Written by Jeff Rumage
Mitt Romney announced Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Janesville) as his vice presidential running mate Saturday morning.
Ryan, 42, has served in the House of Representatives for 14 years, currently chairing the House Budget Committee and serving on the House Ways and Means Committee. In January 2010, Ryan gained attention nationwide after unveiling his "Roadmap for America’s Future."
Romney formally made his VP announcement on a tour of the U.S.S. Wisconsin in Norfolk, VA. In the announcement, Romney said Ryan is an "intellectual leader of the Republican Party."
Romney also said Paul understands that people can have honest disagreements without making personal attacks.
"There are a lot of people in the other party who might disagree with Paul Ryan, but I don’t know of anyone who doesn’t respect his character and judgment," Romney said.
- BREAKING: Paul Ryan is Mitt Romney's VP Pick: This is Patch's main story on the announcement, breaking just after Romney announced his choice via a smartphone app. It was updated to include excerpts from Ryan's acceptance speech in Norfolk, Va.
- Paul Ryan: "Thrilled to be a Part of America's Comeback Team": Here's the text of Ryan's speech as prepared before the official announcement with Romney in Norfolk, Va. In it, Ryan says Romney has the "courage to tell you the truth."
- Paul Ryan's Rapid Ascension from Janesville Craig Grad to Romney's Running Mate: Who is Paul Ryan? Here's a report on his political history, characterized by a quick rise onto the national political scene.
- Photos: Mitt Romney's Running Mate, Paul Ryan, Works His Way Through Wisconsin: Here's a gallery we pulled together with photos of Ryan working in Wisconsin over the past year.
kelly brand
11:16 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
He screwed up again. Our gain!
Abigail
11:32 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
The screw ups are on your side, Kelly.
Nancy Murphy
1:43 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
I ran into a man at the EV/Skokie Dog park who quite succinctly said "I'd vote for a can of dog food if it was on the ballot opposite Obama.
My sentiments precisely.
Rick
11:25 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Paul Ryan is well regarded in his district and in the Congress as a detail man, a sharp intellectual and someone who cares for the people in his community. He has been elected 7 times in the overwhelmingly Democratic area because he serves the district well. In Washington, he is known as one of a handful of politicians who understands the details of Washington finances.
Abigail
11:31 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
He is a far better candidate than Joe Biden. I think this election will be a cakewalk for the Republicans. Besides the Democrats are whistling past the graveyard now as it is because they don't have a decent record to stand on, so they just make false accusations and lie about Romney.
I think this spells the end for the Dems--about damn time too.
Red Sam Rackham
3:57 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
In 1980 I voted for mediocre incumbent Jimmy Carter b'cuz I didn't think much of Reagan. However the Gipper turned out to be a surprisingly great president and I did vote for him in 1984 and have never regretted it. Who knows what'll hapen this election year. Again we have a mediocre incumbent DEM vs an allegedly out of touch Republican, the kind of choice that inspires voter apathy. I'm even considering writing in Daniel Lawrence Whitney (aka Larry The Cable Guy) for prez ... GIT R DONE!!!☺
Lutie
7:14 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
I agree Abigail!
Doesnt matter
12:05 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Too bad Obama is planned to win...? I'm not really sure how this can be a cakewalk.
A. M. Kelly
2:26 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Not so much, Abigail, what the right wing hate to admit is that President Obama found and killed America's NUMBER ONE Enemy AND saved the Auto Industry whereas Romney's response to bin Laden was it "wasn't worth" paying a lot of money to "find one man", even though "that one man" was the cause of TWO wars and THOUSANDS of Americans murdered on 9/11,,,He wanted our Auto industry to go BANKRUPT, too....But why should we expect anything different from Republicans?...Your party's Dumbya, not only let 9/11 happen on his watch (after being warned about an air strike for SIX MONTHS) he called a phoney war on Iraq to answer it, paid it on a credit card running UP the defict PLUS borrowing MORE money from China to give tax breaks to the Uber Rich, and that was after INHERITING a surplus from Bill Clinton!...Wow!...What "winners" these guys are!...No wonder they hide Dubya as far away as they can, and have been reduced to attempting Democratic Voter Suppression..Their "constituency" is mainly old white men -- the super rich ones and the super dumb ones..No one else wants them, and their worthless party should be gone after their defeat in November.
Richard Schulte
11:36 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
An inspiring choice for a vice-presidential candidate made by Mitt Romney. Congressman Ryan is the most knowledgeable person in America on the US budget. Paul Ryan is the right man at the right time. Mitt Romney's choice for vice-president shows that the Romney Administration will be serious about addressing the deficit and the debt. President Romney will put America back on the right track.
Quite frankly though, any stray cat in America would have done a better job than Obama these last 3-1/2 years. Obama-Worst.President.Ever. The recession in America ends the evening of election day.
Red Sam Rackham
3:58 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
... or after the January inauguration?
Doesnt matter
12:06 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Saying Obama is/was the worst president ever makes you blind to political news. Bush was worse, and Nixon was even worse, and I can't say either was the worst president.
Marco
11:31 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
Richard Schulte... I agree Obama is far worse then Jame Buchanan!
Plus he's not even American and he's going to steal our guns.
We need Romney - the rich need more tax breaks! I was at my friends house this weekend and he was telling me that his wife was so upset that she could not get a new Bentley! And this guy is CEO of a major company which he says if they cannot drop the corporate tax rate that they will have no choice but to raise costs on Americans for their product.
That's an entirely different story in itself! Can you imagine how hard these corporations have it now. I meant one oil refinery goes down in northern CA and they have to take the time to tell all the gas stations to change the signs outside to a higher rate. That's a lot of people to higher to make those phone calls.
We need to have more guns and give corporations a break. The rich need more money as well.
If I stop eating for a week I was told a rich person would create a job for someone else.
It's time the middle class gives back!!!
Tim Lally
12:55 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Obama came in to the worst economy in American history and had to fix it with a bunch of idiots in Congress. As a veteran who dearly loves this country but hates the morons that have been elected to Congress, I see no other choice but to let Obama have another 4 years. Hell it took GW 8 years to put us in this situation, we should give the Dems 8 years to fix it.
Conceal Carry
11:41 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Can't wait for the debates. ..
Sully
11:49 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
So Abigail, Romney did not accuse Obama of restricting voting for military personnel in Ohio, and he didn't say that Obama is going to take the work requirement out of welfare, and Romney didn't take Obama speeches, cut out sections, and then splice the words to make it seem Obama said something that he really didn't? No, Romney's been completely honest in this campaign, right?
Rick
12:08 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Sort of like Obama not backtracking from his campaign ad that Romney caused the death of a woman who caught cancer 5 years after she left Bain? Yea sure.
Red Sam Rackham
3:59 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Now now ... Honest Politician is an oxymoron.☺
Lutie
7:15 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Oh please. Obama and his DirtOcrats are a disgrace.
A. M. Kelly
2:31 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Romney's a liar as Republican Newt Gingrich was the first to say...He's now proven it with his One Hundred Percent False campaign ads.
Sully
12:15 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
So it's okay for Romney to make blatantly false comments? No presidential election is terribly clean, but some of Romney's claims are pure fiction not based on any reality.
Rick
1:58 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Read comment immediately above for outrageous lying by this president's campaigns.
Nightcrawler
4:10 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
You mean like Obama PROMISING to cut the national debt in half by the end of his first term in office in Feb. '09? Go look it up on youtube, it's there, word-for-word, not out of context or anything.
McCloud
12:19 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Great choice, now we can talk about the real issues like a bad economy from bad policy, instead of side show contrived Democrat playbook ones.
Sully
12:28 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
I guess this is Obama's fault-
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/aug/10/illinois-workers-bain-outsourcing?newsfeed=true
RB
12:36 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Romney clearly pandered to the right wing social conservative base. Picked Ryan despite his (Ryan's) desire to end Medicare as we know it and cut entitlement programs when they are most needed. Planned Parenthood gives Ryan a big fat Zero rating and The Human Rights Organization gives him a big fat Zero. The NRA gives him a......100. Right down the right hand alley Mittons.
Richard Schulte
2:13 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
You are absolutely correct RB. Thumbs up Paul Ryan.
David
12:39 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
First Mitt Romney, and now Paul Ryan? Are the Republicans trying to lose the election in November on purpose??
Obama / Biden 2012. "Continuing to clean up the mess of the Republican Great Recession."
Larry Svendsen
1:51 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Poppycock.
Rick
1:59 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
We need some adults to take us out of the Obama Great Depression.
Red Sam Rackham
4:01 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
B-b-b-but Romney/Ryan may be a better choice than McCoot/Palin, doncha think? Yeah! That's the ticket!☺
Nick
1:45 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Obama/Biden 2012!
If you believe a voucher system is going to solve everything then vote for Romney!
If you don't believe medicare, social security, or even our post office system. Then vote for Romney. If you believe privatizing and deregulating is a solution, then vote for Romney.
If you believe the rich need bigger breaks than vote for Romney.
If you believe food stamps are bad, then vote for Romney
If your okay with outsourcing jobs, then vote for Romney.
If you believe using loopholes to avoid paying taxes, then vote for Romney.
If you think avoiding taxes, by hiding money offshore is great, then vote for Romney.
Rick
2:01 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Yet you voted for Obama, got 6 out of 7 of the above and think giving him a do over will erase the failures of the first 4 years?
Richard Schulte
2:23 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Vote for Obama and get another 4 years of this miserable economy.
I lost my house. I'm not mad at the bank about it because the bank didn't cause the miserable economy-Obama did.
"It's the economy stupid."
Nick
2:57 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Sorry for your loss Rich, but the downward spiral started during Bush. You cannot expect anyone to cure the economy overnight, when the damaged done was beyond belief. Romney's solution are not the answer to this mess, but were the reason these things happened. Obama isn't perfect, but Romney would be a lot worse!
Nightcrawler
4:11 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
@Nick: At what point does everything stop being Bush's fault?
Is that what real leaders do, make excuses?
RB
8:08 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
People that think Obama caused this economy are Out of touch with what has been going on for 30 years, particularly the part where we did not pay for two costly wars and a drug program. Oh well, to each his own.
maria
11:18 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
The 2% rich are already paying 94% of our tax revenues and the middle40 % are paying minimal or nothing= zero.
Romney did not outsource. Obama gave tax payer monies billions to his chronies and special interests and invested to foreign companies.
Sully
2:33 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
You may want to look up the Libor scandal, Rich.
Richard Schulte
2:43 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Sully, you may want to look at the Stimulus, Obamacare, the GM bailout, "Cash for Cluckers" and the Keystone XL pipeline among many other policies of the Obama Administration which keep us mired in this recession. The recession should have ended 2-1/2 years ago and I'd still have my home.
Nick
2:51 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
The economy has gotten better imo. The economy would have been even better if the republicans goals weren't to make him one term president!
Rick
8:00 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Lucky you. Unfortunately that is not the case for many who have declined as Obama's failures have grown.
A. M. Kelly
2:41 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Of course, the economy has gotten better..The Auto Industry is at it's PEAK, but Mr. aph Romney wanted it to "go bankrupt"...Riiiight, Willard. This country was hemorraging 800 THOUSAND jobs a MONTH in the last month's of the BUSH PRESIDENCY...Even Republicans know Bush was a bad joke who ran UP the Deficit, while giving HANDOUTS to the wealthiest Americans and that's WHY Willard did NOT seek his endorsement, and will NOT be at their convention, and they are all but running and HIDING from him, though Romney/Ryan want to DUPLICATE his Nation-wrecking poliicies!
Sully
2:57 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
You see, Rich, that's why you're a fraud. What Libor did absolutely hurt the economy to no end, yet you are so narrow-minded and fixated on blaming democrats for everything wrong in the world, you can't even consider the evidence. And whether you choose to believe the stimulus, the GM bailout, and healthcare is the reason for today's economy, you are simply misinformed. Some how I have to believe there are other reasons for you losing your home. Where's that personal responsibility?
Richard Schulte
3:11 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Sully: "You see, Rich, that's why you're a fraud. What Libor did absolutely hurt the economy to no end. . . ."
"The problem with liberals is not that they no so much, but that they no so much that isn't true." Ronald Reagan
Sully, you look for any excuse to protect Obama and his merry band of Democrats (marxists). To use a phrase coined by Senator Reid, Obama and the Democrats are a "miserable failure".
My mistake with the house was that I actually believed Biden when he lied about "the summer of recovery" two years ago. I take responsibility for being gullible in believing a Democrat, just as I take responsibility for voting for Jimmy Carter in 1976. Haven't voted for a Democrat since 1976 and I won't ever believe a word that a Democrat says again.
Nightcrawler
4:14 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Just yesterday, Sully tried to tell everyone he doesn't hurl insults directly at people.
I guess telling someone who lost their home because of a bad economy that they've "a fraud," like you did above doesn't count as an insult. What an idiot. Personal responsibility? How about your president promising that the national debt would be cut in half by now? What about the unemployment rate being almost DOUBLE what it was at ANY time during Bush's terms?
Don't lecture us about personal responsibility when your lying president has shown NONE himself. All the liberals do is blame everything on Bush.
Sully
4:48 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Hey Joe, I didn't call Richard a fraud because he lst his home.i called him a fraud because he continues to ignore facts that don't mesh with what Rush tells him and he refuses to answer direct questions. I also don't recall ever using the colorful language that you prefer to use- "liberal fart smell"? Good one. I hate to tell you this, but Obama is your president as well, unless you're not an American citizen. I never said Bush was not my president. I never said democrats are completely blameless. I even disagree with Obama on several issues (such as having Emanuel and Geitner as advisers and his cozy relationship with wallstreet). If some of you cared to look with a nonpartisan eye, you'd see Obama has done several things that would please you if he were republican. But since you can't get past your blind devotion to the right wing, you only see what they want you to see and do t question anything they may say.
kelly brand
3:24 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
A favorite of the Koch brothers, Ryan has accused scientists of engaging in conspiracy to “intentionally mislead the public on the issue of climate change.” He has implied that snow invalidates global warming.
Ryan has voted to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from limiting greenhouse pollution, to eliminate White House climate advisers, to block the U.S. Department of Agriculture from preparing for climate disasters like the drought devastating his home state, and to eliminate the Department of Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA-E):
Richard Schulte
3:30 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
kelly brand: ". . . Ryan has accused scientists of engaging in conspiracy to “intentionally mislead the public on the issue of climate change."
Global warming is a hoax. Everybody knows that.
Nightcrawler
4:15 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
@Kelly: More lies and half truths from the Democrats. Chances are you didn't even know who Ryan was before today.
Rick
8:04 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Steven Koch is a top Obama bundler in Chicago.
kelly brand
3:32 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Ryan’s budget, which means austerity for most Americans, turns out to mean prosperity for Ryan and his family.
That budget, which the GOP-led House adopted as its blueprint, slashes funding for everyone from seniors to the disabled to students while preserving $45 billion in tax breaks and subsidies for Big Oil over the next 10 years, as has been widely reported.
But what we have only just learned from Ryan’s financial disclosure forms for Congress (here) that were made public this week is “he and his wife, Janna, own stakes in four family companies that lease land in Texas and Oklahoma to the very energy companies that benefit from the tax subsidies in Ryan’s budget plan,” as The Daily Beast reported today.
Ryan’s father-in-law, Daniel Little, who runs the companies, told Newsweek and The Daily Beast that the family companies are currently leasing the land for mining and drilling to energy giants such as Chesapeake Energy, Devon, and XTO Energy, a recently acquired subsidiary of ExxonMobil.
These energy giants stand to profit directly from the $45 billion in subsidies and tax breaks. How cozy!
Ryan’s office says the congressman wasn’t thinking about himself or the oil companies that lease his land when he drafted the budget blueprint that extended the energy tax breaks. “ Now Ryan’s office says he has no control over his ethics where family is concerned. Apparently nobody ever explained to him what conflict of interest means.
“
Nightcrawler
4:16 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Because heaven forbid we should ever try to bring more natural resources to the US to reduce our dependence on foreign sources of energy.
Rick
8:07 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Obama never considered ethics or that it was corrupt to buy his house at a discount from Tony Rezko, a known Chicago fixer.
Gramps Pupany
2:28 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Thank you darling wonder Mitt! Thanks for blessing us with inspiration of inherited wealth. Thank you for teaching us nobody should pay more tax just because they hide money, tax-free, in the Caymans & Bermuda & Switzerland & Andorra. Thanks for having fools pay their taxes, while you live in luxury. Thanks for building an elevator for your cars & limos in one of your 7 palaces, which also gives us inspiration to be like you: accomplished & not being afraid to demonstrate loyalty to yr fellow accomplished friends with the promise to further lower their taxes. And also thank the Ryan budget author for promising to reduce yr tax rate to 1%. After all 13% tax rate sure beats the 37% rate those on salaries must pay. It'ss inspiring for all of us not yet rich as you; not rich like yr daddy, not rich as yr wife or boys. Thank you for choosing a running mate who is also a millionaire from the inheritance from his great-grandfather, the road builder, whose company was passed down to his son & then his son, Paul's Daddy afforded Mr. Ryan a life in Wash.DC & inspiration to lower taxes on his multimillionaire mom & dad & all those whom God has blessed. You go Mitt! Why should Americans wait for the government to give a measly retirement to those who paid for it, when you show how to take care of yourself? Why give people Obamacare just because people without $ get sick? If God wants them sick, why go against God's will? O Mitt, how inspiring you are! Pay no attention to envy!
kelly brand
3:46 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Richard-you are kidding about global warming being a hoax.-right?
Red Sam Rackham
4:05 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
I won't say that global warming is a hoax but I don't believe it's caused by my use of aerosol cans or driving a car.
Sully
4:53 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
No zkelly, he's not. To him "everybody" is the one or two discredited oil industry scientists and the ones who profit from denial. You can tell him 98 percent of the world's scientists believe in and have proof of global warming, but Richie focuses on the two percent who don't. Of course, it's just a liberal hoax, right? Next he'll be talking about a anime Magazine article from the mid-70's to prove global warming isn't real.
Sully
4:55 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Should say 'Time Magazine' and sorry about the z in front of your name, Kelly.
Rick
8:09 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
98% of scientists? Really? Wouldn't the thousands that have challenged the mainstream status quo be surprised.
SportzFan
5:47 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Richard has lost all credibility with his comment "everybody knows global warming is a hoax" .....people thought the World was flat at one time too.
Richard Schulte
4:02 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
kelly brand: "Richard-you are kidding about global warming being a hoax.-right?"
"The problem with liberals is not that they know so much, but that they know so much that isn't true" Ronald Reagan
You have to be really gullible to believe in man-made global warming. If global warming is occurring, the Sun (or perhaps the Earth's wobble) is the cause. Not much we can do about the Sun.
Drill, drill, drill. . . . .
A. M. Kelly
2:48 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Richard...You said "Everyone knows global warming is a hoax"...I guess you meant "everyone" but about NINETY EIGHT PERCENT of the World's scientists, duhhh!
Nick
4:09 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Sorry if you believe the keystone pipeline, is going to fix your problems. How about blaming yourself? Lack of insight can be a killer. By the way, what's more valuable to life, oil or water? Personally I would never want to drink any amount of oil! What about the crop fields that need the water? What about the fish, cattle, and any other life in these area? Your points are just based on greed for yourself! Your logic is more than sad, its actually pathetic!
Nightcrawler
4:18 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Yet I bet that doesn't stop you from going to the Starbucks or the McDonalds or any other huge corporate chain that was built on once what used to be farmland.
If you've ever shopped at any of those places or say, in Round Lake Beach along Rollins Road, you are a complete hypocrite.
Rick
8:11 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
So the other pipelines in that area are clean but this one pipeline will be dirty?
Nick
4:48 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Nice try! I'm all for business, but I also support responsibility. You support business, but you also support a free for all for the corporations! No responsibility should be your motto, since you believe businesses will never do any wrong..
Richard Schulte
5:12 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Nick: "No responsibility should be your motto, since you believe businesses will never do any wrong."
Yes, the Government always knows best. Why do we even have a private sector? Why not let Obama tell us what and how to do things? He's a Harvard man-he knows everthing and he's got plenty of time to play golf too.
I thought monopolies were bad. That's what we're told, isn't it? Isn't the Government a monopoly? So if monopolies are bad, let's get rid of the Government monopoly.
