponents continue to question how it will be funded.

The Blue Ribbon Advisory Council recently presented a report to the Illinois Tollway Authority Board, and in May the council, which is co-chaired by Lake County Board Chairman David Stolman of Buffalo Grove and civic leader George Ranney, president and CEO of Metropolis Strategies,  

The Council stated that a four-lane, limited access, tolled parkway should be built. With a price tag estimated at $1.9 billion to $2.5 billion as reported by the Chicago Tribune, the Council said the extension would be paid for through tolls, local revenue sources and other options. It would be developed in coordination with local governments.

"The funding will be a challenge," said Pat Carey of the Lake County Board. "It's not completley impossible if all the sources aligned, but it's going to be tough."

"All of the players - the Tollway Authority, the Pace and Metra systems, the counties and all the local goverments have to be together on this from the beginning or the funding won't be there," agreed Greg Koeppen, Director of the Lake County Farm Bureau who was recently appointed Vice Chairman to the Regional Citizens Advisory Board for the Regional Transportation Authority.

Koeppen believes Route 53 would have to be a user-fee based system to actually work. "There has to be that understanding that residents who use the road may have to pay for it," he said.

"The bulk of the money could come from the Tollway Authority through tolls, but not necessarily just from the new portion," said Carey. "I think it's reasonable to add tolls to the existing Route 53 also."

This is where the opposition lies. Bill Morris, a resident of Grayslake and a former member of the Illinois Tollway Authority Board, said having a suggested 20 cent toll wouldn't be fair.

"The working class who live in Lake County would have to pay more just to get to work everyday," Morris said. "I can't imagine families able to pay $5 a day on tolls. It's not right."

"No one likes traffic but it costs money to fix that," said Morris, a former State Senator and former Mayor of Waukegan. "There is limited money available, the state is broke, and we need a solution. It's just reality that the solution is not Route 53."

Morris said instead of spending more time planning the Route 53 extension, local officials should consider other ways to alleviate the traffic demands in and out of Lake County. He suggests making the section of Highway 120 from Wildwood to Route 45 a four lane road, widening Route 45 up to Grand Avenue and beyond, and a Route 45 bypass in the Millburn.

"If we don't build it you can see the businesses leaving the area," Koeppen said. "Who wants to have their employees be stuck in such traffic all the time. And if the businesses leave, it will ultimately raise property taxes."

"I think it's important for the people to be able to say whether its going to happen or not going to happen." Carey said, "We need to make a decsion in the next five years, or sooner, one way or the other."

Lake County and several surrounding villages and city councils, including the Village of Buffalo Grove which passed a resolution just weeks ago are in support of the project. And, in a 2009 county-wide referendum, 76 percent of voters favored extending Illinois Route 53. The project is also included in Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning’s  GO TO 2040 comprehensive regional plan.

Would you be willing to pay a toll to use the road? Where do you propose the funding come from to build it?

Log in to Patch, and let us know.

Maria Graham July 15, 2012 at 04:15 PM
If they turn Route 53 into a toll way then I would never use it again. You don't turn a freeway designed to get people to and from work easier into a money grabbing business. 53 has always been a freeway and i'm sure that a good percent of people would agree that yes 53 can and needs to be extended but you don't penalize the consumers who will be using the road with tolls on a road that is ment to be free of charge. I'm sure there are other ways to fund the plan. I know personally that if they did that I would find other ways to get to work. I'm sure that a lot of other people would be the same way which would cause a whole bunch more traffic on local side streets causing more congestion and accidents etc. So don't turn 53 into a toll way
Hugh Gallagher July 15, 2012 at 06:59 PM
I-355 was built and is tolled, leaving #53 as is. Do the same with the north extension.
Joemama July 16, 2012 at 05:38 PM
Well put I have used both 355 and the old 53 to get to places south of Palatine. This seem like the best way to go.
Cassandra O'Brien July 22, 2012 at 06:34 PM
Tolling shouldn't be the solution from the get-go. We need to proactively find funding.
hongfeng January 09, 2013 at 04:15 AM
http://www.coachoutletonlinebfd.com/ Coach Outlet Online http://www.guccibeltstb.com/ Gucci Belt http://www.coachoutletonlineste.com/ Coach Outlet Store Online http://www.cocoachoutletonline.org/ Coach Outlet Online http://www.coachoutletonlinetsy.net/ Coach Online Outlet


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »