patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

When School District Finances are Upside Down

Something has to give when salaries and benefits outpace revenue growth

 

Just as the House always wins in Vegas, school districts can’t lose when it comes to collecting property taxes.  

If your neighbor's home goes into foreclosure, the bank continues to pay the taxes. If a homeowner or business appeals their assessment and receives a reduction, the rest of the taxpayers make up the difference. 

It doesn’t matter if home values are decreasing, school districts always get an increase year over year – although small at times. Property tax revenue never goes down and it represents 80 percent of Community Consolidated School District 15’s funding.

Then why did the district deficit spend $4 million dollars this year? Why is it forecasting increasingly larger deficits over the next five years?

It’s those controllable yet uncontrollable expenses. 

“As we look at our budget going forward, we project that expenditures will continue to be more than our revenues. Which means the fund balance will continue to go down, down, down - and we know that is something we can’t continue to do,” said District 15 Assistant Superintendent for Business Michael Adamczyk at last week’s Navigate15 community engagement session

School districts are a people-centered business. Eighty percent of District 15’s expenditures are for salaries and benefits. Benefits alone were $22 million this year – and insurance costs keep rising. 

Did you know the district pays an amount equivalent to the premium cost for single coverage for every full-time employee – for its medical, dental and vision plans?  Employees who elect to take family coverage pay 50 percent of the dependent premium. Life and long term disability insurance also is provided at no cost to the employee.

And the total cost for family coverage as well as the employee portion of pension contributions are included in some administrators’ compensation package.

Salaries are another controllable expense. 

The vast majority of district employees belong to a union – teachers, program assistants, secretaries, custodians and as of last year – so do the bus drivers. 

Salary increases have been negotiated and approved by previous Boards of Education. Although only two board members remain of those who approved the last few union contracts – all seven must work together to change the district’s financial future.

The one and only critical question discussed among the 50 plus attendees at the Navigate15 session was what "surprised" or "concerned" you most about the distirct's current financial position? And they had a long list of questions for the panel of experts that evening.  

(Note: The entire list of questions and audio from the panel discussion will be posted on the district's Navigate15 webpage.)

What is the district doing to control costs?
Answer: They are in the planning stages. A five-year forecast is a starting point.  Plans and adjustments will have to be made with the Board of Education. 

But is the forecast realistic? It calls for revenue increases of 2.5 percent yet the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is increasing by only 1.5 percent for fiscal year 2012. It also assumes no increase in base salaries for teachers once their contract expires next July. 

And it still projects a $5 million deficit for the upcoming school year

What would a bare bones budget look like to put District 15 in line with revenues?  Answer: Prioritize. First cut everything out that is not mandated by the federal or state government – or negotiated contracts. Then start adding programs back until expenditures equal projected revenues.  

Optional district programs include library resources, curriculum and technology updates, class size and fine arts. 

“Obviously when you have to cut significant dollars and eighty percent of your budget comes from salary and benefits . . . it comes two ways either through negotiations . . or from reducing staff,” said school financial consultant Robert Grossi.

How much of an impact would a one year freeze on salaries – no base, no step and no lane increases – have on the forecast? 

Answer: About $4 million dollars – not enough to close the budget gap.  

But it must be closed and the sooner the better for all involved.

So what will it be - negotiations or cuts in District 15?

Next week - What's on the legislative horizon for school finances?

About this column: Jennifer Mondy has lived in the Palatine area for more than 27 years. She writes a regular column about education issues in Palatine. Mondy has written for Spotlight on the Board since 2006, a web site dedicated to coverage of Community Consolidated School District 15. Mondy also is newsletter chairperson for the Northwest Suburban Council PTA and an independent consultant for The Big Deal Books, publications that contain resources for various audiences in the education market. Mondy has been active in education issues and was among those who circulated petitions regarding District 15's bond issue. Related Topics: Budget Deficit, District 15, Michael Adamczyk, and jennifer mondy

Louise

10:21 am on Friday, June 10, 2011

So what will it be - negotiations or cuts in District 15?

Sadly I think we have the answer. The recent attempt at modifications to the current teacher union contract proved futile. You can hardy blame the teachers union. No one likes it when they endure layoffs, salary cuts and freezes, loss of benefits, reduced vacation time, or skyrocketing insurance costs.

It will be the students who suffer.

Reply

edmund

12:08 pm on Friday, June 10, 2011

Many of the "common knowledge" assumptions made in this article are highly incorrect. A bank does not pay full property taxes when a home is in foreclosure. All they need to do is argue that the property is impaired. Landlords use this strategy when rentals are vacant.

When a owner appeals their property taxes others owners are not forced to make up the difference. All owners in Palatine should appeal because it appears that we are all overtaxed. We are dramatically overtaxed. The assessor says that my home is worth nearly 450K. The final tax amount is set on that valuation. But in this market I would be lucky to get 75% of that. Therefore, I am overtaxed 25%. Are the schools entitled to that extra money? No Way!

Another major assumption is that D15 is run efficiently. Must the taxpayer foot 1/2 the bill for family insurance? No. Must a school have assistant principals? No. Can busing be subbed out? Yes. Can base, rate, and step be cut? Yep. Can instrumental music be eliminated? Yep. Can class sizes be increased? Of course. Can roofing be patched? Yes. We in Palatine have learned that almost anything can be Patched. Janitorial services can be subbed out. Maintenance should be subbed out. Program assistant should be cut.

It is time for a return to basics: Spoiled parents and brats can move if they don't like it. An austerity budget would be 60% of today's budget.

So many parents are out of work that a strike will not be inconvenient.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Brian Slupski

4:52 pm on Friday, June 10, 2011

Hi Edmund,
Re: Property values and taxes.
If everyone's property value in Palatine was reduced including yours...your taxes would not go down. The tax cap would simply adjust tax rates upward to compensate for the loss in property value. The tax cap more or less guarantees a revenue increase for taxing bodies at the rate of inflation. There are properties that are "outliers"...homes that are taxed at a much higher value than similar homes in the same area. Those could get a real reduction.

Leave a comment