Richard Schulte
4:50 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Joe Richardson: "Just yesterday, Sully tried to tell everyone he doesn't hurl insults directly at people."
Just for the record, here are all of Sully's comments on Patch. He's quite a delightful human being. His dogs growl at him whenever he comes near. So does his wife.
http://evanston.patch.com/users/sully-6/comments?page=3
Sully, 11:07 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012
"How very adult of you to criticize someone for not knowing the exact laws for gun ownership. I don't own a gun, so I don't really need to know everything. Rick, since your mental age seems to be about 11, I'll do you the favor of ignoring the rest of your comments. You're welcome."
Sully reminds me of Mr. Potter in "It's a Wonderful Life".
Sully
5:00 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Same ole stuff, Richie. How about answering a question once in awhile rather than changing the subject?
Sully
4:57 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Joe, your comment to Nick is totally irrelevant. Just like Richard, you ignore what others say by responding with what? Nothing.
Richard Schulte
5:03 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Nick: "Sorry if you believe the keystone pipeline, is going to fix your problems. How about blaming yourself? Lack of insight can be a killer. By the way, what's more valuable to life, oil or water? Personally I would never want to drink any amount of oil! What about the crop fields that need the water? What about the fish, cattle, and any other life in these area? Your points are just based on greed for yourself! Your logic is more than sad, its actually pathetic!"
Nick, before you write, you might want to have some idea of what you're writing about. There are already oil and gas pipelines all across the US, including Nebraska. The Keystone XL pipeline will just be one more. If you want to see where all those pipelines are, try Google.
Will oil and gas production solve our unemployment problems? Look at the unemployment rate in North Dakota and Texas. There is a boom in eastern Ohio and West Virginia too. Canada left the world-wide recession behind 2 years ago with developing its energy resources. If we don't want Canada's oil, the Chinese will take it and use it.
If you want to know what oil and gas does for an economy, take a look at the opulent societies of the UAE.
Pipelines are the safest means of transporting oil and gas. Not building the Keystone XL means that oil and gas will be transported by (Warren Buffet's) railroad. If you're concerned about the environment, then the KXL pipeline is the environmentally sound way to go.
Sully
5:11 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Just stay away from the water and be careful of those earthquakes in Ohio due to fracking! Otherwise, no problem!
Sully
5:26 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Hey Rich, in case you don't know the difference, my question is legitimate. Yours is juvenile hogwash. Just the same old tired responses, Rich. All you've got is what Rush tell you. Hey here's a question maybe you can answer - David Barton: genius historian or history revisionist? Your move, buddy! Then maybe we can move on to some of the facts about Romney's and Ryan's quest to leave no millionaire behind. Wonder how much money the Kochs are going to be pouring in now. With all that money, and voter disinfranchisement, Romney may have a chance. By the way, did you see Fox's latest poll (before Ryan, anyway) Obama up by nine. Rasmussen is about the only poll not in Obama's favor. But polls don't really mean much this time of year, so who's counting?
Nightcrawler
5:50 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Ewww, there's Sully all over that toilet paper!
Richard Schulte
7:08 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Excuse me Sully, do you have Prince Albert in a can?
Nightcrawler
5:52 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Funny how Sully was touting "personal responsibility," in a post above, yet it's mostly his Democratic pals who are colleting welfare and popping out 4 or 5 kids on your tax dime and voting for Obama, in many cases, for that reason alone.
Yep, that's personally responsible.
A. M. Kelly
10:40 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
Steve Morgenson:
"yet it's mostly his Democratic pals who are colleting (sic) welfare and 'popping out 4 or 5 kids on your tax dime and voting for Obama, in many cases, for that reason alone".
Whew..I feel like I need a bath after reading that, not to mention a Time Machine as Mr. Morgenson trots out the old "welfare queen" race-baiting schtick. Mr. M -- my spouse and I are college educated, lifelong democrats who've never seen a welfare check in our lives. We make well into into six figures and though we don't begrudge people that need them, however many kids they're "popping out", as you so crudely put it. Interesting that you would mention that, though, since its Republicans who favor restricting women's reproductive choices.
Even though Democratic President Bill Clinton changed "Welfare as we know it" forever with a WORK Requirement that President Obama is continuing. people like Mr. M. never left their old 1950's racist stereotypes, however long they've been discredited...He'd probably like to to bring back Minstrel Shows and public acceptance of the "N word" too.
Studies show that Republicans, in 2012 are most likely older white men with, at best, only a high school education...Sorry, there, old Mr. underacheiver.
Sully
5:54 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Another mature comment by Joe. Very impressive. I wonder how old you are.
Nightcrawler
5:58 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
If I didn't make valid points you wouldn't keep excessively responding to what I type. I could be 20, I could be 60. Who cares? I'm old enough to spot your ignorance and half-truths. Just giving a dose of your own medicene.
Nick
5:55 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Exactly stay from the water! Till then I don't trust these corporations. How did the fracking go for those people, which own homes with natural gas coming thru the faucet? How much do these folks have to pay. for clean drinking water now? What about their home values? What about all the contaminants that effect the environment now? Not only people!
Richard Schulte
7:24 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Nick: "How did the fracking go for those people, which own homes with natural gas coming thru the faucet? How much do these folks have to pay. for clean drinking water now? What about their home values?"
Natural gas coming out of the faucet? Not due to fracking. That's a story made up by environmentalists. A hoax just like global warming. Environmentalists just make up all sorts of b.s. and gullible people like Nick believe it.
Clean drinking water? Not a problem-another hoax perpetrated by environmentalists.
Homes values? Through the roof.
Terri
11:06 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Holy hell, this Richard Schulte is one of the scariest paranoids I've encountered on these threads. I don't comment often, but this is outrageous. Facts mean absolutely nothing to you, Richard. The devastating effect of fracking is NOT a hoax. Does nothing get through your greedy, selfish right-wing bubble?! Have you ever seen Gasland or done any research for yourself. Why do you choose to remain ignorant and not consider FACTS on these issues. Listening to right-wing propaganda entertainers as your sole source of information does not make you informed. It makes you foolish.
Nightcrawler
5:55 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Funny how in almost every post Sully makes I can point out specifically where he's being hypocritical.
So predicatable.
Now he will deny being hypocritical, ask for a specific instance where he was being hypocritical, even though I just gave an example.
If that doesn't work, he'll whine that it was all Bush's fault, or insult someone personally on here, then get mad when someone does it to him.
If that doesn't work, he will change the subject.
If that fails, he'll find a link to something that bolsters his point, but ignores key facts or fails to tell the whole story.
Maybe he's really Obama posting under the name Sully. he sure misleads people and lies enough to be.
Sully
6:02 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Un huh. I'm always blaming Bush. If that's true, it shouldn't be hard to point out an occasion in which I've done that. You have no clue Joe. None at all.
Nightcrawler
6:09 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Your words Sully, on this very site, October, 2011: "As for the so-called "job creators", if that's the case, why has unemployment been the issue it's been for years (including the Bush years)?"
You asked for it, there it is. A specific instance when you did. Perhaps I should paste the link too to refresh your memory.
Quick, change the subject because someone called you out and proved you were lying....again.
Funny, the unemployment rate under Obama has been almost double what it was at ANY point under Bush, for the past three years.
Richard Schulte
7:04 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
It took Joe Richardson 7 minutes to find a Sully quote that shows that Sully is full of b.s. Joe must have been doing that with half his brain tied behind his back.
Sully
8:29 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
So asking a question about unemployment and job creators, and adding "including the Bush years" means I'm blaming Bush? Really? Nice interpretation guys. Try again.
McCloud
6:25 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
It is time to talk about the two years where Obama had complete reign over our country, passed everything and anything he wished, and what do we have? Record debt, downgraded credit, record unemployment, record foreclosures. Lets see when Reagan was elected we were somewhere near 9% GDP. Any questions?
Richard Schulte
7:00 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Well, there you go again McCloud-using facts, that's not fair.
Doug Purington
6:40 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Ugh! Now the Republican ticket is twice as bad and Obama's bid twice as easy!
Richard Schulte
6:59 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Doug Purington: "Now the Republican ticket is twice as bad and Obama's bid twice as easy!"
Yes, sorta like 2010. Wait a minute. . . .2010 was a Republican landslide.
kelly brand
7:13 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Hey Joe R. Enjoy these facts.
Who gets welfare? This is where the race issue enters. Contrary to popular perception, the recipients of TANF are about equally divided between whites, blacks and Hispanics. According to the Department of Health and Human Services, in 2009 the TANF rolls were 31.2 percent white, 33.3 percent black, and 28.8 percent Hispanic. Yet the primary image of a "welfare recipient" in most people's mind is a black woman. This has been demonstrated in study after study by political scientists, psychologists, and communication scholars. Most Americans not only drastically overestimate the proportion of welfare recipients who are black, they also tend to believe that welfare makes up a huge proportion of the federal budget, when in fact it accounts for less than 1 percent of federal spending. As Donald Kinder and Cindy Ham wrote in Us Against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion, "means-tested programs like AFDC and food stamps are understood by whites to largely benefit shiftless black people." The racialization in perceptions of welfare is reinforced by the news media, which usually use images of black people to illustrate stories about welfare and poverty (Martin Gillens' Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy is the most complete examination of this topic).
Richard Schulte
7:27 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
kelly brand: "According to the Department of Health and Human Services, in 2009 the TANF rolls were 31.2 percent white, 33.3 percent black, and 28.8 percent Hispanic."
What is the percentage of blacks and Hispanics in the population of the US? As Fred Sanford used to say to Lamont: "Hey Dummy.".
Richard Schulte
7:14 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
I'm not much into videos, but this one is excellent: A Cancer Within the Presidency
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kSYT53NMug
RB
8:40 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Romney picking Ryan is a indication that the Republicans are throwing in the towel on the presidential election, hoping to hold the house and positioning Ryan for 2016. They've essentially conceded 2012.
Sully
9:15 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
I disagree, RB. I think they did that when McCain chose Palin. The republicans are not going to give the presidency away two elections in a row. With so much riding on policies for the wealthy, the Kochs, et al. will put as much money into this election as they possibly can. If the voter ID laws are not struck down in those swing states with republican governors, it could be a very difficult election for Obama.
Gregg Baker
8:48 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
The state of politics in America reflects the quality of our government. Both are a disgrace and an embarrassment to the American people. Fortunately we do not get all the government we are paying for otherwise we would be even more embarrassed and ashamed.
The quality of 80%-85% of this discussion sounds just like politics. Unsupported accusations, statement and assertions without fact. Less than substantive claims. Etc.
No one listens to the other person or what they are really saying. Again, much like our government.
No one seems to want to understand the other side before commenting back with some small particle of an argument expecting that to suffice.
The name calling sounds much like both politics and the 5th grade playground.
How can we expect the politicians to raise the bar and be both factual and honest in their representations if the quality of the dialogue across the country is well represented in this series of comments?
I think most people realize that America is in serious trouble. The blame resides on both sides of the aisle. The blame resides with both political parties. The blame resides with multiple presidents, going back to the Johnson administration. The blame belongs to the American people for not demanding more.
America needs a leader. Someone who can inspire, direct, and pull us out of the problem we face. Who is that person?
The quality of 80% of the discussion
Richard Schulte
7:06 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Greg Baker: "The quality of 80%-85% of this discussion sounds just like politics. Unsupported accusations, statement and assertions without fact. Less than substantive claims. Etc. No one listens to the other person or what they are really saying. Again, much like our government."
Hmmmm. . .why listen to the other side when you already know what the other side is going to say? This debate has been going on since the 1960's-same debate. This debate is nothing new-what's new is different participants-older folks die off and are replaced with younger folks. The younger folks haven't heard the last 30 years of the debate because they weren't born yet.
Take the issue of man-made global warming-either you believe in it or you think it's nonsense (a hoax). The two sides are mutually exclusive.
Tax increases/spending: Does the gov't spend too much or is it that taxes are too low? Should we cut spending or raise taxes, or both? The answer is obvious to both sides of this debate.
At least this part of Mr. Baker's post is nonsensical, however the second half of Mr. Baker's post makes an important point.
"I think most people realize that America is in serious trouble." Hmmm. . . I have to disagree. I'd say a majority of people in America do not think that there are serious problems. If a majority thought we have serious problems, we being doing something about the problems.
Alan Nudelman
9:16 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Sorry to come late into this discussion.
Dear Mr. Baker,
I agree with most of your post, but take issue with a statement you make. "The blame resides on both sides of the aisle." Around 2010 (not sure of the exact date) Republican leaders stated explicitely their main goal was to ensure President Obama would not be reelected. Not jobs, not the economy, not security, not health care - no, to do what it took to prevent the President from being elected. Even before then and since then, the Republican party has monolithically been dedicated to this task.
What has the Democratic party been doing since then? Trying to make America better. Trying to get people back to work. Trying to get the economy rolling. Trying to get everyone access to affordable, quality health care. Unlike the Republican party, the Democrats don't force everyone to lock-step in line. They disagree with each other, and discuss and compromise to resolve disagreements.
President Obama tried to work with Republicans in the House and Senate on budget, health care, and so on. The Republicans would not compromise. So he did what could, despite not having a supermajority in the Senate. After the 2010 elections, with a Republican house, that got even more difficult. But he's still trying.
Democrats have a history of cooperation. Republicans have a history of "My way or the highway."
I respectfully disagree with your statement that the blame lies with both parties.
kelly brand
10:27 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Paul Ryan’s extreme budget would end Medicare as we know it, turning it into a voucher program which would increase seniors’ health costs by $6,350 a year. Ryan has also proposed a plan that would have privatized Social Security, subjecting seniors’ retirement security to the whims of the stock market.
Richard Schulte
11:07 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
kelly brand: "Ryan has also proposed a plan that would have privatized Social Security, subjecting seniors’ retirement security to the whims of the stock market."
An excellent idea. Not privatizing the "social security" system subjects seniors to the whims of Government. If the US Government goes bankrupt, then social security goes bankrupt. And the US Government is bankrupt already. Not privatizing "social security" is the risky option.
It looks like kelly brand is reading from the Democrat cue cards that he/she have been given.
Richard Schulte
11:14 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Paul Ryan:
"We won’t duck the tough issues . . . we will lead!
We won’t blame others…we will take responsibility!
We won’t replace our founding principles . . . we will reapply them!"
Thumbs up. That's what we want to hear.
Nick
12:35 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Paul Ryan:
"We won’t duck the tough issues . . . we will lead!
We won’t blame others…we will take responsibility!
We won’t replace our founding principles . . . we will reapply them!"
Thumbs up. That's what we want to hear.
LOL, "We won’t duck the tough issues . . . we will lead"
Still crying after the last presidential race!
LMAO "We won’t blame others…we will take responsibility!"
Sure, republicans couldn't even take responsibility for the initial screw up of the economy under Bush. Always blaming the Democrats for their destruction of the economy during the Bush year. Constantly blaming Hollywood or is it the liberal media.
"We won’t replace our founding principles . . . we will reapply them!"
Destroy the economy and you want people believe the republicans on how the economy should be fixed! Romney just wants to continue the nonsense that got us into this mess. So destroy the economy and get kicked out of the office! Then tomorrow come by dressed like a repairmen and expect the people to fall for this?
Thumbs up. That's what we want to hear. Easy to please, when someone preaches every you hear on Rush. Rush's radio is the gospel according to republicons!
SportzFan
6:02 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
..........and if we question paul ryan..........he will have us arrested.
Nightcrawler
2:14 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
@Nick: 95 percent of Republicans don't listen to a thing Rush has to say. Nice try.
Here's an idea: Try learning how to construct a proper sentence before being critical of others.
Another clown bringing up Bush. Excuses, excuses.
Richard Schulte
6:16 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Nick: "Easy to please, when someone preaches every you hear on Rush. Rush's radio is the gospel according to republicons!"
Rush Limbaugh is not a Republican. Rush is a small government conservative. (I'm not a Republican either.)
Democrats are clueless as to what Rush is about. Democrats are also clueless as to what the TEA party is about. That's fine with me-not surprised that Democrats don't understand what's going on.
Richard Schulte
6:26 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
A little analysis by John Fund:
"First, if Ryan is an extremist and his proposals are so unpopular, how has he won election seven times in a Democratic district? His lowest share of the vote was 57 percent — in his first race. He routinely wins over two-thirds of the vote. When Obama swept the nation in 2008, he carried Ryan’s district by four points. But at the same time, Ryan won reelection with 65 percent of the vote, meaning that a fifth of Obama voters also voted for him."
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/313732/smart-democrats-should-be-worried-john-fund
Richard Schulte
6:33 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Paul Ryan:
"...And we've been talking about how much we agree on different issues, but there really is a difference between us. And it's basically this. We don't think the government should be in control of all of this. We want people to be in control. And that, at the end of the day, is the big difference..."
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/paul_ryan_and_the_triumph_of_math.html#ixzz23KYy5fnF
Richard Schulte
6:35 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Another Paul Ryan quote:
"...America is not just a nationality it's not just a mass of land from Hawaii to Maine, from Wisconsin to Florida. America is an idea. It's the most pro-human idea ever designed by mankind. Our founders got it right, when they wrote in the Declaration of Independence that our rights come from nature and nature's God - - not from government. Should we now subscribe to an ideology where government creates rights, is solely responsible for delivering these artificial rights, and then systematically rations these rights?"[/quote]
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/paul_ryan_and_the_triumph_of_math.html#ixzz23KZRkRB9
Richard Schulte
6:49 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
A little more analysis from American Thinker:
"A staggering 51 percent of those who graduated from college since 2006 don't have a full-time job, according to a recent study. Ironically, these are the same voters who mobbed the polls for Obama in 2008, giving him a significant part of his winning margin."
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/ryan_pick_targets_key_demographic.html#ixzz23Kd4unvf
Richard Schulte
7:38 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
"This is very important: Ryan gets under Obama's skin. He is smarter and better informed than the President. Already, the GOP is beginning to go after Obama's likability as a result of the outrageous cancer ad they won't condemn, lied about, and of course teed up. Romney talked of the nasty campaign today. They will try to set up a comparative message of a vision for growth versus the gutter, which is pretty accurate at this point. Already some evidence of backlash against cancer ad in tracking polls this week. I think Ryan will sell better than negative Bain ads at this point."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/08/the_ryan_rollout.html#ixzz23KoFvqCr
So it's a campaign with a vision vs. a smear campaign. Even if President Obama were to be re-elected, he wouldn't be able to govern after running a smear campaign. It would be 4 more years of hell.
With the Republicans holding the House and taking the Senate (that's a foregone conclusion), the Obama Administration would be a 4 year lame-duck administrations.
Face it Democrats, the 2012 election is already over. The Democrats lost the 2012 election on election day in 2008.
Me
7:46 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Another venue for the extremists from the right and left to argue. Patch is a site for local news and not national politics. How about some editorial control! Below is a description of Patch from their website.
"What is Patch?
Simply put, Patch is an innovative way to find out about, and participate in, what's going on near you.
We're a community-specific news, information and engagement platform driven by passionate and experienced new media professionals. Patch is revolutionizing the way neighbors connect with each other, their communities, and the national conversation.
We want to be the most trusted, comprehensive, and relevant news and information resource in your community. What can you do on Patch?
Keep up with news and events
Check out photos and videos from around town
Learn more about local businesses and the people behind them
Participate in discussions
Share your perspectives via our Local Voices blogging platform
Submit your own announcements, photos, and reviews"
Richard Schulte
8:05 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Not surprising, but Me is trying to shut down the conversation. What could be of more importance to the local community than the 2012 election.
President Obama is from Chicago. VP candidate is from Janesville, Wisconsin. Sounds like a presidential election with two local politicians involved.
The purpose of Me's comment is to try to stop political discussions which with he disagrees with. Another attempt at censorship by Democrats. Me, like most Democrats, oppose free political speech. Very chilling-actually marxist.
Just Sayin
7:52 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
R&R are dead in the water. Barack will win again. This discussion is a waste of time and total folly. Find something better to do with your short lives.
Richard Schulte
8:09 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
"This discussion is a waste of time and total folly. Find something better to do with your short lives."
That's what members of Parliament said in 1776. Patrick Henry's response was "Give me liberty or give death." Patrick Henry's words still ring true today.
Richard Schulte
7:53 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Paul Ryan "slices and dices" Obamacare to Obama's face in this C-Span video:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/08/ryan_and_obama_have_mixed_it_up_before.html
Very politely, Ryan calls Obama a liar to his face. Who was right about Obamacare, Obama or Ryan? Don't need to watch the video to know the answer to that question. It's sad to say this, but President Obama has been lying to the American people for 3-1/2 years.
JKlein
8:39 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
JK
I've read all this commentary and to be honest it makes me sick! All I'm interested in is who's going to clean up our mess. I'll be listening and watching and I guess praying we come up with a good answer.
Richard Schulte
10:47 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
JKlein: "I've read all this commentary and to be honest it makes me sick!"
Not sure I understand why it makes you sick. The choice between Obama and Romney is very clear.
If you want more of the same as we've had for the last 3-1/2 years, then Obama is the man. If you want something different, then Romney is the guy.
Obama picked Biden for his VP. Romney picked Ryan. That in itself says enough about the two candidates for president for anyone to make a choice.
If you think Biden is qualified to be the president in the event something should happen to Obama, vote for Obama. If, on the other hand, you think that Paul Ryan is more qualified than Biden to be the president in the event something should happen to Romney, then vote for Romney.
It's my opinion that Biden and Sully are equally qualified to be the president in the event something should happen to Obama.
Rob
9:17 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
I hear ya JK
Take 10 minutes and watch this...even if it's 10% true...it should scare the he'll out of all of us.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-HqHSkYG-Y&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Richard Schulte
11:03 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Sully: "If the voter ID laws are not struck down in those swing states with republican governors, it could be a very difficult election for Obama."
In other words, if the Democrats are not permitted to cheat, Obama could be in trouble.
Should dead people be allowed to vote? Should felons in prison be permitted to vote? Should dogs and cats be permitted to vote? Should illegal aliens be permitted to vote? Should nursing home residents with dementia be allowed to vote? The Democrats think so. The Democrats also think that they should be permitted to vote as many times as they want.
If you want to know how Democrats play the game, read about the 1948 Democrat primary campaign for senate in the State of Texas between Lyndon Johnson and Coke Stevenson. Lyndon Johnson became the Democrat Senate candidate in 1948 by buying votes in counties along the Rio Grande. When Johnson got caught stealing votes, he lawyered up and denied that any votes were purchased.
Here's the story from The New York Times. If it's the NYT, it must be true, right Sully.
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/11/us/how-johnson-won-election-he-d-lost.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
Sully
12:30 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
And now back to the 21st century and reality-
http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/1268
http://www.truthaboutfraud.org/
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20120812_Analysis__In-person_vote_fraud_near_zero.html
"A new nationwide analysis of more than 2,000 cases of alleged election fraud over the last dozen years shows that in-person voter impersonation on Election Day was virtually nonexistent.
The analysis of 2,068 reported fraud cases by News21, a Carnegie-Knight investigative-reporting project, found 10 cases of alleged in-person voter impersonation since 2000.
With 146 million registered voters in the United States, those represent about one for every 15 million prospective voters."
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/07/23/pennsylvania-gopers-concede-that-voter-fraud-claims-are-a-myth/
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/07/pennsylvania_voter_id_no_in_person_voter_fraud.php
Richard Schulte
11:25 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Terri Chaseley: "Holy hell, this Richard Schulte is one of the scariest paranoids I've encountered on these threads. I don't comment often, but this is outrageous. Facts mean absolutely nothing to you, Richard. The devastating effect of fracking is NOT a hoax."
"The crux of the matter is there is no concrete evidence supporting the claim. Dozens of federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration, have not been able to produce justifiable evidence that links fracking to serious environmental consequences. The U.S. Bureau of Land Management has also failed to solidify any scientific data that would lead to harsher regulations."
Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/brighammccown/2012/08/10/fracking-regulations-stalled-despite-lack-of-evidence/
How many times do the environmentalists have to "cry wolf" before we stop believing anything that they say. Man-made global warming is a hoax. All this nonsense about fracking is nonsense too.
Rember the Gulf oil spill 2 years ago. Where did all of that the oil go? Hmmmm, there are bacteria in the ocean that eats oil. Oil leaks from the bottom of the ocean occur everday and nature takes care of it. Ain't no big deal. Nature took care of it.
BTW, I started using BP gasoline because of the oil spill. If BP had been left to fix the leak, the leak would have been shut down quickly. The Coast Guard screwed it up-SNAFU.
Richard Schulte
11:39 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
More on fracking:
"The Environmental Protection Agency has dropped its claim that an energy company contaminated drinking water in Texas, the third time in recent months that the agency has backtracked on high-profile local allegations linking natural-gas drilling and water pollution."
"In addition to dropping the case in Texas, the EPA has agreed to substantial retesting of water in Wyoming after its methods were questioned. And in Pennsylvania, it has angered state officials by conducting its own analysis of well water—only to confirm the state's finding that water once tainted by gas was safe. "
April 1, 2012 WSJ
Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303404704577313741463447670.html
30 years ago, I used to be a member of the Sierra Club-no more. I'm beginning to believe you environmentalists are simply kooks. No, wait, that's not true. I started thinking that about 10 years ago.
I don't believe a word that environmentalists say anymore. Aesop's Fable about "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" applies. Environmentalists have "cried wolf" so many times, I stopped listening a long time ago.
Richard Schulte
11:46 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Gas and Oil pipeline maps for North America. Hmmm, there are already pipelines all over the place. The horse is out of the barn already. The Keystone XL pipeline would just be another pipeline-no big deal.
http://www.google.com/search?q=oil+pipeline+map+north+america&hl=en&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=_9wnUJHPKITiqgG_24DYCQ&ved=0CGEQsAQ&biw=943&bih=465
Terri
11:48 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Deny, deny, deny. Facts don't matter. How intelligent do you need to be to know that 2 million gallons of chemical dispertant and 4.1 million gallons of oil are going to have a permanent effect on our ecosystems? My 5-yr-old could figure that out. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2012/04/pictures/120420-gulf-oil-spill-impact-studies/ http://www.sacbee.com/2012/08/10/4713658/bp-sponsored-gulf-of-mexico-research.html http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/07/30/30greenwire-oil-spill-dispersants-shifting-ecosystem-impac-95608.html
Richard Schulte
12:09 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Terri Chasely: "Facts don't matter. How intelligent do you need to be to know that 2 million gallons of chemical dispertant and 4.1 million gallons of oil are going to have a permanent effect on our ecosystems? My 5-yr-old could figure that out."
I wonder if your 5 yr-old has an engineering degree. I do, along with 35 years of experience. Do you have any idea how large the Gulf of Mexico actually is? Concentration of chemicals matter.
Many foods and water contain arsenic. Of course, arsenic is a toxic chemical. The reason that you don't die when you drink water or eat foods which contain asenic is that the concentration of arsenic is so tiny that it has no impact on the body. In fact, I recall reading that the human body actually needs an extremely tiny amount of arsenic to survive.
As previously noted, oil leaks from the ocean floor continuously. Oil is part of the ocean eco-system. A little oil in the ocean ain't no big deal. Think of all the ships and airplanes that are in the oceans from the WW I and WW II-these ships and airplanes contain oil and oil products and there are still fish in the ocean.
Of course, being an environmental kook, you wouldn't know that. And, if you're really concerned about the environment, you'd be screaming about the CFL bulbs that contain mercury and be trying to get them banned-but, facts don't matter to idiots.
Terri
12:22 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Naturally, didn't take the time to read the articles posted to read evidence that the oil spill has had an impact on our oceans. They would not mesh with your delusional ideology. Oil seeping from the ocean floor is not the same as 4.1 million gallons pouring out. I didn't realize you had a science degree, which would of course be revoked since science is based on facts and evidence. And, the FACTS show that fracking is killing people/animals. You have no idea what environmental issues I "scream" about. Global warming isn't man-made just like smoking doesn't cause lung cancer. Let me guess, that's a hoax too.
Terri
12:25 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
To quote Jeremy Grantham, manager of the $100B GMO fund:
Conspiracy theorists claim to believe that global warming is a carefully constructed hoax driven by scientists desperate for ... what? Being needled by nonscientific newspaper reports, by blogs, and by right-wing politicians and think tanks?... Being a climate scientist spokesman has already become a hindrance to an academic career, including tenure. I have a much simpler but plausible “conspiracy theory”: that fossil energy companies, driven by the need to protect hundreds of billions of dollars of profits, encourage obfuscation of the inconvenient scientific results.
Richard Schulte
12:40 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Terri Chasely: " Conspiracy theorists claim to believe that global warming is a carefully constructed hoax driven by scientists desperate for ... what?"
Marxism. When the Soviet Union disintegrated, the Communists didn't just all die at once. Perhaps you've heard the term "watermelon"-green on the outside, red inside. Global warming is about imposing socialism.
Perhaps, you heard of the NOAA. The scientists at the NOAA predicted global cooling in the mid-1970's and we believed the NOAA. Now the same gov't agency tells us it is global warming. Hmmmm. . . ."fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me."
If the Earth is warming (or cooling), the likely cause is the Sun and we know very little about the Sun.
Google "global cooling and Time" or "global cooling and Newsweek" and read about the global cooling predictions from the 35 years ago. Then Google "New York Times and global cooling" and read about the alternate predictions of global warming and global cooling since the1850's. This has been going on for the last 160 years-alternative predictions of cooling and warming every 30 years or so.
Only a fool would look at the historical record and not figure out that the scientists don't know what's going on. We don't know what we don't know.
Terri
12:26 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Challenging vested interests as powerful as the oil and coal lobbies was never going to be easy. Scientists are not naturally aggressive defenders of arguments. In short, they are conservatives by training: never, ever risk overstating your ideas. The skeptics are far, far more determined and expert propagandists to boot. They are also well funded. That smoking caused cancer was obfuscated deliberately and effectively for 20 years at a cost of hundreds of thousands of extra deaths… The profits of the oil and coal industry make tobacco’s resources look like a rounding error. In some notable cases, the obfuscators of global warming actually use the same “experts” as the tobacco industry did! The obfuscators’ simple and direct motivation – making money in the near term, which anyone can relate to – combined with their resources and, as it turns out, propaganda talents, have meant that we are arguing the science long after it has been nailed down. I, for one, admire them for their P.R. skills, while wondering, as always: “Have they no grandchildren?”"
Richard Schulte
12:48 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
I'm not funded by the oil companies. I've looked at the evidence and haven't been convinced that the climate scientists have any clue about what they are talking about. In fact, all the evidence points to man-made global warming being a hoax.
Sorry, but I've been on Planet Earth for almost 60 years and have seen a lot of environmental predictions that are b.s.-over-population of the Earth, followed by starvation; no fish in the oceans; no polar bears; frequent massive hurricanes caused by global warming; Manhattan under water. How many times do you have to have your leg pulled before you understand what's going on?
The environmental "snake oil salesmen" are after your money. Donate so that the President of the Sierra Club can buy a new SUV to drive around in.
Richard Schulte
12:59 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Terri Chaseley: "I, for one, admire them for their P.R. skills, while wondering, as always: “Have they no grandchildren?”"
Ahhh, a combination of the the emotional argument with the "settled science" argument. Who says it's settled science? The researchers who are getting grants say it's settled science-nobody else does. So, if climate change is indeed b.s, there go the research grants. So, of course, the climate scientists have got to keep the "gravy train" running. You're correct-it's all about money. The climate scientists would be out of a job if global warming is found to be a hoax.
Sully
12:39 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Rich, your engineering degree does not mean you are an expert on every single aspect of engineering. Seems to me your specialty is maybe wiring buildings and making sure fire risks do not occur. I'm sure you'll correct me however.
Richard Schulte
1:20 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Well Sully, you make a valid point, however, engineers 35 years ago were required to take a core cirriculum of mathematics, chemistry, physics, mechanics, thermo-dynamics, fluid dynamics and probability/statistics. These courses were common to all engineering disciplines. In addition, my engineering speciality was required to take organic chemistry. The purpose of taking all of these courses was not that they would necessarily be used after graduation, but to train engineers to be able to think and think logically.
When I started in engineering school, it was 1 year before the advent of the electronic calculator. During my freshman year, we learned how to use a slide rule. That's how most engineering was done back then. "Slide-rule engineers" have an advantage over today's engineers because you sort of have to know the answer to a problem in order to use a slide rule. Today's engineers use computers to pop out answers, but they have no idea whether or not their answers are reasonable and make sense.
And since you inquired, my work deals with how buildings respond in a fire and how to protect the occupants of buildings in a fire. I deal with sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems, structrural fire resistance and building egress systems.
I have been using computer modeling since the early 1980s. My experience with computer modeling of building fires tells me that climate modeling is absolutely b.s.-no question about it.
Sully
1:34 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Amd I'm sure you keep up to date by going to seminars, taking a few classes, reading up on the newest technology. That's not likely though since you take arguments from the 40's and 70's and think they're still valid today. Another question- how exactly are building fires the same as climate change?
Richard Schulte
2:07 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Sully: "Another question- how exactly are building fires the same as climate change?"
"The problem with liberals is not that they know so much, but that they know so much that isn't true." Ronald Reagan
Actually Sully, an expert in one's field studies the history of the field in order to figure out how we got from one point to another. Last fall, I spent 3 months in archives reading documents and speeches in my field from the late 1800's and the first two decades of the 1900's. The amount of information available that I have never seen or was even aware existed was phenomenol.
History is always relevant to everything that we do today. That's why we study history. The history of climate change "science" is also important. The history of climate change "science" is documented in The New York Times since the late 1850's.
Even though the study of climate change is more than 150 years old, it is still in its infancy. Humans do not understand the Earth's environment-while we may know more than we did 30 or 40 years, the amount of knowledge that we don't know about the Earth and our eco-system pails in comparison to our ignorance. That's just the way it is.
Now to answer your last question. Despite working on the problem for more then 30 years, we still can't predict accurately how a fire will burn in a building. If we can't do something so relatively simple, why would you think that we could model the Earth's climate? Climate modeling is b.s.
Sully
2:27 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Total bull, Rich.
Richard Schulte
4:41 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Sully: "Total bull, Rich."
Sully has no explanation why The New York Times was talking about climate change in the 1850's and has continued to publish articles on either global cooling or global warming for the last 160 years. Since he can't explain why alternating stories on global warming and cooling have appeared in The NYT, Sully simply dismisses it.
Sullly can't explain why gov't scientists at the NOAA were predicting global cooling in the mid-1970's, so he dismisses it and then blindly accepts that the NOAA is correct now that the NOAA is predicting global warming. Since he can't explain the global cooling prediction in the 1970's, Sully simply dismisses it.
You can tell by the fact that Sully like to dismiss fact sthat he's a learned man. Errrr, wait a minute, someone who dismisses facts can't be a learned man. I guess it means that Sully is really a learned ass.
The Q
4:08 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Hope and change .......is for the sheep. 5 trillion later, thats a 50% increase in debt in 3.5 years. America was not built on dependecy and handouts.
The chicago way, the illinois way, is total failure.
Richard Schulte
4:45 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
The Q: "The chicago way, the illinois way, is total failure."
Both the City of Chicago and the State of Illinois are bankrupt. Banruptcy of a municipality or a state can be considered to be total failure of the political system. So yes, the chicago way is a total failure-at least from the citizenry's point of view. I'm sure that Mayor Daley and his friends made out like bandits-that's all that really counts.
Sully
4:52 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Richard, we are not in the 1970s or the 1940s. This is 2012 and there have been quite a few discoveries, improvements, and technologies since those years. You continue to use a Time magazine article (?) to try to prove you're right, just as you quote Reagan over and over and over again. I don't know-maybe you never got a current calendar, but we are not in the 70s and Reagan is not the president.
I'm still waiting for a legitimate response to the many questions I have asked you. Possibly ignoring them? Naw, couldn't be that.
Richard Schulte
5:14 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Sully: "I'm still waiting for a legitimate response to the many questions I have asked you. Possibly ignoring them? Naw, couldn't be that."
It's taken Sully a few weeks, but, by Jove, I think he's figured it out.
Richard Schulte
5:24 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Sully: "Richard, we are not in the 1970s or the 1940s. This is 2012 and there have been quite a few discoveries, improvements, and technologies since those years. You continue to use a Time magazine article (?) to try to prove you're right, just as you quote Reagan over and over and over again."
How many times do climate "scientists" have to be wrong in their predictions before you stop believing them? The climate "scientists" have been wrong 5 or 6 times in their predictions in the last 160 years. A "snake oil" salesman could do better than that. With only two possible answers, just guessing at what's going to happen, cooling or warming, would be more accurate than the "science".
Perhaps a thousand years from now, scientists will be able to figure it out, but we're still pretty much ignorant of the Earth's eco-system. We don't even have a reliable cure for cancer right now and we've been working on finding a cure for a century or more.
Climate "scientists" today are like a flock of ducks-quacks.
Sully
5:25 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Ah, more obfuscation, more hiding behind the fact that you have no answers. Impressive, Rich. So, LIBOR, Reagan tax increases, global warming is a hoax and everyone knows it, um, what else? I'll slow down and let you work on these before giving you others. Thanks Rich. I look forward to your explanations regarding these issues.
The Q
4:54 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Just like Obama's buddies have made out like the bandits that they are.....4 more years and the USA will be barkrupt too.
It must end.
Marco
2:08 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
Posted by The Q
We have a new game in town which is the same as the old game and it involves the deregulated banking system and Wall Street. Sadly the very same people Obama brought on to manage this are the very same people Bush Jr had and Clinton used as well. And those are some of the very same people that worked to deregulate the entire industry.
That effort is really what caused the economic collapse of this nation - and the last 4 presidents can take responsibility for that.
I did not vote for Obama and I think he is full of crap because he wasted time at the start of his term when he had the Senate and House doing very little. He has not changed the very system that caused the recession - in fact he's nor even discussed it.
But honestly a Romney ticket would do far worse.
I have too say that these elections seem to be more about the less of two evils then a good solid candidate. Where the hell is Eisenhower???
I cannot fathom the people who's only goal is to vote Obama out because they want him out - because the buy into this big government ideology that is posted by the reps for the last 30 years. Most if not all of these people do not even realize what that means - they should ask themselves how well off is their state financially with "less government".
We're in big trouble and no politician has the balls big enough to do what is right IMO. They are equally in it all for the money and life long healthcare - single payer mind you.
Richard Schulte
4:59 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
A. M. K.: "Not so much, Abigail, what the right wing hate to admit is that President Obama found and killed America's NUMBER ONE Enemy AND saved the Auto Industry whereas Romney's response to bin Laden was it "wasn't worth" paying a lot of money to "find one man", even though "that one man" was the cause of TWO wars and THOUSANDS of Americans murdered on 9/11,,,He wanted our Auto industry to go BANKRUPT, too....But why should we expect anything different from Republicans?..."
Did I miss something? Obama killed Osama? Damn, I thought the Navy Seals did that and that Obama was on the golf course when it happened. Those rascally Republicans spreading false stories about the Navy Seals getting Osama. The gall of those Republicans. Oh wait, I just looked it up-the Navy Seals did get Osama, while Obama was playing golf or sitting on his ass in Washington.
And that saving the auto industry thing, I thought United Airlines declared bankruptcy a few years ago and is still in business. And didn't American Airlines just declare bankruptcy and is till flying. How did Obama save GM? If Obama had allowed GM to declare bankruptcy like United and American Airlines, they would still be in business today. Obama didn't save GM. Obama saved the UAW. And it was the UAW who bankrupted GM.
This person A. M. Kelly is really confused. Thanks to the US Navy for getting Osama.
The Q
5:22 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
You are spot on richard......give them hell, they just dont get it. You cant get something for nothing.
Sully
5:49 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
I guess the navy acted on its own then, huh? Obama didn't have anything to do with it. Then I guess Bush didn't have anything to do with the invasion of Iraq. After all, he wasn't there personally. Right Richard?
Richard Schulte
6:35 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Actually, I think that the credit for getting Osama should go to President Bush because Bush authorized the water-boarding of KMS. The water-boarding of KMS got the information which led to Osama.
Democrats say that Bush is still responsible for the economy even though Obama has been the president for 3-1/2 years. Based upon that logic, Bush should get the credit for getting Osama. The Democrats need to be consistent.
Sully
5:52 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Once a fraud, always a fraud. Answer just one question Rich. Just comment on one of the issues I brought up earlier. I should have included Dadid Barton too. You do know who he is, correct?
Richard Schulte
6:48 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Sully: "Once a fraud, always a fraud."
Every morning Sully gets up and looks in the mirror and says "Once a fraud, always a fraud."
Sully
7:49 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Wow, I'm shocked. Who gave you that? Rush or Coulter?
Marco
2:16 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
Richard Schulte
6:35 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
"Actually, I think that the credit for getting Osama should go to President Bush because Bush authorized the water-boarding of KMS. The water-boarding of KMS got the information which led to Osama.
Democrats say that Bush is still responsible for the economy even though Obama has been the president for 3-1/2 years. Based upon that logic, Bush should get the credit for getting Osama. The Democrats need to be consistent."
I agree - and would assume that probably most of the intel which helped to find Osama should be credited to Bush Jr. Again as far as the collapse of the economy - that gets pinned on Clinton and Bush Jr.
To blame Obama is just ridiculous.
Sully
7:53 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Yet once again, NO ANSWERS! These questions shouldn't even be that hard to answer. Unless of course, you can't think for yourself and Rush hasn't discussed the subject for you.
Sully
8:01 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Here ya go Rich, one more chance-
You don't blame the banks for losing your home, rather, you blame Obama and the democrats. So, in your own words, tell me how LIBOR and the banks were not at all responsible for today's economic troubles. Thank you in advance.
Richard Schulte
6:25 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
Another excellent article on global warming on the American Thinker website. The following is an excerpt:
"Surely the solution is to require any group of experts to be able to sufficiently explain their decision at several levels of complexity, right down to the very simple. If you cannot teach your idea simply, maybe you cannot really defend it. In particular, the experts must be able to explain fully without omissions, because omitting contradictory or anomalous evidence or ideas is the easiest way for an expert to convince a lay person, who is usually unaware that the confounding material exists.
Experience in financial and legal matters shows that we need some combination of auditing, checking, red teams, and professional defenders. Why should climate be any different?"
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/the_keys_to_the_climate_debate.html#ixzz23QM5cEQ8
The article is a simple and an easy read. The author asks: why have the predictions from the computer models been wrong for the last 20 years? If the models can't actually predict what actually happening, then the models are wrong. And since climate science relies on the models, if the models are wrong, then climate science is b.s. (i.e., hoax).
Of course, Terri won't read the article. Why? Her mind is made up and, if she's wrong about global warming, her whole world would be destroyed. It's better to be ignorant than to have your whole world dstroyed.
Richard Schulte
6:44 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
A little information on Medicare:
"First, there is Medicare. That program will go broke by 2017. So what did Nancy Pelosi want to do? Answer: expand it to include all Americans. Meanwhile, seniors cannot find a doctor who will accept them if they have Medicare coverage. Why? Because Medicare pays so little to providers that they lose money every time they take care of a Medicare patient. For icing on that cake, the ACA -- Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010 -- will cut Medicare reimbursements even further: an additional 21-27%. How does Congress think that doctors who cannot pay their staff will still be able to practice medicine?"
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/medicare_and_medicaid_rip.html#ixzz23QSGs9Wy
Sully
8:46 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
Okay Rich, I guess my last question was a little too difficult for you. I'll make it easier-
How many times did Ronald Reagan raise taxes when he was president?
Richard Schulte
7:07 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
The problem:
"There are 10 parking enforcement employees for the 1.3-square-mile beach city southwest of downtown Los Angeles, and they pull down some disproportionate compensation, considering their job functions. In fact, the two highest-earning employees for fiscal year 2011-12 are estimated to have made more than $92,000 and $93,000, respectively, according to city documents provided by Patrick “Kit” Bobko, one of five council members and who also serves as mayor pro tem. Those two have supervisory roles. The other eight parking-enforcement employees make from $67,367 to $84,267 in total compensation."
Source: http://briancalle.ocregister.com/2012/08/10/hermosa-beach-meter-maids-making-nearly-100k/
And now you know why cities in California are declaring bankruptcy. The solution to the problem seems actually pretty simple. It's time to start cutting the salaries and benefits of public employees at all levels of government.
Mikein algonquin
7:57 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
Sully, the report regarding voter fraud is totally inaccurate. It reports inpersonating, voters, but omits those that were not legally allowed to vote.
In Minnesota alone, 177 people have been concvicted, not just charged.
http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2012/08/07/2012-tuesday-voter-fraud-not-suppression-is-real/
Richard Schulte
10:29 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
Based upon the number of fraudelent votes in Minnesota, if my memory serve me, Norm Coleman actually won the Senate race between him and Al Franken. In other words, Al Franken stole the Minnesota Senate election from Norm Coleman.
Yup, Sully, there is no election fraud. To quote Sully, "Once a fraud, always a fraud." I'd say it's been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that Sully is a fraud. And according to Sully, Sully will always be a fraud.
Sully
8:34 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
Out of how many total voters? And there hasn't been just one investigation, there have been several that have confirmed voter fraud is not the widespread problem republicans want you to think it is. In the cases where fraud was found, a picture ID would not have changed the result. Do you not find it odd that all of the targeted individuals in each state with voter ID are mostly democrats and that the governors are republican? Do you not find it a bit suspicious when the state of Pennsylvania reports there is no evidence of fraud, however, a picture ID is still necessary? Add that the secretary of state (I think it was sec of state) said that requiring picture ID will assure a Romney victory (due to the number of minority and older voters who won't be allowed to vote). Also tell me why in Ohio, republican voting districts will have their polls open during extra hours, but democratic districts will not. Just some questions to ponder.
Richard Schulte
11:09 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
Sully: "Do you not find it odd that all of the targeted individuals in each state with voter ID are mostly democrats and that the governors are republican?"
Not at all. It is well-known that Democrats play the vote fraud game. Anybody who lives in or near Chicago knows that. And, of course, that's why Democrats are opposed to voter ID requirements. If they weren't cheating, why would anybody oppose voter ID requirement? You need a picture ID to buy liquor and cigarettes and get on an airplane. There is nothing more sacred to means of governance than the sanctity of the vote.
McCloud
9:01 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
The economy sucks, credit downgrades, record debt, record unemployment, record foreclosures, 1% GDP. Voter suppression not necessary, sideshow issues should be ignored. The President is a failure.
Sully
9:20 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
Credit downgrades due to the tea party's unwillingness to compromise on anything despite the harm it may do to the people. And I would say disenfranchising possibly millions of voters is a little more than a sideshow.
Nightcrawler
9:43 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
What in the world are you talking about? They are the only ones who want to do anything about cutting our ridiculous budget in Washington!
Tell me, was there a Tea Party member on the bipartisan "Supercommittee" the president ordered to come up with a budget, yet they STILL failed? No, it was all Democrats and Republicans.
Now, because of THEM, there will be AUTOMATIC budget cuts enacted after the first of next year, which will raise the taxes on the majority of the middle class by a whopping 13 percent, and no, that's not a mis-print, it's a fact.
Yet you keep blaming the boogie man Tea Party as if everything is their fault.
It'd be nice if the liberals on here could go even a few posts without lying or telling half-truths, it really would.
Richard Schulte
10:25 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
Sully: "How many times did Ronald Reagan raise taxes when he was president?"
Ahhh, Sully asks a trick question. The obvious answer is none. The President of the United States cannot raise or lower taxes. Only the Congress is given the power to raise or lower taxes and all revenue legislation must originate in the House of Representatives per the Constitution of the United States. Civics 101, Sully. Any idiot knows that.
Sully
1:52 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
Gosh Rich, you can't even answer that one? Okay Richie, I'll make it just a little bit easier -how many times did Reagan sign off on tax increases?
Let's work on your reading comprehension now-
http://www.nationofchange.org/election-fraud-not-common-recent-voter-id-laws-suggest-1344871025
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/319-67/12909-voter-impersonation-almost-non-existent
Marc Brown
11:26 am on Monday, August 13, 2012
Instead of picking someone that could help Romney appeal to moderates or to help with foreign relations, he picks someone with no international experience who will raise taxes for the middle-class and give our social security to Wall Street. We can't afford that.
Richard Schulte
2:00 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
Marc Brown: "Instead of picking someone that could help Romney appeal to moderates or to help with foreign relations, he picks someone with no international experience who will raise taxes for the middle-class and give our social security to Wall Street."
Pray tell, what foreign relations experience did the Obama/Biden have? Biden was the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee if I recall. Is that foreign relations experience? Sounds like a Washington job to me. Biden is a joke.
The Republicans have more than enough foreign relations experience on the bench, from George Bush, Dick Cheney, Condi Rice and Don Rumsfeld. But the issue of the day is not foreign relations, but the American economy. Both Romney and Ryan have the experience where is counts.
For 3-1/2 years, the Obama Administration has been clueless on the economy. The two things that need to be done to get the economy going again-get rid of Obama and repeal Obamacare. If Obama is re-elected, we'll get 4 more years of this miserable economy.
Obama is a "miserable failure" (and Biden is a joke).
Marc Brown
2:28 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
If we want to win this election we have to win the swing states. People are just going to see who's on the ballot. Ryan's views on Medicare could cost us Florida!
McCloud
12:43 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
You have it backwards again, and it was only a few months ago. The Tea Party wanted cuts for debt ceiling raise, as they think our mushrooming debt is a problem. The Democrats threatened by claiming without a debt ceiling increase surely our credit would be downgraded. The Republicans caved in to Reid and the Democrats, raised the debt ceiling, and our credit was downgraded shortly after anyway. When truth gets flushed out, you guys like to twist and smear to avoid truth.
McCloud
2:13 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
Bottom line - The economy sucks, credit downgrades, record debt, record unemployment, record foreclosures, 1% GDP. Everything else is a contrived side show.
Richard Schulte
2:45 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
Marc Brown: "Ryan's views on Medicare could cost us Florida!"
Couldn't disagree more. Ryan's plan for Medicare will have no effect on anyone who is 55 years or older. In other words, there will be no change for those presently on Medicare or those who will be eligible for Medicare within the next 10 years.
Ryan's plan saves Medicare from complete collapse. Why would older folks in Florida be opposed to a plan to save Medicare from collapse?
Don't believe what you hear on ABS, CBS or NBS-it's all b.s. on those three networks. CNN (the Clinton News Network) is b.s. too.
Sully
7:27 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
How about major newspapers all over the state of Florida? They're all lying as well?
RB
5:33 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
As Romney assembles his Oligarchy, Florida is the least of his problems. The people will see right through the Republican attempt to wipe out every thing good for society we've fought so hard to implement over the past 75 years. Women, the elderly, the disabled and minorities should be particularly outraged at Ryan/Romney economics.
McCloud
5:55 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
You are probably refering to the wipe out of record unemployment our credit rating downgraded, record foreclosures, record deficit spending under Obama, failed stimulus, regulations, uncertainty of taxes, failed policies from the 1930s. Poor minorities are certainly the hardest hit.
Richard Schulte
6:13 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
46 million American using food stamps; U6 unemployment at around 15 percent; record foreclosures; America Airlines-bankrupt; GM headed toward bankruptcy a second time; Medicare headed for bankruptcy; California bankrupt; Illinois bankrupt; Chicago bankrupt.
Yep, no doubt about it, President Obama and his merry band of Democrats are doing a fine job if the purpose of all of this is to destroy the American economy. Now, let's play another round of golf. 104 rounds of golf for the President so far since January 20, 2009. How about if Obama actually did a little bit of work just for a change of pace-oh yeah, I forgot he went over to Pakistan and got Obama all by himself. He's still patting himself on the back about that one.
And I didn't even say a word about Michell Antoinette and her lavish vacations during a deep recession on the public's dime. "Let them eat cake." Barack and Michelle make King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette look like homeless royalty.
Richard Schulte
5:57 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
RB: "The people will see right through the Republican attempt to wipe out every thing good for society we've fought so hard to implement over the past 75 years. Women, the elderly, the disabled and minorities should be particularly outraged at Ryan/Romney economics."
That's right RB-you tell 'em. Hey, wait a minute-under Obama the poverty rate is the same as it was in the 1960's. Obamanomics has destroyed small businesses all over the nation. The economy is so bad under Obama that even American Airlines had to declare bankruptcy. And, if Obama gets another term, the economy will get even worse. (You ain't seen nothing yet when it comes to Obama-think Cuba.)
The Democrats talk about the Ryan plan for Medicare, but the Dems misrepresent the Ryan plan. (See above for how the Ryan plan will affect those 55 and over-no change whatsoever.)
The Obama/Democrat plan for Medicare is to let Medicare go bankrupt so that nobody will get anything. Who's plan is the extreme plan-the Obama plan of letting Medicare go bankrupt or the Ryan plan to save Medicare.
RB is quite simply a liar. Yes, that's right, I called the code pink guy a liar. How do you look at yourself in the mirror RB?
RB's plan is to let the United States Government go bankrupt and destroy this country. Excellent plan, marxist.
RB
6:07 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
As your leader Ronnie Iran Contra Reagan would say "Rich, there you go again", forgetting history, and making up 'facts'. Anything new out of you? I guess you're hoping the Ryan/Romney trickle down finds its way down to the bayou. Whatever.
Richard Schulte
6:03 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
Sully: "Gosh Rich, you can't even answer that one?"
Sully, I answered your question as you asked it and answered it correctly. I'm sorry that you don't know anything about the Constitution, but that's not my problem. Simply because you're dumb doesn't mean that you get a "do-over". In the private sector, you get one chance-blow that chance and you're out on your ass. You had your chance and now you're out on your ass.
Sully is just like Obama-he wants a "do-over" after he screws everything up.
Sully
7:29 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Stop playing games of semantics. It doesn't work. Answer the question, otherwise we can all pretty much see that you really know very little of anything.
Richard Schulte
6:19 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
RB: "I guess you're hoping the Ryan/Romney trickle down finds its way down to the bayou."
Florida will be just fine once the moving van pulls up to the White House to take Barack and Michelle stuff back to Chicago.
Things were just fine until election day in 2008 and then the phone stopped ringing. The phone will start ringing again the day after election day 2012. The last 4 years were a complete waste.
RB
6:24 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
Rich, it might also start ringing if you spent time looking for business instead of being a right wing amplifier. Just sayin.
Richard Schulte
6:52 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
RB: "Rich, it might also start ringing if you spent time looking for business instead of being a right wing amplifier."
Typical dumb ass liberal-gives advice about something he knows nothing about. I work in the building construction industry. I work on buildings like the Sears Tower. Look around Dummy-see any buildings like the Sears Tower going up in Chicago or anywhere else in Crook County or anywhere else in the US, except Washington DC, for that matter?
One of my colleagues went to Singapore to work. Others have gone to the Middle East to work. Some have gone to Afghanistan to work for the US Military. Many more have just gone out of business. There is no work in the US, except for Washington DC and Texas.
The CEO of the company I work for has determined that the best use of my time is to make Obama a one term president. (I'm the CEO.) When Obama is gone, things will improve rapidly and will be just fine.
If Obama is re-elected, I plan on closing down my company the next day-there won't be any work in the building construction industry if Obama is re-elected. I have no idea what I'll do if I close down my company-I guess go on welfare and come over to watch you work to pay my bills. I'll probably steal stuff from your business too. You didn't build that business of yours RB-I helped too, so part of your business is mine.
You better be working your ass off RB, so I can sit around and do nothing. Only a loser would work if Obama is re-elected.
Richard Schulte
7:08 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
RB, as you may have gathered, we're mad as hell and we aren't going to take it anymore. This miserable economy is all due to Obama and his merry band of Democrats (and idiots like you).
There is no excuse for what's going on with this economy-Canada is doing just fine with a conservative government. The TEA party folks are going to roll right over the Democrats in 84 days, just like in 2010. We want our country back.
Sully
7:42 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
CEO Rich? Really?
I don't recall any buildings like the Sears Tower going up during either Bush or Clinton or Reagan either. You just keep that head of yours in the rightwing sandpit, okay. Just like Rush tells you to.
coachoutlet
7:30 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
http://www.louisvuittonhandbag-outlets.org/ Louis Vuitton Handbags Outlet
http://www.getcoachfactoryoutlets.org/ Coach Factory outlet
http://www.atcoachoutletsonline.org/ Coach Outlet
http://www.saleincoachoutlets.net/ Coach Outlet Online
http://www.pradabag-outlet.org/ prada outlet
http://www.louisvuittonhandbag-outlets.org/ Louis Vuitton Handbags
http://www.getcoachfactoryoutlets.org/ Coach Factory
http://www.atcoachoutletsonline.org/ Coach Outlet Online
http://www.pradabag-outlet.org/ prada bags
http://www.saleincoachoutlets.net/ Coach Outlet
McCloud
7:44 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
RB is obviously in on the new revisionists resulting from liberals scratching their head after the Reagan revolution. Some crack pot has put together a piece to attempt to discredit and revise history with smoke and mirrors. Bottom line, Reagan inherited a mess and conquered it with historical economic growth while at the same time shatered the iron curtain. Obama and the liberals are failures, so these kind of bloggers are out in force.
Sully
7:44 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
How many times were taxes raised while Reagan was in office?
Richard Schulte
6:21 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
The President of the United States:
"Do we go forward towards a new vision of an America in which prosperity is shared?" Obama asked. "Or do we go backward to the same policies that got us in the mess in the first place?"
"I believe we have to go forward," Obama said. "I believe we have to keep working to create an America where no matter who you are, no matter what you look like, no matter where you come from, no matter what your last name is, no matter who you love, you can make it here if you try. That's what's at stake in November. That's what is why I am running for a second term as president of the United States of America."
OK RB, if you agree with the President, give us your address so that those who are less prosperous can come on over and help themselves to your "prosperity".
Sully, you too, give us your address so that those who are less prosperous can sleep in your home. It's called sharing your "prosperity".
Obama is a marxist.
Richard Schulte
6:31 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/08/13/obama_a_new_vision_of_an_america_which_prosperity_is_shared.html
Sully
7:49 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Well Rich, if you want to pay higher taxes while people like me pay less, that's your problem. It's really a shame that people are so easily snookered. Americans need to sacrifice to save their country? Okay, how about if the 1 percent sacrifice as well, instead of hiding their money somewhere outside the country. Their livelihoods really don't depend on that money. Unless of course you want to add to your plethora of homes with elevators for cars.
Richard Schulte
6:29 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Paul Ryan:
"We look at one another's success with pride, not resentment, because we know that as more Americans work hard, take risks, succeed, more people will prosper, more communities will benefit. And individual lives will be improved," Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said today at the Romney campaign event announcing him as the VP."
"America, America is just more than a place, though. America is an idea. It's the only country founded on an idea. Our rights come from nature and God, not from government. That's right. That's who we are, that's how we built this country. That's who we are. That's what made us great. That's what made us great. We promise equal opportunity, not equal outcomes," Ryan said."
Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/08/11/ryan_our_rights_come_from_nature_and_god_not_from_government.html
Paul Ryan's vision of America versus President Obama's vision of America. The choice is yours America. Chose wisely.
Obama's vision is really no different from Fidel Castro's Cuba.
Richard Schulte
6:40 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
"Say it ain't so Joe." The TEA party is back with a vengeance.
"I just got this disturbing report: Yesterday's Romney-Ryan rally in North Carolina pulled in an overflow crowd of 15,000 people.
There's no spinning that number. It's a LOT of people, and the Republican base in energized.
And that's not all. Since the VP announcement, Romney's campaign has brought in over 70,000 donations from his Tea Party base."
Source: http://washingtonexaminer.com/new-obama-panic-romney-crowd-sizes/article/2504781
RB
6:53 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Rich, there you go again. Romney can't explain how his budget is different than the Ryan budget. Maybe it's not. Tax cuts for the wealthy and change Medicare. One day in, and Romney is already on the defensive. The comedians at the Condo's in Florida will have a lot of material come fall. Is Romney running for President? Adult conversation will cause problems for him. Paul Ryan's budget is the key focus of the Republican Party. It won't go away...
Democrats will have it easy telling this story....Ryan has voted big Government for Bush 43 many times. He's no real small Government conservative. Tax cuts for the wealthy. Repeat.....
Sully
7:54 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Good thing Ryan had those social security checks coming in when he was teen. Otherwise he wouldn't have been able to afford college. Where might he be today without help from the government?
HM
9:42 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Sully, as someone whose father died when I was a teen, let me tell you that the measley social security checks did not put me through college. In fact, It was my parent's committment to saving and budgeting and discipline that put me through college, along with my hard work and studying. The governemnt had nothing to do with it. The money goes away when the teenager turns 18, which is about the time to start college. It may help with some bills, but let's not overstate it's value.
McCloud
8:48 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Pretty obvious the smell of desperation in these hacks who make lame attacks on Ryan. When your guy has failed, the only thing you can do is smear. I particularly like the rewrite of the Reagan years in an effort to cover up the stark contrast of success anf failure.
Sully
9:00 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Mac, feel free to look this stuff up. Ryan DID receive social security after his father died and taxes WERE raised during the Reagan years. When it became apparent to him that cutting taxes was not the right solution at that time, taxes were raised. Of course maybe "fees" sounds better to you, so just call them that. Is that more palliative to you?
McCloud
9:29 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
No need, I see through your purpose. You attempt to avoid the truth from the 1981 law 25 percent across-the-board cut in personal marginal tax rates resulting in unprecedented growth is laughable and pathetic. Tax revenues grew, economic indicators broke records. Liberals had to scheme a rewrite or be exposed as failures, as the guy currently in the white house has clearly demonstrated.
Sully
10:33 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
You really are oblivious, aren't you?
http://www.forbes.com/2010/02/02/barack-obama-ronald-reagan-budget-taxes-opinions-contributors-rob-shapiro.html
http://www.thepragmaticpundit.com/2012/01/reagan-raised-taxes-debt-ceiling.html
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/01/20/408345/reagan-raised-capital-gains-taxes/?mobile=wp
RB
10:01 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
The LA Times has an article comparing the Ryan/Romney ticket to the days of Taft. Informative reading.....
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-days-of-taft-20120813,0,3544670.story
Richard Schulte
10:12 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Sully: "I don't recall any buildings like the Sears Tower going up during either Bush or Clinton or Reagan either."
That's because you're an idot Sully. Either that, are you're senile.
"The Chicago Spire (previously known as the Fordham Spire) which was under construction in Chicago, Illinois has been cancelled; it would have been the tallest building in the United States, rising 2,000 ft into the sky." Source: Wikipedia
The hole in the ground for the Chicago Spire is still there.
Trump Tower, Chicago (competed 2009)
Bank of America Tower, New York (completed 2009)
New York Times Bldg., New York (completed 2007)
Bank of America Plaza, Atlanta (completed 1992)
US Bank Tower, Los Angeles (completed 1989)
Franklin Center, Chicago (completed 1989)
Two Prudential Plaza, Chicago (completed 1990)
Comcast Center, Philadelphia (completed 2007)
Key Tower, Cleveland (completed 1991)
One Liberty Place (completed 1987)
Source: Wikipedia
There are more, but I'm bored.
"Once a fraud, always a fraud." Sully, you're a fraud and you ain't too bright either.
Sully
10:36 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Semantics buddy. Semantics. There have been no buildings built like the Sears Tower.
Now let's see- LIBOR, tax increases under Reagan, what else was there? So many it's hard to remember.
McCloud
10:43 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
I can play that game too...
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2003/08/the-historical-lessons-of-lower-tax-rates
In reality you try to deflect the failure you voted for by smearing one of the greatest Presidents who served 30 years ago, desperate much?
McCloud
11:17 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Hey, the union bailout results are in: Obama's only self discerned accomplishment is really a failure, thanks for playing.
The Treasury Department says in a new report the government expects to lose more than $25 billion on the $85 billion auto bailout. That's 15 percent higher than its previous forecast.
From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120813/AUTO01/208130392#ixzz23XPgrNck
Guido McGinty
2:23 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
"BILL TITLE: Auto Industry Financing and Restructuring Act"
Ryan (WI) Aye
This is apparently the best that the Republicans can do.
"Don't vote for the Team Blue socialists, vote for the Team Red socialists. Can't you see the difference?"
Richard Schulte
11:48 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
I am so proud of my 25-year old son. Last night he called me after having dinner with his mother (the ex-wife). (He's one of those college graduates who hasn't found work yet. Well, actually he's got 4 years of college under his belt, but he hasn't graduated yet.) The ex-wife suggested that he apply for Medicaid. (He's been seriously ill for the last 5 years.) He told her no and she exploded.
He voted for Obama in 2008, but I can see that he finally gets it. He doesn't want to be a leech on society, even though he doesn't have a job and he's ill.
It took a while, but eventually your children grow up and mature. And when they do, they begin to understand how they have screwed over by Obama and his merry band of Democrats. It looks like my boy will be voting for Romney/Ryan this time around. I've got a smile on my face this morning.
Sully
12:44 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
If it weren't detrimental to 99 percent of the American people, I'd like to see Romney win. Who will Richard blame for his troubles when a republican is in office? I'm guessing it'll still be Obama and any democrat in congress. It couldn't have anything to do with Rich himself.
Richard Schulte
1:09 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
CNN catches Debbie Wassermann-Schultz making false statements about Medicare:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/08/13/brutal_cnn_torches_dws_on_medicare_falsehoods
Caught you DWS. And just in case you don't know who DWS is, she is the chairwoman of the Democrat National Committee (DNC).
Richard Schulte
1:16 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
"The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters now have a favorable opinion of Ryan, while 32% view him unfavorably. This includes 29% with a Very Favorable view of Romney’s vice presidential pick and 13% with a Very Unfavorable one. Only 13% are now unfamiliar with Ryan, and five percent (5%) are not sure about him."
Source:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/08/14/paul_ryans_approval_skyrockets_as_voters_get_to_know_him
Thumbs up. Oooops, looks like Obama/Biden got a problem with Paul Ryan.
Richard Schulte
1:23 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
"The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows Mitt Romney attracting support from 47% of voters nationwide, while President Obama earns the vote from 44%. Four percent (4%) prefer some other candidate, and six percent (6%) are undecided."
Source: Rasmussen Reports, August 14th, 2012
Guido McGinty
2:19 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Thus confirming that 91-96% of American voters are sheep.
Sandy
1:35 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
The question comes down to....."Are you satisfied with what you have today or do you want something better?" If you are satisfied vote Obama. If you think there is something better and you want it vote Romney. Wanting something different but doing the same old thing doesn't make sense.
Guido McGinty
5:40 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
What about those who are unsatisfied with the state of liberty?
Richard Schulte
3:58 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Voter fraud in Minnesota;
"Franken and his Democratic allies dispatched an army of lawyers to challenge the results. After the first canvass, Coleman's lead was down to 206 votes. That was followed by months of wrangling and litigation. In the end, Franken was declared the winner by 312 votes. He was sworn into office in July 2009, eight months after the election.
During the controversy, a conservative group called Minnesota Majority began to look into claims of voter fraud. Comparing criminal records with voting rolls, the group identified 1,099 felons -- all ineligible to vote -- who had voted in the Franken-Coleman race."
http://townhall.com/columnists/byronyork/2012/08/13/when_1099_felons_vote_in_a_race_won_by_312_ballots
Here you go Sully. . . . . nothing more to say on the subject.
Sully
4:25 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Kinda sounds like what Bush Jr. did in Florida, doesn't it? But of course you probably think I'm making that up; never happened, right? I'm sure the extremely reliable townhall has something you can use as a response. Maybe you can find out something about LIBOR or tax increases under Reagan or the Koch brothers funded climate study that confirmed global warming. And maybe a little about Romney and Ryan too. Then again, it wouldn't be true, so that probably isn't a good idea.
Richard Schulte
4:05 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
"Yet Democrats across the country continue to downplay the importance of the issue. Last year, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, denounced "the gauzy accusation that voter fraud is somehow a problem, when over and over again it has been proven that you're more likely to get hit by lightning than you are to (be) a victim of voter fraud." "
http://townhall.com/columnists/byronyork/2012/08/13/when_1099_felons_vote_in_a_race_won_by_312_ballots/page/2
Well, well, well, it sounds like Sully is just a parrot-he justs repeats everything he hears. Based on Sully's definition of a fraud, that makes Sully a fraud.
Sully
4:15 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Funny how that works isn't it Rich? You believe 100 percent that your links are 100 percent accurate without even looking at any other evidence. How convenient (and simple)?for you. You really need to stop projecting yourself and your faults onto me. It's not healthy.
Richard Schulte
4:28 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Sully: "You believe 100 percent that your links are 100 percent accurate without even looking at any other evidence. How convenient (and simple)?for you."
"I did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky." President Clinton
The difference is that you are a known liar, Sully. Likewise, we see President Obama telling lie and lie after lie. Debbie Wassermann Schultz just got caught lying about Ryan's Medicare Plan yesterday. It's just lie after lie after lie.
I have confidence that my sources have integrity. I also have no confidence in anything you say Sully simply because you have no integrity.
McCloud
4:30 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Funded a climate study that confirmed global warming? Since when did science conclude on this, I think I missed that day. Absolute confirmation, wow. More lies about Reagan, all side shows. Takes away the discussion about credit downgrade, record debt, stimulus waste, bankrupt green companies, record foreclosures. Face it, four years at it and things are worse now, failure.
Sully
4:39 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
McCloud, can you read? You can write, so I assume then that you just won't read the facts about King Ronald. Just like Rich- afraid to find out you've been mislead all this time.
Sully
4:33 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Yet you've never identified any lie I've told, have you Richie?
Got an answer for any of those questions, buddy?
Here- something from Fox
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/08/03/gop-fictional-voter-fraud-charges-aim-to-keeping-democrats-from-voting/
Richard Schulte
5:50 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Sully: "Yet you've never identified any lie I've told, have you Richie?"
Not enough space here on Patch to identify all the b.s. you put out here. Let's start with your name. You know all sorts of things about me after researching me thoroughly. I assume that you're afraid to tell us your name.
Richard Schulte
4:55 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
A rather interesting article on Valerie Jarrett, President Obama's adviser:
"Every insider in Chicago told Klein the same thing: Jarrett has no qualifications to be the principal advisor to the president of the United States. She doesn't understand how Washington works, how relations with Congress work, how the federal process works. She doesn't understand how the economy works, how the military works, how national security works. But she understands how Obama works.
The president turns to Valerie Jarrett for definitive advice on all these issues. She has given him terrible advice over and over, and still he turns to her."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/obamas_strange_dependence_on_valerie_jarrett.html#ixzz23YmKSgLW
Sully
6:42 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Geitner and Emanuel are much more to blame than anyone else Obama looks to. Duncan's no cup of tea either.
Sully
5:00 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Ooh, another credible site!
Hey Rich, it looks like Rush lied-
http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2012/jul/23/jeff-fitzgerald/obamacare-largest-ever-tax-middle-class-gop-us-sen/
McCloud
5:05 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
I don't need links or sites on Reagan, I watched tv the cloudy day he signed the record marginal tax rate reduction across the board, and I saw the interest rates go from 26% to 5% in 15 months, along with all the other economic indicators. You guys mess with a guy who has a memory, and an economics degree.
Sully
5:22 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
"Almost immediately upon enactment of the 1981 tax cut, Reagan came under enormous pressure to do something about the federal budget deficit. While his preferred approach was to cut spending as much as necessary, it was not politically possible to so. His aides began pressuring him to support a tax increase. Conservative activists were appalled that Reagan would even consider such a thing, but he eventually endorsed the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982. According to a Treasury Department analysis, it raised taxes by close to one percent of GDP, equivalent to $150 billion per year today, and was probably the largest peacetime tax increase in American history.[11]"
Sully
5:27 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
"According to a table in Reagan’s last budget (FY 1990), the cumulative legislated tax increase during his administration came to $132.7 billion as of 1988 ($367 billion today). This compared to a gross tax cut of $275.1 billion. Thus Reagan took back about half the 1981 tax cut with subsequent tax increases."
Sully
5:29 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
"In the end, Reagan’s tax legacy fits neither the right-wing nor left-wing pigeonholes. Although he cut taxes when he could, he raised them when he had to. That’s something self-styled Reaganites today should remember."
Richard Schulte
5:52 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
As I recall, the House Democrats led by Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill refused to make the spending cuts agreed upon.
With respect to revenue, the OMB data on the budget should tell us what happened with the budget during the Reagan years.
McCloud
5:44 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Reagan had democrats to deal with, so in order to get his bill passed he made deals with the spenders. Why Reagan discussion? Could it be his 9% GDP to barely 1% under Obama?
Sully
6:38 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Classic. Now you're making excuses; it's still the democrats fault. Good one guys.
http://www.businessinsider.com/david-stockman-paul-ryan-budget-2012-8#ixzz23YWsMTrD
(I'm sure it's the democrats fault though)
Richard Schulte
5:57 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
OMB budget data from 1789 to present:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals
Richard Schulte
6:09 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
According the OMB spread sheet, tax receipts increased 65 percent from 1981 to 1989, even thought taxes were cut.
Over that same period, 1981-1989, spending increased 68.5 percent. (That's roughly 6 to 7 percent per year when compounded-off the top of my head.)
Cutting taxes increased revenue-the data doesn't lie.
Of course, this makes perfect economic sense. Just take a look at Wal-Mart, lower prices, increased sales, increased revenue, higher profits. Ain't nothing magical about it.
Compared with Wal-Mart, supermarkets have higher prices, lower sales, lower revenue and low profits.
Any idiot should be able to figure that out, unless, of course, your attempting to cover it up (as Sully is trying to do). There's one lie Sully-I only point this out because I didn't have to do any work to find it.
McCloud
7:24 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Credit downgraded, record unemployment, record deficit spending, record foreclosures, thats all you need to know under Obama. The real problem we face now is the interest rate is artificially low since any flucuation higher as result of REAL INVESTMENT means our national debt gets clobbered. Feds will not raise it in fear therefore no loans, In 1979 our deficit spending was based on 80% interest payments towards our debt, after Obama's 5 trillion bringing it to 16 trillion, any flucuation in rates upward means the lions share of our budget is interest. This means that we may be over the cliff, thanks Barack.
Sully
7:43 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Hey Mac, I'm sure you know better than these two guys. They must be rinos, huh?
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/14/blaming-obama-for-george-w-bushs-policies/
-Bruce Bartlett, who served under Reagan, Bush Sr., Jack Kemp, and Ron Paul
http://www.businessinsider.com/david-stockman-paul-ryan-budget-2012-8#ixzz23YWsMTrD
-David Stockman, Director of the Office of Management and Budget under Reagan
Richard Schulte
8:28 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Sully: "Hey Mac, I'm sure you know better than these two guys. They must be rinos, huh?"
I guess Sully isn't bright enough to be able read the spread sheet provided by OMB. OMB provides the facts about what happened during the Reagan Administration.
Facts are facts, but I guess the Sully just can't deal with facts. "Once a fraud, always a fraud.", right Sully.
Sully
8:38 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Sure thing Richie! And your reading comprehension must be at about a second grade level if you bothered to look at the two links above, because you sure don't seem to understand them. Just more denial and refusal to acknowledge you don't know as much as you think. Another attempt to not deal with reality. Well, what else would I have expected. Got another question for you Rich. Is it against the law for U.S. presidential candidates to receive money from foreign donors?
Richard Schulte
8:58 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Sully: "And your reading comprehension must be at about a second grade level if you bothered to look at the two links above, because you sure don't seem to understand them."
***
Sully, why do you need a filter for the data? The OMB spreadsheet tells you all you need to know about what happened during the Reagan Administration. I assume that the reason is either that you're too dumb to be able to read the OMB spreadsheet and do a little arithmetic or the spreadsheet shows that you're lying. Probably both.
Sorry Sully, but you don't know what you're talking about (once again).
Sully
9:17 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Richie, these two articles aren't even about Reagan. Sorry Dude. Insult me all you want, but you'll never answer a direct question because you have no idea.
Richard Schulte
6:01 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Sully: ". . . you'll never answer a direct question because you have no idea."
Or maybe I'm just ignoring you.
Sully
1:49 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Richard, it is physically impossible for you to ignore anyone who disagrees with you, so that excuse won't work. Admit it, you only know what you are told to know or what you can repeat. You are too narrow-minded to read or listen to anything that is not already in your schemata, and you have no critical thinking skills that could enable you to tell fact from fiction. You are a politician's dream.
Tom Morrison
11:12 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
I honestly feel a little sad for people like this Richard character who blame others for their own failings and have such high expectations of being rescued by others. I hate to break it you, Mr. Schulte, but things aren't going to change much if Romney is elected.
I have a feeling that if you spent a quarter of the amount of time working at your job (if you have one), looking for one (if you don't) or simply volunteering in your local area to make a contribution to society as you do posting here on Patch you'd feel better about yourself.
It's pretty obvious that you're a sad, lonely, angry older man without a lot going for you. My advice is to join a club or sign up for match.com and look for a nice lady friend. I'm serious. You're too worked up.
Bottom line, sir: You're in control of your own destiny. Don't blame others for what goes wrong in your life and stop hoping for some one else to save you.
Richard Schulte
5:59 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Tom Morrison: "Bottom line, sir: You're in control of your own destiny. Don't blame others for what goes wrong in your life and stop hoping for some one else to save you."
***
Mr. Morrison, let me give you advice: never take advice from a liberal.
"Currently, just 58.4% of the civilian population is employed, as compared to 64.3% twelve years ago. Factoring in the growth of the population during that period, this drop represents over 22 million Americans unable to find work. Since January 2009, 74% of all new jobs created in the U.S. were in the lowest-paying sectors of the economy, thereby stifling any chance of upward mobility and growth in median income which has fallen by 9% since January 2009, and average household wealth that has declined by nearly 40% over this same period. This failure is a byproduct of a tsunami of government regulations, mandates, and taxes which has nearly destroyed the innovation and business and job-creation that made the American economy so vibrant over the latter part of the 20th century. That innovation has now moved overseas, along with over 7.5 million high-paying goods-producing jobs since 2000."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/the_childishness_of_the_american_left.html#ixzz23bvU7Kkp
One could say that George Washington and John Adams were not gainfully employed between 1776 and 1783. But, in fact, both of these men were employing their talents against an enemy. I am doing the same.
Richard Schulte
6:18 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
"A new Washington Post poll shows a whopping 74 percent of Americans believe photo identification should be required to cast a ballot in U.S. elections."
Source:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/08/14/74_percent_of_americans_beleve_voter_id_should_be_required_to_vote
Well, well, well. . . .it looks like 74 percent of Americans agree with Republicans on the voter fraud issue.
Richard Schulte
6:31 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Brilliant, simply brilliant:
"To the true believers on the left, re-electing Barack Obama is not a matter of what is or is not good for the country; rather, for the majority on the left, the primary motivation is geared solely toward defeating their sworn enemy: conservatives and Republicans, whom many falsely believe are a right-wing horde determined to create a theocracy and impose old-fashioned morality. But what they fear most from the right is a determination to reinstitute unfettered individual freedom and concomitant economic growth, which would relegate the American left to the back bench of American society.
Thus, to them, what the policies of Barack Obama and his radical minions are doing to the long-term fate of nation is immaterial as long as Obama regurgitates his support for the various causes that are near and dear to the coalition that makes up the left. There are two common threads to the belief system of American progressives: 1) an omnipotent central government controlled by them, and 2) an assumption that there is a bottomless pit of money to be siphoned from an equally bottomless pit of wealth. But this is not the same nation that experienced unprecedented prosperity from 1946 to 2007. It is not the same nation in which these narcissists on the left grew up, never knowing national adversity or trauma."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/the_childishness_of_the_american_left.html#ixzz23c5nQU56
Resident 225
3:18 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
OMG, where do you find this drivel! This is someone's opinion who it appears has never spoken to anyone who believes they are a liberal. It's this type of rhetoric that scares me, not the "two common threads..." mentioned above. Richard - you need to step away from the computer for a while and get some fresh, Florida air. It will do you good.
Richard Schulte
3:33 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
225: "OMG, where do you find this drivel! This is someone's opinion who it appears has never spoken to anyone who believes they are a liberal. It's this type of rhetoric that scares me, not the "two common threads..." mentioned above. Richard - you need to step away from the computer for a while and get some fresh, Florida air."
I'd say the analysis above has captured the essence of the progressives/Democrats and what you folks are all about-marxists.
Just Sayin
7:31 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
LOL...So you fReAkS are still at it...give it up...R&R are dead in the water.
Barack will win again. This discussion is total folly and a waste of precious time.
Find something constructive to do with your short lives.
Richard Schulte
7:40 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
"Barack will win again."
Yes, the 2012 election is going to go just like the 2010 election. Wait a minute here, the 2010 election was a Republican landslide.
Richard Schulte
12:19 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
"Say it ain't so, Joe."
"For the first time since he began running for president, Republican Mitt Romney has the support of over 40 percent of America's youth vote, a troubling sign for President Obama who built his 2008 victory with the overwhelming support of younger, idealistic voters."
Source: http://washingtonexaminer.com/a-romney-first-over-40-of-youth-vote-back-him/article/2504893#.UCueg91lREN
OMG, 40 percent of young people might vote Republican in 2012. That means they might be voting Republicans for another 50 years. Damn, another "exploding cigar" just blew up in the Democrats' face.
Richard Schulte
1:07 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
"Say it ain't so Joe." What's next.
***
"A group of former U.S. intelligence and Special Forces operatives is set to launch a media campaign, including TV ads, that scolds President Barack Obama for taking credit for the killing of Osama bin Laden and argues that high-level leaks are endangering American lives."
Source: Newsmax.com: Special Ops Group Attacks Obama over Bin Laden Bragging, Leaks
Hmmm. . . this sounds familiar, doesn't it. You didn't do that, Mr. President-the US Navy Seal got Osama.
Marco
1:10 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
I don't even like Obama but I am going to be happy when the right wingers are mad for 4 more years.
Oh yes and you can add another 4 when Hillary stuffs Ryan for the 2016 election as well.
Too funny.
Richard Schulte
3:08 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Sully: "Admit it, you only know what you are told to know or what you can repeat. You are too narrow-minded to read or listen to anything that is not already in your schemata, and you have no critical thinking skills that could enable you to tell fact from fiction."
***
Well then Sully, let me quote Marx for you:
"Before I speak, I have something important to say."
"I didn't like the play, but then I saw it under adverse conditions - the curtain was up."
"I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members."
"I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."
"I never forget a face, but in your case I'll be glad to make an exception."
Source: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/groucho_marx_2.html#SYJDioEszy0lpghH.99
Sully
3:24 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
You're really losing it, Rich. Maybe it's time to take the advice of some other posters on here and take a leave for a little while. You're posting things that are not relevant to anything now. A complete disconnect.
Richard Schulte
3:35 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Sully: "Maybe it's time to take the advice of some other posters on here and take a leave for a little while."
I have some advice for you Sully: Never take advice from a liberal (i.e., Sully).
McCloud
3:35 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
I would suggest you heed your own advice. Your posts are irrelevant to the current day struggles of the middle class. The middle class has been hardest hit from record foreclosures, record unemployment, record long 1% gdp. Its the middle class that is quickly becoming the lower class, as we shift more towards the Socialist/Communist model of two classes, rich or poor. Policies that dictate outcomes, eliminate opportunities, are unsustainable in funding, and divisive in rhetoric. Thats what hope and change gives you.
Sully
3:46 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
I guess you can't read anything that doesn't fit your schema either McCloud, otherwise you would have seen what two republicans who worked under Reagan have to say. So much denial on the right. It's hard to undo all the misconceptions that have accumulated throughout a lifetime.
Richard, you said the same thing to someone else on this thread. You're redundant too. And a waste of time. Now respond to me by quoting my own words back, and then maybe a Reagan quote or an old Saturday Night Live quote, or any number of quotes from Rush, Coulter, or any of the other windbags you so adore.
Richard Schulte
3:59 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Sully: "Now respond to me by quoting my own words back, and then maybe a Reagan quote or an old Saturday Night Live quote, or any number of quotes from Rush, Coulter, or any of the other windbags you so adore."
Liberals take themselves so seriously-they have no sense of humor.
McCloud
4:20 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
You would rather speak nonsense on Reagan, and have no answer for credit downgrade, record unemployment, record deficit spending, record foreclosures, record low 1% GDP, record failure for the guy you voted for.
Richard Schulte
6:37 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
"It comes down to this: Americans are anti-intellectual because the intellectuals are anti-American."
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/americans_are_anti-intellectual_because.html#ixzz23f1rvPL0
Prime example: Sully, PhD
Sully
7:27 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Yep, I was extremely disappointed when the USA won the gold medal in both men's and women's basketball, and that the American women swimming in relay won the gold while also setting a world record. All those darn golds in track too, what a bummer. And American football? Gosh I hate that sport even though I pay Directv for every football game every weekend with the Sunday Ticket. College football. Yeah, Alabama winning two national championships in three years, with Auburn in between, and the resurgence of Michigan and USC, and the downfall of Texas and Florida. Just hate that darn American sport. Oh and baseball? Don't get me started about "America's game". Really, St.Louis winning the world series last year even though Philly was the best team throughout the year. And those poor woeful Cubs with the curse and all. I hate America so much that I can't stand it's sports. Get this about my own father - he was actually a colonel in the U.S. army and was in WW II. He was a doctor, so just think of all those damn yanks he had to work on. He was there for D-Day too. How could he have worked on American soldiers? Yes, I really despise the country I was born in, went to school in, live in, and work in (and actually pay taxes too without looking for loopholes or stashing money in an overseas account). This damn country. Just hate it. If I could only be more like Richard.
Richard Schulte
8:11 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Sully: "This damn country. Just hate it. If I could only be more like Richard."
But Sully, you're a fraud. You proved it yesterday. You're dishonest and you support a candidate who sat in Reverend Jerimiah Wright's church for 20 years. Reverend Wright is the man who said "God damn America." How could anybody who loves America vote for a candidate who finds saying "God damn America." acceptable?
You don't believe in the 1st Amendment or the 2nd Amendment. No, sir, you and your elitist friends are anti-American.
Sully
7:42 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
You know Rich, I know more about this country than you'll ever know and I care more about this country and it's people than you even have the capacity for. I hate to see it go down the toilet because of people like you who think they k ow everything, but in actuality have no clue as to what really goes on. You and close-minded friends are the worst thing that has ever hit this country. Terror attacks do a lot of damage, but sanity can be recovered. The damage done by ideologues can last for generations and be disaster for countless number of people for a long time. Don't tell me about being American. You would prefer a one party system made up of plutocracy, oligarchy, and theocracy. That Richard, is not what the founding fathers intended.
Richard Schulte
8:37 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
You know Sully, you are a marxist. Social justice is just re-packaged marxist philosophy, but you can't even admit that.
It's rather interesting that you would talk about "the damage done by idealogues". You are an idealogue intent on bringing your marxist philosophy to America. I support the TEA party. All the TEA party does is defend the Constitution.
You bring a smile to my face with your assertion that you know more and care more about this country. Typical elitist-thinks he's always better than everybody else in the room.
You may want to read over your comments on Patch. From your comments, most anyone could tell that you're very self-impressed, arrogant and exceedingly obnoxious, yet you can't post using your real name. I'm proud of my beliefs and have no problem with anyone knowing what I think and what I believe in. My posts bear my name.
You make an excellent parrot-parroting your marxist beliefs.
"The problem with liberals is not that they know so much, but that they know so much that isn't true." Ronald Reagan
Reagan was speaking directly to you Sully.
Terri
9:54 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Reagan is rolling over in his grave knowing you tea party kooks have hijacked the republican party. His own SON supports Obama. Love the fictional character you've all created for Willard's opponent. Obama's spending record is right of Reagan's. http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/03/obamas-spending-record-more-conservative-than-reagans.html. You say you love America, but you create petitions urging small businesses not to hire workers to make Obama look bad. Sick, sick, sick. You are traitors to your country and an embarrassment overseas. You wrap yourselves in the American flag and your bibles, but there's not a patriotic or christian bone in your bodies. Our founding fathers are weeping with Reagan.
As for the more intellectual party, the verdict is in. But, you won't read the link because it's published by scientists and we know how you tea partiers despise facts, knowledge and scientific evidence. http://www.americanscientist.org/science/pub/study-are-liberals-smarter-than---conservatives
Nightcrawler
12:06 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
I see the resident nutjob is back.
Sully
7:48 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Yes, and with another new name too.
Jerry Pech
3:11 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Terri...I read the article in your link...quite an interesting fellow... this Satoshi Kanazawa. In the future you may want to do some research of your own on the authors of articles you choose to share...especially when you try to use that article to prove a point...the guy's a bit of a kook. You won't do any research on him since you found the one thing he did that fits your view of the world. But if you do happen to do some research on him....let us all know what you think of his other "research"
Nightcrawler
3:22 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
What difference does it make what my name says?
I mean, your party fully supports voting without ID, so how is that okay, yet you're telling me I'm not allowed toeven have an OPINION without revealing my name?
You are a huuuuuuuuuge hypocrite Sully.
Richard Schulte
7:26 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Terri: "You are traitors to your country and an embarrassment overseas. You wrap yourselves in the American flag and your bibles, but there's not a patriotic or christian bone in your bodies."
The Founding Fathers were considered to be traitors too.
Donny
8:55 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012
RS you win the funniest post of them all here. HA!
Donny
8:10 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012
November is looking really good, I mean REALLY good my fellow Americans. It's time for some R&R.
Terri
8:20 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012
So now your calling the founding fathers traitors to America? Or are you referring to their being traitors to England? If it's the latter, that doesn't help your case.
Nightcrawler
3:24 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Love it when people post things that make no sense, like Terri's posts above.
You don't even understand what you are debating, clearly. So amusing.
McCloud
9:00 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012
The more intellectual party? Which one is that, the one you are a member of? Thanks for pointing that out, since it was clearly not evident from your writing.
McCloud
9:05 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Now they are blaming small business owners for Obama's failures? Good grief, at least this forum educates us on some of the crack pot slime bag garbage loonies out there are serving up.
Richard Schulte
12:44 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Terri: "You wrap yourselves in the American flag and your bibles, but there's not a patriotic or christian bone in your bodies."
***
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams
*** http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/john_adams_2.html#3qZPMvwbRZj2YOSq.99
***
The left's anti-religion bent is evident in Terri's post. Sounds much like Obama's "guns and bibles" quote.
Sully
1:10 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Since you like quotes so much, Rich, here's one for you, in a couple of variations-
"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross."
"it will not be identified with any "shirt" movement, nor with an "insignia," but it will probably be "wrapped up in the American flag and heralded as a plea for liberty and preservation of the constitution."[1]"
"When and if fascism comes to America it will not be labeled "made in Germany"; it will not be marked with a swastika; it will not even be called fascism; it will be called, of course, "Americanism." "
Sully
1:29 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Instead of Americanism, it's called nationalism. The author of this quote (credited to Sinclair Lewis, but he got it from someone else) was quite prescient.
Richard Schulte
2:55 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." George Orwell
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/george_orwell.html#sDiVqjgsZ8BheOSe.99
Sully is immersed in Crook County, yet he has no understanding that Chicago/Crook County is already a fascist government. It is Democrats who are the modern day fascists and Obama is attempting to bring Crook County fascism to the entire nation.
How can small government conservatives be fascists? The two concepts are mutually exclusive.
I guess I just committed a revolutionary act by telling the truth about fascism and Crook County.
Doug Purington
1:19 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
You know what worries me even more than the specter of Romney and Ryan? All those who think like them and accept all their lies as truths!
Richard Schulte
3:15 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Doug Purington: "You know what worries me even more than the specter of Romney and Ryan? All those who think like them and accept all their lies as truths!"
You know what worries me? The Federal Government has to borrow $4 Billion everyday to pay it's bill. The Federal Goverment is already $16 trillion in debt. How do we pay that back? With the Federal Goverment $16 trillion in debt and borrowing $4 billion every day to pay its bills, there is only one conclusion which can be reached-the Federal Government is bankrupt. What happens when China stops lending the US money to finance its debt?
But it's far worse than that. California and Illinois are also bankrupt. And so is the once great City of Chicago. What happens when California, Illinois and Chicago stop paying their bills because they are out of money?
Nightcrawler
3:26 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
@Doug: You wanna lecture us about lies?
February, 2009: Barack Obama PROMISED the American people he'd have the deficit cut in half by the end of his first term.
I guess that does't count as a lie, and I am using a specific example almost word-for word that you can easliy go look up on youtube.
Sully
1:23 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
How can one person harbor so much hate against at least half of the American population? Rich, you don't even know these people, yet you claim you do. Anti-religion? TrIaitors? Why, because Rush, Malkin, and Coulter say so? Who the hell are they? Who made them right? They're making millions off of your ignorance. These heroes of yours make these claims and you take them on as your own. You are one sorry man. Have you ever had a single thought that was your own?
McCloud
2:27 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Lies? Like the recent commercial about how Romney murdered someone? Or perhaps it was the one about after passing the healthcare bill premium would drop $2,000? Or the one where passage of the stimulus was immediatly necessary and unemployment would go below 8% then under 6%? Perhaps you were referring to the reuction of 700 billion from medicare to pay for Obamacare counted twice for OMB scoring. Or maybe the OMB score of 1 trillion is now close to 3 in projections. Which lie are you speaking of?
Terri
3:18 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Here's a quote Richard: "I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do, because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony
Not anti-religion, just anti-bigots using religion to sell their hate and greed. True Christians believe the exact opposite what you spew. The teachings of Jesus are those of love, forgiveness, tolerance and taking care of the poor. Basically, the antithesis of the current GOP platform.
Richard Schulte
8:03 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Terri: "The teachings of Jesus are those of love, forgiveness, tolerance and taking care of the poor. Basically, the antithesis of the current GOP platform."
Democrats believe in hand-outs to help the poor (and buy votes). Republicans (conservatives) believe in providing the poor a "hand-up". If you are poor, and I am, would you rather have a "hand-out" from a politician who wants to control you or would you rather have a job. Keep your hand-out, I don't want it. I want to go back to work.
Accepting hand-outs takes away your self-respect. A job provides you with self-respect. Children accept hand-outs. Adults don't want hand-outs, they prefer a job.
Why do Democrats insist on treating adults like children? That's an easy question, they buy votes with their hand-outs.
Richard Schulte
3:28 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
OMG, look at this. One by one, the swing states are lining up in the Romney column.
"Mitt Romney's choice of Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan has reversed the presidential polling in the state, pushing the Republican over President Obama for the first time. It has also pushed Romney to his highest-ever level of support in politically-progressive Wisconsin."
http://washingtonexaminer.com/after-ryan-pick-romney-leading-in-wisconsin/article/2505104#.UC05_mzCz8B
Terri
3:31 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Just because Satoshi Kanazawa is controversial, this does not invalidate his findings as published in a respected, scientific journal. It's not like he's David Barton falsely claiming to be a historian. Here's an interesting graph: http://www.upworthy.com/so-whos-really-smarter-democrats-or-republicans-heres-your-definitive-answer
Richard Schulte
6:04 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Who's smarter, Democrats or Republicans? Before you answer that question, you have to define what the term "smarter" means. And then you need to define the terms "Democrat" and "Republican".
Simply because one has a high I.Q, does that make you smart? Simply because one has a PhD, does that make you smart? (Sully is a PhD and he ain't very bright.) If you have a high net worth, does that mean that you're smart. I'd say that it's not possible to definitively answer the question.
In previous Patch posts, I have said that more educated people are more conservative. I believe that is true, with one exception, academics tend to lean to the radical left. Are academics more intelligent that others? They might be, but when it comes to common sense, I'd say academics are highly deficient. (Once again, Sully is the classic example of a PhD with little common sense-his wife doesn't let him go out when it rains because she is afraid that he'll drown-just like a turkey.)
Of course these are generalities and there will always be exceptions.
Sully
8:08 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Who'd you steal this from Richie? Your post about whose smarter, that is.
Tim Froehlig
3:39 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
I was going to stay out of this conversation/debate, but I want to make just one post.
Regardless of what side you are on, stop and watch this. Click on the 1:30 minute mark and listen to the promise that's made to the American people. The left has zero right to be accusing anyone of lying when you watch this video, because this is the biggest lie of them all. Honestly, this video should be a repeating Romney ad:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jJvkkNmR_8
Tim Froehlig
3:43 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
For those who don't want to click on the link...
Obama, in February of 2009 said, word-for-word: "And that's why today I'm pledging to cut the deficit we inherited, by half, by the end of my first term in office."
That's all I have to say. That's all I should need to say. It kind of speaks for itself. Enjoy the rest of your debate, everyone.
Sully
4:32 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Hey Tim! I've been wondering where you were. How are things going for you these days?
Tim Froehlig
5:18 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
It's football and school season, so starting to become very busy, thanks for asking.
Sully
4:39 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Oh yeah- got another quote for ya. "read my lips..." remember that one? What politician of either party keeps all of his or her campaign promises? Granted, Bush Sr. was one and done, but there are so many things that were outside of his control, and are outside of Obama's control, that keeping those frivolous promises is just about impossible. Obama has not had the support of congress, which makes things very difficult.
Sully
4:46 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
And Tim, I don't believe Obama went into this intending to lie. He set the bar too high for himself. What's he going to say? And again, with a congress opposing his every move and the gentleman from Kentucky stating his only job during Obama's term was to keep him from getting re-elected, the congress is just as much to blame.
Tim Froehlig
5:18 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
And Bush's comment cost him re-election.
Tim Froehlig
5:24 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Congress may be opposing a lot of his moves, but it's no different than congress coming up with a budget and the Dems refusing to pass it. It works both ways.
Regardless of whether or not he was intending to lie, it was a totally irresponsible statement. And I only shared it to illustrate the fact that if people want to call out Romney for things they deem "lies," they had better take a long hard look at their own leader, because most of their claims are based on assumptions that haven't even taken place yet.
My post was based on a factual situation that actually has already taken place.
My big concern with Obama's comment was that it shows his clear lack of understanding of just how dire a situation we are in if he was naive enough to truly believe he could wipe out half the national debt in three years in the first place.
With that, I better go.
Time to go out and get some exercise in at one of the area's great forest preserves before it gets too late. Plus, I really don't want to get too involved in this debate. I spend enough time in front of my computer working as it is.
Sully
4:42 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Hey Rich- take a lesson from Tim. He and I agree on just about nothing, but he answers questions and defends his position. He doesn't use quotes and talking points as his one and only reply to every query.
Richard Schulte
5:32 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
The age of Obama:
"In the age of Facebook and Twitter, a new crime has hit America: "Sharpie parties," gatherings of revelers armed with "Sharpie" magic markers and lured by social media invitations to wreak havoc on foreclosed homes."
Source: http://www.cnbc.com/id/48688084
Stuff like this didn't happen when President Bush was in the White House. My home in Evanston was foreclosed on. I don't blame the bank. I would never do anything thing like this.
Sully
5:50 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
What the hell are you talking about Rich? Is everything the fault of politicians? Considering what one republican said, that Obama needed to take responsibility for the drought, maybe that is all you can see. Every single thing in the world revolves around republicans and democrats. Everything good is due to republicans, everything bad, democrats. Now that is truly black and white thinking. You're even sadder than I thought. What a waste.
Richard Schulte
6:17 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Sully: "Is everything the fault of politicians?"
When Bush was president, everything was President Bush's fault. If that's how Dems want to play the game, then we'll use the Dem rules. Yes, everything that happens when Obama is president is his fault.
Now that Obama is president, Obama thinks that everything that happens is still Bush's fault. Sorry, but Obama is a "miserable failure"-he made this mess. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (DWS) said that Obama "owns" this economy and DWS is correct. It's Obama economy now and the economy is sinking once again and Obama is sinking right along with the economy. That's just too bad, isn't it?
Richard Schulte
6:21 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
" "Ryan has fired up the base," said Gruschow, after speaking to friends in the evangelical Christian community and the Tea Party who he said had been a little hesitant, a little concerned, about Romney. "I think now that Ryan has been selected as his running mate, there's a lot of enthusiasm. He is a Tea Party guy."
Another of the Tea Party founders, Ryan Rhodes, also backed the vice-presidential pick. "I have seen a lot of people excited by Paul Ryan. He has given them a reason to vote. I think it would have been different if he had chosen Chris Christie [the New Jersey governor who is closer to the centre]. You would have seen a lot of people standing by." "
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/16/romney-gamble-paul-ryan-vicepresident
Thumbs up TEA party! The TEA party carried Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker over the finish line (even with busloads of Democrats from Illinois going up to Wisconsin to vote). The TEA party will carry Romney over the finish line too.
Richard Schulte
6:34 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Sully: ". . . .Considering what one republican said, that Obama needed to take responsibility for the drought. . . "
Hmmm, I thought that Hurricane Katrina was Bush's fault. If Bush was responsible for Katrina, then it is only logical that Obama take responsibility for the drought.
Of course, Sully is shading things here. Obama has made the decision not to lift the ethanol mandate (in gasoline) even though the corn crop has been damaged by the drought. The decision not to lift the ethanol mandate will cause food prices to rise worldwide. A spike in food prices will cause many of the world's poor to go hungry and may even cause thousands of poor people to die to starvation.
Does Obama have 'blood on his hands' because he doesn't care about poor people starving? Well Terri, that's a question that you should ponder. It's obvious if you care about poor people that the ethanol mandate should be lifted.
Using corn to make ethanol for automobile fuel is an idea dreamed up by the kooks. It makes absolutely no sense to turn food into fuel, particularly when there is plenty of natural gas and oil in North America. The US is the Saudi Arabia of natural gas.
Honda will be selling a Civic which runs on CNG (compressed natural gas) in the next few months, if Honda isn't already selling a Civic fueled with CNG. CNG is the vehicle fuel of the future. CNG powered vehicles will be mass produced if Romney wins the presidency.
Sully
7:47 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
And the republicans in the house blocked the farm bill that was passed by the senate that would give relief to farmers effected by the drought. Won't that affect food prices too? Now Richie, you keep saying the dems talk too much about Bush, but you ain't doing no different. Just your same old excuses.
I'm sure you have proof of people from Illinois being bused to Wisconsin to vote, right? Let's see it big guy. And just how much money did Walker get from out of state donors, by the way?
Richard Schulte
6:56 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
From Rasmussen today:
Ohio: Romney 45% / Obama 45%
Wisconsin: Romney 48% / Obama 47%
Iowa: Romney 46% / Obama 44%
Florida: Romney 45% / Obama 43%
Virginia: Obama 48% / Romney 46%
North Carolina: Romney 49% / Obama 44%
Colorado: Romney 47% / Obama 47%
As the economy sinks further into the abyss because of Obama, Romney/Ryan will just keep looking better and better in the polls. President Romney, Speaker Boehner and Majority Leader McConnell, now that's sweet. The stock market will soar on Wednesday, November 7th. The recession ends on the evening of November 6th.
Elect2012
7:01 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Yes, they do need to ban all ethanol fuel sale for the 85 product. As far as the CNG powered cars are concerned, a CNG kit to convert Civic, Corolla and other smaller cars can be bought for around 3K. It is widely used in developing countries in Asia and Africa. It still lets you switch to gasoline if CNG is not available.
Richard Schulte
7:24 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
I got the information on the Honda Civic with the CNG powered engine from the manager at Castle Honda in Morton Grove. There are already CNG fueling stations in northern Crook County near Morton Grove.
$3 thousand for a conversion kit to CNG is a lot of money to spend. If I owned a gasoline-powered Civic or Corolla (and I do), I'd wait until I needed a new car. At $3/gallon of gasoline , $3 thousand would buy 1,000 gallons of gasoline. That would be about 35,000 miles in either a Civic or Corolla.
CNG-powered vehicles are the future. You can forget about solar-panel powered cars or cars powered by a wind turbine. CNG-powered vehicles sales will swamp the Chevy Volt and the Nissan Leaf.
Richard Schulte
7:30 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
" “Obama’s dead and the American auto industry is alive,” [Governor] Quinn said before correcting himself to say “Osama bin Laden” is dead. “Guess I won’t use that one again,” the governor said."
Source: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-15/news/chi-unions-protest-democrats-at-illinois-state-fair-20120815_1_pension-systems-pension-reform-pat-quinn
Actually, Governor Quinn was right the first time-Obama is toast.
Sully
8:01 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Here ya go Rich - looks like foreclosures didn't just begin when Obama took office. I'm sure no one has to explain this to you.
Home foreclosures. Housing starts
Bush 2001 674,550. 1,602,700
Bush 2005 483,940. 2,068,300
Bush 2007. 977,132. 1,353,700
Change from 2001-2005 +45%. -16%
Change from 2005 to 2007. +102%. -35%
Sources: For foreclosures: Authors’ calculations based on US Census Bureau and Mortgage Bankers Association data. For home starts: Authors’ calcula- tions based on US Census Bureau data. Additional details provided in appendix.
Sully
8:14 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Since it didn't come out clearly in the columns, I'll sum it up.
From 2001 to 2005, home foreclosures rose by 45 percent, while housing starts decreased 16 percent. From 2005 to 2007, home foreclosures rose 102 percent, while housing starts declined 35 percent. Get that Richie?
Stop blaming Obama for your failures.
Richard Schulte
6:57 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
What's your point?
Sully
8:03 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Too dense to figure out the point on your own? Okay, try to follow- under Bush Jr. The number of foreclosures rose sharply while housing starts declined. Was that Obama's fault? The economy started falling apart under Bush. Do you understand? Obama hasn't been successful in fully fixing the problem, but he did not start it. Now try to think about that too Rich. Not what your favorite pundits say, but what YOU think. You claim to have common sense. Use it then.
McCloud
8:36 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Did anything get better under Obama or do we just settle for failures?
Sully
9:17 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
No McCloud, we don't settle for failures. We the people demand our politicians to stop posturing and do what we hired them to do. Stop blocking everything the other party does and compromise. It worked before and it could work again. The media has to stop being propaganda machines and actually present the news. Not an opinion about the news, but the actual facts. The parties have to stop this ultrapartisonship in both government and society. Otherwise, we'll keep going down the slippery slope until theremis no hope for climbing back up.
Richard Schulte
6:33 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Sully: "We the people demand our politicians to stop posturing and do what we hired them to do. Stop blocking everything the other party does and compromise. It worked before and it could work again. The media has to stop being propaganda machines and actually present the news. Not an opinion about the news, but the actual facts."
Or, as an alternative, Obama and the Democrats could stop ruling against the will of the people. The message sent by the voters in the 2010 elections was clear-the 2010 elections were a Republican landslide. The results of the recall election in Wisconsin also sent a clear message-Scott Walker won the recall election with a larger percentage of the vote against the same opponent. (Walker's reforms have been so effective that even Illinois Governor Quinn (D) is adopting the same reforms.)
After the 2012 election, the Obama and the Democrats will no longer be able to obstruct what's good for America. The 2012 election will be another Republican landslide.
Why should Republicans compromise with Democrats when the policies advocated by Democrats don't work. That would be foolish.
Richard Schulte
6:49 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Sully: "Stop blocking everything the other party does and compromise."
The agenda advocated by Democrats is harmful to both the US economy and to American society as a whole. Why should the opposition compromise with an agenda that is harmful to America?
Obamacare is not about health care, but rather expanding government. The purpose of Obamacare is to give the Federal Government control over Americans in the same way that Chicago's thug government operates. Obama is working on brining Chicago's thug government to the entire nation.
No compromise with Democrats.
Sully
7:58 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Rich, another question- what percentage of the American population actually voted in 2010?
Richard Schulte
6:57 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Sully: "And the republicans in the house blocked the farm bill that was passed by the senate that would give relief to farmers effected by the drought. Won't that affect food prices too?"
How does the "farm bill" affect the supply of corn that is available for food? (The corn crop was planted 3 months. Taking action in August is 3 months too late to increase the supply of corn available for food.)
It would appear that Sully doesn't know anything about raising corn or the law of supply and demand.
Sully
7:56 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
It appears Richard doesn't know where a good bit of our food comes from. Ethanol wasn't the only issue, but I understand you are only capable of one idea at a time.
Such a waste of time. I must be a masochist.
Richard Schulte
7:08 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
President Obama: "And I don't think you or anybody who's been watching the campaign would say that in any way we have tried to divide the country. We've always tried to bring the country together," President Obama said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight."
The most polarizing president in my memory claims he's not working on trying to "divide" the country. Not only is President Obama trying to "divide" the country, it would appear that President Obama is trying to destroy the country. Obama is nothing more than a thug politicians.
Another Obama lie.
Sully
7:50 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Davis is a suck-up, Rich. Always was. I wonder who paid him and how much to switch parties.
The most polarized president because Fox and other right wing pundits say so. Try thinking about that for a minute or two if you can.
Gee, I wonder if Ryan or Romney have ever lied. Naw, what could I be thinking. What'd do you think, Rich? Has a republican ever lied? Through omission or commission?
McCloud
7:23 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Stop blocking everything the other party does and compromise? Like when the Republicans caved to pass the debt ceiling increase based on Democrat threats that our credit rating was at stake if there was no compromise? I think you know the rest of that story. The Tea Party was labeled racists after their point turned out correct.
Richard Schulte
7:42 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Calling someone a racist is standard operating procedure for Democrats. I think that voting for a candidate based upon the color of their skin is racist.
Sully
7:43 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
How about the republican party stop filibustering everything the president tries to do? Regarding the debt ceiling, every other president had no opposition. Why all of the sudden this one? The dems were right too. Tea partiers were labeled racists far before that even happened.
Sully
7:54 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
I guess all the signs at tea party events were just democrat plants.
Jerry Pech
9:41 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Sully says: "Regarding the debt ceiling, every other president had no opposition. Why all of the sudden this one?"
First...you couldn't be more wrong...do a little research. You can find quotes and/or votes from nearly every long term politician (both parties) against raising the debt ceiling...ironically, at the time they speak up against it, the current President is always a member of the "other" party...shocker.
For instance, in 2006 the current President said: "The fact that we’re here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure."
So either, by his own definition, he's a failure or he's just a hypocrite. Or like most politicians, of either party, he's both.
I hope this answers your question.
I would also like to add...just because all his predecessors made bad decisions with the debt ceiling, driving this country to the brink of bankruptcy, doesn't mean he should continue down the same path. It's like when one of my kids tells me...."Johnny's parents let's him stay out until 3:00am and let's him have all the junkfood he wants, why can't I." Sorry I'm not that dad.
Richard Schulte
7:26 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
A former Democrat Congressman from Alabama who switched to the Republican Party:
"Davis, 44, who served in the House as a Democrat from Alabama from 2003 to 2011, said in a telephone interview that he has been given a speaking slot at the Aug. 27-30 Republican convention in Tampa."
" "President Obama - Senator Obama - ran on two broad themes," Davis said. "One of those broad themes was reunifiying this country. And another broad theme was turning this economy around.... I'll certainly be talking about those two failures." "
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/08/al_congressman_who_supported_obama_in_2008_to_speak_at_gop_convention.html#ixzz23o0fI31I
Not that the color of Davis' skin changes any thing, but Davis is black folk.
McCloud
7:52 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Because everything the President does damages our country, adding more debt and no change to GDP stagnant at 1%. The credit downgrade resulted from massive increase in deficit spending, what part of that do you not understand? True, the Tea Party was labeled early on, when political hacks could not fathom we the people demanding the spending stop.
Sully
8:18 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Sorry Mac, the downgrade was not due to deficit spending. It was due to the political uncertainty within the government.
Richard Schulte
7:54 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Democrats can't talk about the economy, so it's the race card:
" “That really bothered me,” he said. “You notice he said anger twice. He’s really trying to use racial coding and access some really deep stereotypes about the angry black man. This is part of the playbook against Obama, the ‘otherization,’ he’s not like us.”
“I know it’s a heavy thing, I don’t say it lightly, but this is ‘niggerization,’” Touré said to the apparent shock of his co-panelists. “You are not one of us, you are like the scary black man who we’ve been trained to fear.” "
Source: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbcs-toure-to-panel-romney-engaging-in-the-niggerization-of-obama/
So now the Obama campaign is calling Romney a "racist" because he's white and Republican. No, that's not being divisive.
Richard Schulte
8:13 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Oh no, say it ain't so Joe:
" “We are united in calling on the governor to treat employees fairly and to recognize the importance of the vital services they provide,” said Michael Carrigan, president of the stateAFL-CIO.
“We are extremely disturbed that at a time when collective bargaining rights for public employees are under attack by a number of Republican governors, here in Illinois we have a Democratic governor who is undermining fundamental collective bargaining rights for public employees,” Carrigan said.
Other union leaders simply said their members had no faith in Quinn."
Hmmm. . . not much to say. Quinn is adopting Governor Scott Walker's policies (because it's absolutely necessary to do so).
McCloud
8:24 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Ok, its good to know what crack pots on your side use to explain failure like the credit downgrade. No worries, keep spending, its all the other Party's fault. Good grief, you are too far gone to continue discussion.
Sully
8:28 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
From S&P-
"The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over fiscal policy. Despite this year's wide-ranging debate, in our view, the differences between political parties have proven to be extraordinarily difficult to bridge, and, as we see it, the resulting agreement fell well short of the comprehensive fiscal consolidation program that some proponents had envisaged until quite recently. Republicans and Democrats have only been able to agree to relatively modest savings on discretionary spending while delegating to the Select Committee decisions on more comprehensive measures. It appears that for now, new revenues have dropped down on the menu of policy options. In addition, the plan envisions only minor policy changes on Medicare and little change in other entitlements, the containment of which we and most other independent observers regard as key to long-term fiscal sustainability."
Sully
8:30 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Fox may have put all the blame on the dems, but what would you expect from a propaganda machine funded by the right?
Sully
8:26 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Another quote for you, Rich, by President Reagan (Labor Day speech in New Jersey, 1980). Take a look at the first line.
"They remind us that where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost. They remind us that freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. You and I must protect and preserve freedom here or it will not be passed on to our children. Today the workers in Poland are showing a new generation not how high is the price of freedom but how much it is worth that price."
So Rich, are you going to answer the question about Ryan or Romney ever lying?
Nick
9:49 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
http://247wallst.com/2011/09/14/americas-poorest-states/2/
Hi Sully,
The ten states listed in that article are all red states. These states that are red, are blaming Obama for their poverty, but fail to make any investments on themselves for the future! How hypocritical are these states? Not wanting welfare or health insurance for everyone, but they are the first to use and abuse the system!
Richard Schulte
6:04 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Interesting article, but there is an obvious flaw in the analysis. A dollar in those 10 poorest states buys a lot more than in other states.
I just recently relocated from Evanston to the Panhandle of Florida. The housing costs are about half of the cost of housing in Evanston. Gasoline is 75 cents per gallon cheaper than in Evanston. The cost of food is about 30 percent less.
In other words, with respect to median incomes, the article appears to be comparing high-cost of living dollars to low-cost of living dollars as if they are equal in purchasing power.
Richard Schulte
9:55 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Jerry Pech: Senator Barack Obama: "The fact that we’re here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure."
Thank you Mr. Pech for reminding us of what Senator Obama had to say about raising the debt ceiling when President Bush was in office.
"a leadership failure", got that everyone. So, according to Senator Barack Obama, President Obama's request to raise the debt ceiling was "a leadership failure". It would appear that President Obama agrees with McCloud and disagrees with His Majesty, the King of Bullshit, King Sully.
Jim
10:33 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
The libs have basically ruined the country with their incessant pandering to base human tendencies. The Republicans have contributed too but perhaps not as greatly. Obama and his ilk will have it completely ruined in no time if he is reelected. Mitt might slow it down a bit but the US is on the downhill side and probably cannot be reconstituted without complete collapse and a start-over. Then I suppose the voters or the mobs will be looking for a dictator to preserve order while history recycles itself.
Katz
10:54 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
As Ronald Reagan said, “It’s not that liberals are ignorant. It’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63220.html#ixzz1Xlr6XqdD
Katz
10:43 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Romney's Free Market vs. Obama's Socialism
Romney's Bain Capital invested PRIVATE money in: AMC Entertainment, Burger King, Burlington Coat Factory, Dominos Pizza, Dunkin Donuts Staples, Toys "R" Us etc.
Obama's Invested TAXPAYER money in: Solyndra - Bankrupt, Ener 1 - Bankrupt, Beacon Power - Bankrupt, Abound Solar - Bankrupt, Amonix Solar - Bankrupt, I could go on buy why? All of these companies were Obama Campaign contributors.
Choice is clear...Do you want a businessman who generated billions or a president who wasted trillions. Lets not forget Obama and his people got their money back, it's the taxpayers that lost!
Katz
10:55 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Obama is the idealogue.
With millions of citizens out of work Obama just granted amnesty to millions of illegal aliens even though he has no authority to do so and they are lining up in droves for work permits and free government benefits paid for by already jobless and broke citizens while OBAMA BORROWS OVER $ ONE TRILLION/ YEAR TO PAY BENEFITS TO ILLEGAL ALIENS AND OTHER DEMOCRAT SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS AND DENIES STATES THE RIGHT TO CHECK IF VOTERS ARE LEGAL CITIZENS WITH VOTER ID.
Do those ObamaAmnestyForms ask if the illegal applicant ever voted in an election? If Obama had any honesty they should and there would be Federal Officers there to arrest anybody who checks "yes." Does anybody have any doubt whatsoever that Obama's illegal aunt and illegal uncle voted for Obama and are unindicted felons? Where is the MSNBC and NBC reporting on that breaking story? We already know Obama's illegal aunt was receiving free Section 8 housing and other federal and state government benefits so Obama KNOWS all these illegals are stealing not only our jobs but our money.
CHICAGOLAND: Thousands line up for Obama amnesty program...
Just think of all those citizens who will remain unemployed because Obama favors illegal aliens over hard working citizens.
Katz
10:58 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Former congressman Artur Davis, who officially seconded President Obama’s nominationat the 2008 Democratic convention, said Wednesday that he will cap a remarkable political metamorphosis by addressing the Republican convention this month — calling for Obama’s defeat.Davis, 44, who served in the House as a Democrat from Alabama from 2003 to 2011, said in a telephone interview that he has been given a speaking slot at the Aug. 27-30 Republican convention in Tampa. But Davis said he planned to speak for millions of Americans who, like him, had traced a path from hope to disillusionment with Obama. After spending his entire political career as a Democrat, Davis declared in May that he has become a Republican.Davis has since become a vocal advocate for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney in Virginia, where he now lives. On Wednesday, he spoke on Romney’s behalf at an event in Ballston, attacking Vice President Biden for a recent comment that Republicans would put voters “back in chains.”Davis accused Biden on Wednesday of spreading “racial viciousness” and said the vice president’s comment “ought to embarrass President Obama.” He said in a CNN interview: “It’s a divisive tactic that’s insulting to African Americans. It’s insulting to the American people.” He added, “It was wrong ... and the president ought to say it was wrong.”
Jennifer Fisher
11:19 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Folks, we love that readers are so engaged in the comments section here, but I wanted to remind you all that our terms of service prohibit language that is "is defamatory, abusive, obscene, profane or offensive," or "is threatening, harassing or that promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual." (http://evanston.patch.com/terms) A reader contacted me saying he or she saw some language of that sort in the comments on this article. I scanned the comments on this article and deleted a handful because they didn't meet our terms of use. The reader used a fake e-mail address, so I can't respond to him or her directly.
Sully
11:55 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
My apologies Jennifer!
Jennifer Fisher
12:08 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
No harm, no foul. Thanks for participating in the discussion so actively!
Richard Schulte
12:13 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Patch Editor: "The reader used a fake e-mail address, so I can't respond to him or her directly."
So the King of B.S., Sully, is using a fake e-mail address so he can comment on Patch. The King of B.S., His Majesty Sully, is also the King of Fraud.
Sully
12:27 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Of course Richard.
I don't need a fake email. I can post with the one I have.
Sully
12:31 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Rich, you have definitely gone off the deep end. Enjoy using the new word I taught you (fraud). Glad to be of service.
McCloud
12:40 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
S, you went off the deep end way back in this thread. Your attempts to attribute credit downgrade to political conflict is straight from the mouths of the LSD channel. Somehow you think that spending had nothing to do with a credit downgrade is like a foreclosure on a house has nothing to do with lack of making payments.
Sully
1:19 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Did I make up the quote, McCloud? No, I didn't. You refuse to see what's right in front of you. It doesn't matter how many direct quotes or links I give, you won't believe them. Links I can understand, but direct quotes?
McCloud
2:04 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Looks to me that they were concerned about discretionary spending, but hey if Rachel on LSD says its not anything to do with the spending take a green pill and live it man.
Sully
3:07 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Actually discretionary spending was the one area where they saw the parties somewhat agreeing. It was everything else the S&P was worried about.
McCloud
3:33 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Everything else but massive spending, that had nothing to do with it. Is that how Rachel mommy bird spit it out into your mouth? The loons who watch that freak show and make comments here make for some real head scatchin.
Sully
4:02 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
First of all, what are you talking about? Who is Rachel?
Mac, you go ahead and believe what you will. As I said, you don't see what's right in front of you.
Richard Schulte
4:34 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
OMG, look at this:
" “I think Paul [Ryan], for example, the head of the Budget Committee, has looked at the budget and has made a serious proposal. I’ve read it. I can tell you what’s in it and there’s some ideas in there that I would agree with but there’s some ideas we should have a healthy debate about because I don’t agree with them. The major driver of our long-term liabilities, everybody here knows, is Medicare and Medicaid and our health care spending. Nothing comes close,” said President Obama at the GOP retreat on January 29, 2010."
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/17/sebelius-paul-ryans-medicare-reform-plan-a-serious-proposal-video/#ixzz23qDrl17I
Well, we see that President Obama agrees with Vice-Presidential candidate Paul Ryan that Medicare and Medicaid are a problem. Paul Ryan has a plan. What is the President's plan? Oh yeah, Obama's plan is to just get through the next election and then let Medicare and Medicaid just go broke.
McCloud
4:54 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Lets see, the credit rating agency S&P downgraded us, and it had nothing to do with massive spending. I'm signing off.
Richard Schulte
4:54 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Is Paul Ryan more qualified to be the Vice President than Joe Biden? Well the answer to that question is obvious.
The real question is whether Joe Biden is more qualified that Barack Obama to be President. That question is not so easy to answer, but after thinking about it a little, I've come to the conclusion that Biden is much more qualified that Obama to be President.
With respect to Romney, the question is whether he has sufficient experience to be the President-after all, Romney has no community organizing experience.
Richard Schulte
4:56 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
I have to give credit where credit is due-I heard both of those jokes on the Rush Limbaugh show today. I thought both of those comments were hillarious.
Richard Schulte
5:10 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
OMG, Sarah Palin is now in charge of Obama's re-election strategy:
"Barack Obama had the chance to replace Biden with Hillary Clinton, a move which would have energized the Dem base. But he could not be seen agreeing with or taking the advice of Sarah Palin, who suggested that Biden's "chains" remark should earn him a firing. When Palin appeared on Fox and said that Biden should go, Obama had to keep him. Palin forced his hand.
The dummy Palin outsmarted Professor Obama once again. Heh."
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/08/joe_biden_twisting_in_the_wind.html#ixzz23qMxWCpU
So if Sarah Palin is dumb and Sarah Palin out-foxed Obama, what does that make Obama? Hmmmm. . . .dumber than Sarah Palin. Well now, how about that?
Richard Schulte
6:05 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Did Obama really get Osama? Not according to this former Navy Seal:
"It is my civic duty to tell the president to stop leaking national security secret to the enemy," former Navy SEAL Benjamin Smith says in the ad. "Mr. President, you did not kill Osama bin Laden, America did. The work that the American military has done killed Osama bin Laden. You did not."
Source: http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/08/16/special_forces_to_obama_you_didnt_kill_osama_bin_laden_america_did
I'm afraid I have to agree with Benjamin Smith-the Navy Seals got Osama.
Sully
7:32 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Who gave the order Rich? Here's the unedited quote, by the way-
Obama did not take the credit, but I don't expect you to believe that.
"Tonight, we give thanks to the countless intelligence and counterterrorism professionals who’ve worked tirelessly to achieve this outcome … We give thanks for the men who carried out this operation, for they exemplify the professionalism, patriotism, and unparalleled courage of those who serve our country. And they are part of a generation that has borne the heaviest share of the burden since that September day.”
Richard Schulte
5:41 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Sully, the King of B.S.: "Who gave the order Rich?"
President Obama, Roanoke Virginia: "They know they didn’t -- look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. . .If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. . . If you’ve got a business -- you didn’t build that."
Based upon what President Obama said in Roanoke a few weeks ago, I'd say that the Navy SEAL Benjamin Smith has a point. President Obama, you didn't get Osama on your own.
If President Bush is still responsible for the economy today, then it seems to me that Presdient Bush should also get all of the credit for getting Osama too.
Sully
7:40 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Interesting choice of words from a conservative website-
http://conservativebyte.com/2012/08/navy-seals-start-swift-boating-obama/
Sully
7:50 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Interview with Admiral William McRaven, the guy in charge of the operation against Bin Laden. Interesting read for those who are interested. I'm guessing Richard won't bother. He's too afraid that the truth may not be as clear as he thinks.
http://archives.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1207/28/sitroom.01.html
Sully
7:55 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Part of the interview-
"The president and his national security team, you know, I'm not a political guy, but I will tell you, as an interested observer in this, they were magnificent in how they handled the start-to-finish.
We went through a number of meetings. The president asked all the right questions. His national security team, with secretary Gates, secretary Clinton, chairman Mullen, the vice chairman, Tom Donilon, Denis McDonough, and John Brennan and others really did a fine job of digging down to find out the facts, to make their recommendations based on the facts, and, of course, the president gave me ample time to prepare once the concept was approved.
But at the end of the day, make no mistake about it, it was the president of the United States that shouldered the burden for this operation that made the hard decisions, that was instrumental in the planning process, because I pitched every plan to him. So any indication that Will McRaven, you know, ordered this raid, led this raid was, you know, the key piece of this raid, is just patently false."
He was probably threatened and had to say that, right Rich?
Nick
8:13 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Romney/Ryan will
Voucher-ize (abolish) Medicare
Privatize (abolish) Social Security
Defund (abolish) Medicaid
Raise taxes on the middle class and poor
Lower taxes on the rich
Protect corporate subsidies
Protect offshore-blind-trust-accounts
Increase the MIC budget
Eliminate the Dept. of Education and the EPA
De-regulate Wall Street and Banks
Eliminate women's rights, equal pay and health care
Repeal Roe v Wade
Repeal the Affordable Health Care Act
Repeal the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
Defund Planned Parenthood
Cut 4.1 million jobs by 2014
And raise the deficit to $16 trillion by 2021
You can guarantee I would never vote for that! You would have to be insane to even consider this as an option!
Richard Schulte
5:27 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
I thought that President Bush did all of those things already. "It's the economy stupid."
Rachel Marks
1:05 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Great, another woman hater to add to the list. I'm thankful Obama gives women respect, unlike the Republican candidates. Against planned parenthood, abortion, birth control, equal pay.... I hate these sadist pigs.
Richard Schulte
5:23 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Rachel Marks: "I hate these sadist pigs."
Can you feel the love?
Richard Schulte
6:08 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
GM, another Obama success story:
"Right now, the federal government owns 500,000,000 shares of GM, or about 26% of the company. It would need to get about $53.00/share for these to break even on the bailout, but the stock closed at only $20.21/share on Tuesday. This left the government holding $10.1 billion worth of stock, and sitting on an unrealized loss of $16.4 billion."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/08/gm_headed_for_bankruptcy_-_again.html#ixzz23tSDKUp7
Richard Schulte
6:21 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
More from the American Thinker:
"For over 70 years, leftists have been preparing to destroy free-enterprise capitalism and establish a statist-controlled Marxist society. Barack Obama has been preparing all of his life to advance that agenda. From his education and indoctrination by his mother and maternal grandparents; the lessons of uncompromising communism from his mentor, Frank Marshal Davis; a 20-year period spent under the guidance of Jeremiah Wright's version of Black Liberation Theology; and close association with unrepentant socialists, Barack Obama became steeped in "afrocentric Marxism," the racially motivated redistribution of wealth from the white power class to the poor black class -- essentially racial reparations disguised as achieving long-denied social justice. His years in college, post-graduate community agitation, and Chicago-style politics in the Illinois senate provided experience in using the levers of politics and government to achieve redistributionist goals."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/the_coming_battle_of_ideologies.html#ixzz23taMVLTc
And know you know what Obama's plans are for his second term-think Cuba.
Nick
8:42 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Enough with that bias new source The Anti-American Stinker!
Yesterday I heard this on the radio, "the Koch Brothers were going to stop giving money to Romney and focus their money on the senate races instead". The only reason they were going to do this, is because they felt Romney's Presidential bid was going down the drain. So Mitten's had no choice but to pick Paul Ryan. Romney must feel like a dog to Koch brothers! If the Koch brothers say sit, Romney will sit. If the Koch brothers tell Romney to get on top of the car, Romney jumps on top of the car. Romney is like a money dog! woof woof. Unfortunately his dog didn't have they same incentives that Mitten's gets! By the way, what's in it for the Koch brothers? What did Romney promised these guys? This is your nominee bought my the billionaires! It's a very sad day for America, when billionaires, the 1%'s are attempting to purchase the highest position in this country!
Richard Schulte
10:14 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
I'm a little puzzled why the left is so obsessed with wealth. Throughout history there have been wealthy people, but it is not the wealthy who have brought so much misery to the human race. In the 20th Century, it was radical leftists, such as Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Kim, Pol Pot and Castro who attempted to exterminate all of their enemies. Based upon the history of the last century, it is radical left, today known as progressives in America, that we need to fear.
Many of the Founding Fathers were wealthy men. These wealthy men risked their fortunes in the American Revolution to create what is known as America. To now say that wealth is somehow evil, seems to be irrational.
The left's constant bashing of the evil Koch Brothers is quite interesting. Why are the Koch Brothers so evil, but a billionaire like George Soros is no problem? The Democrats have had the Kennedys, John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi, all wealthy people. Why is the left not concerned with the Kennedy's, Kerry and Pelosi?
The left obsession with the Koch Brothers seems to be irrational given the fact that they gladly accept the wealthy on their side.
Richard Schulte
9:40 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
"59% View Money-Losing Auto Bailouts As a Failure"
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/auto_industry/april_2012/59_view_money_losing_auto_bailouts_as_a_failure
OMG, another Obama Administration failure. Failure after failure after failure. Sounds like Cuba.
Just Sayin
9:44 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
R&R are dead in the water. Barack will win the election again. Can't wait for that cigar to explode in Schulte and McCloud's faces.
YES WE CAN...make those two eat their own shit !!!
Looking forward to that day boys !!!
Richard Schulte
10:34 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Gallup-registered voters-August 18: Romney 47% / Obama 45%
From Rasmussen (August 16th):
Ohio: Romney 45% / Obama 45%
Wisconsin: Romney 48% / Obama 47%
Iowa: Romney 46% / Obama 44%
Florida: Romney 45% / Obama 43%
Virginia: Obama 48% / Romney 46%
North Carolina: Romney 49% / Obama 44%
Colorado: Romney 47% / Obama 47%
Wisconsin Recall Election-June 6th: Scott Walker retains Governnorship with a greater percentage of the vote than in the original election.
Read 'em and weep. The 2012 election will be a repeat of the 2010 election-Republican landslide.
Dan Arenov
10:38 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
you're delusional, but you aren't smart enough to let that bother you.
Sully
9:56 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Richard, still waiting for you to respond to the admiral's interview (among many other things- you so conveniently ignore anything that questions your assertions). If you are going to say something that is far-fetched, the least you can do is respond to the reply. Assuming of course, you can respond for yourself.
Richard Schulte
10:43 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Your Majesty, I've already responded this morning. Guess you were looking in the mirror this morning saying "Once a fraud, always a fraud." and misssed it. I'll repeat it for you since you're the King of B.S.:
Schulte from earlier this morning:
President Obama, Roanoke Virginia: "They know they didn’t -- look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. . .If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. . . If you’ve got a business -- you didn’t build that."
Based upon what President Obama said in Roanoke a few weeks ago, I'd say that the Navy SEAL Benjamin Smith has a point. President Obama, you didn't get Osama on your own.
If President Bush is still responsible for the economy today, then it seems to me that Presdient Bush should also get all of the credit for getting Osama too.
Sully
11:04 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Sorry Richie, that is not a response to the interview of the admiral. Nice deflection, but still no answer.
Nick
10:17 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
OMG the republicans left this country in such a mess. repair, repair , repair. It's endless! No wonder Newt wanted to start a colony on moon!
Richard Schulte
10:46 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Newt also said that he thought that Nick and His Majesty Sully should be the first colonists on the moon.
Dan Arenov
10:47 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
psssst... hey Nick. (Obama made it worse. time for the adults to take over. you can still catch Obama on t.v. every week, we can be sure of that.. President Kardashian might even get his own reality show on Oprah's network)
Nick
2:54 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Newt also said Richard gets a nice crater.
Nick
10:19 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Richard, another biased news report! rasmyassreport is more like it!
Dan Arenov
10:44 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
at least Rasmussen and Gallup use likely voters vs. 'adults' and they use a sampling that resembles the actual ratio of voters.
NBC put out a poll a couple of weeks ago that had everybody talking about it...it showed that Obama was much more 'likable' than Romney.
turns out that NBC's poll had 40% Democrats and 22% Republicans....which is even MORE of a margin than D's vs. R's in 2008 (39% D vs. 32% R).
Nick, i can tell that despite your silly partisan ranting that you are almost a smart guy, so let me tell you this, in terms that you might appreciate.
This ain't 2008. There is no way that there will be 5% more D's than R's voting in this election, let alone 15 or 20%. Rasmussen is usually closer to the mark than these other guys, whether you like what they say, or not.
Richard Schulte
1:08 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
"Media Matters, Eric Boehlert, tweeted that “former Navy SEALs don’t have guts to admit they’re running a GOP, anti-Obama campaign.” "
Newsmax.com: Navy SEALs PAC Rips Liberal Site for 'Gutless' Comment
But, of course, the Democrats don't have the guts to admit that President Obama is a marxist.
Nick
2:57 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
They should send that seal to Canada for a nice clubbing.
Richard Schulte
4:02 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
No need to send the SEAL to Canada for a clubbing, Obama has played 104 rounds of golf since he's been president-I'm sure he has his own set of clubs. Apparently, Obama has lots of time on his hands if he can play that much golf. Obama could club that SEAL himself (if he's got the guts). Obama wacked Osama all by himself, so he should be able to club a SEAL.
McCloud
3:18 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Has Obama done anything successful in 4 years? We have record unemployment, record foreclosures, credit downgrades, record deficit spending, and there are still folks out there considering him as their vote? Good grief!
Richard Schulte
3:55 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
McCloud: "Has Obama done anything successful in 4 years?"
***
To be honest, yes Obama does have a few successes under his belt these last 3-1/2 years. Obama's golf game has improved immensely and Obama has stopped smoking without gaining weight. That last one is quite an accomplishment.
Sully
3:56 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
So let's see, there was no unemployment, no foreclosures, no deficit spending under Bush. And the credit downgrade had nothing to do with the republicans, only Obama and the democrats. Yep, sounds about right in the Fox universe.
Richard Schulte
4:06 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Nick: "Newt also said Richard gets a nice crater."
Newt was my candidate. Newt did say that Richard gets a nice catering business if he becomes President. Nick just confused "cater" and "crater".
McCloud
5:10 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
I don't have Fox, but when I did I was confident they didn't doctor videos or audios like ABC and NBC. Anyway, is this comment some sort of give up, that Obama is unable to turn things around, because the deficit and unemployment numbers are dwarfed by Obama numbers. By the way, the housing crisis that kicked this thing off was from government programs restricting lenders from underwriting and buying back loans to secure loooser lending policies, Democrat policies.
Richard Schulte
5:29 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
And I don't own a television. I've only seen Fox News once in my life-watched for about 25 minutes. From what I've heard about Fox, I don't think it is conservative, although conservatives appear on Fox. I don't think Bill O'Reilly is a conservative, although a column written by O'Reilly appears on the Townhall website on Saturdays. I think I've read O'Reilly's column once or twice.
You people on the left just need something to poke at and Fox is a convenient target for your wrath. I don't think you understand what being a conservative is all about.
And King Sully (the King of B.S.), there is no doubt that you're a marxist. I'm proud to call myself a conservative. King Sully just doesn't want to admit that's he's a marxist. Fidel denied he was a Communist, until he took over Cuba and then Fidel said guess what? I lied about that communist thing. So go ahead and lie about you being a marxist King Sully, you're not fooling anybody with your denial. "Social Justice" is just re-packaged marxism.
Sully
6:01 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Children. That's what you are. You cannot have a rational conversation based on factual information; you resort to name-calling and accusations. You don't question anything you hear from the righting, whether it be Fox, Limbaugh, Malkin, Coulter, or anyone else who profits from hate mongering. If you could think for yourself, you would have to notice that 100 percent of what these people say is pro-right wing/negative left. Do you really believe that every republican is infallible, always truthful, always patriotic, while every democrat is just the opposite? That's ridiculous. You guys have all this hatred for probably half of the U.S. population. That's a lot of hate fellas. You base every belief on this hatred and you have no idea what the real world is like. You think you're the mainstream? That everyone hates as much as you do? I hate to break it to you, guys, but you are the minority. Richard, it makes no difference if you are as intelligent as you think you are. Since you don't use your brain, it doesn't matter. You don't think. You emote.
it's a shame that most real religious people think helping the less fortunate is a virtue, while you and the false religions inspired by the Pat Robertsons and Jerry Falwells, as well as the dominionists and fundamentalists, treat religion as a way to conquer. Sure am glad I belong to the first group.
Richard Schulte
5:27 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Sully (The King of B.S.): "Children. That's what you are. You cannot have a rational conversation based on factual information; you resort to name-calling and accusations. You don't question anything you hear from the righting, whether it be Fox, Limbaugh, Malkin, Coulter, or anyone else who profits from hate mongering. If you could think for yourself, you would have to notice that 100 percent of what these people say is pro-right wing/negative left. Do you really believe that every republican is infallible, always truthful, always patriotic, while every democrat is just the opposite? That's ridiculous. You guys have all this hatred for probably half of the U.S. population. That's a lot of hate fellas. You base every belief on this hatred and you have no idea what the real world is like. You think you're the mainstream? That everyone hates as much as you do? I hate to break it to you, guys, but you are the minority. . .You don't think. You emote."
The ravings of a mad man.
Sully is always right and anybody who disagrees with him is always wrong. Now that we have that understood, let's have a rational conversation. To Sully, a rational conversation is you listen to him and then agree with him.
Sully defines any idea with which he disagrees with as "hate". That sounds irrational to me. Why would anyone want to converse with someone who is irrational?
Sully decries name-calling, then he name-calls. Sounds irrational and delusional to me.
Dan Arenov
9:58 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Sully is a master at the art of projection.
Terri
6:15 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Mccloud: Get a clue. http://mediamatters.org/research/2009/11/11/hannity-video-switch-up-is-only-the-tip-of-fox/156851, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhZ9jE7Ztt4, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS1NWYV1i_E, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FwvQYLKK98, http://mediamatters.org/research/2009/11/19/fox-news-year-in-apologies-fake-videos-false-in/157273...the list goes on...
And as for you not watching Fox, I call bullsh*t. Or is the sociopath, Rush, all you need to get your misinformation? You "confident" that he doesn't spew mythological info. to his hate-monger audience?
Richard Schulte
7:20 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Terri, you just made my day. I love it when the left-wing radical kooks go off. The mere mention of Rush Limbaugh sends them into orbit. Yes, I've been listening to Rush's radio show since mid-October 1994, almost 18 years now.
My brother asked me to listen to Rush for a week. The first day I listened, I said to myself, this Rush guy is an ass. The second day I listened, I said to myself this Rush guy is an ass, but he's right. The third day I listened to Rush, I said to myself, Rush isn't an ass, he's just right. You guessed it, Rush is right-the big voice on the right.
I also listen to Mark Levin and Laura Ingrahm. When I lived in Chicago, I also listened to Bruce Wolf and Dan Proft on WLS. (In fact, I was a guest on Bruce/Dan's show a few days before Christmas in 2010. That didn't go so good-Bruce kept talking and wouldn't let me get a word in.) I read and adore both Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin. Sarah Palin was my pick for the Republican presidential candidate. And I think that Michele Bachmann is wonderful too.
And now to make your evening, just let me say that man-made global warming is a hoax and that Obama is a marxist-there is no difference between Obama and Castro, except the beard and the military uniform. Have a pleasant evening you kook.
Richard Schulte
7:22 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
I'm sorry, I forgot this Terri: Thumbs up TEA party.
Richard Schulte
5:44 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, Dick Cheney, Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Michelle Malkin, and the list goes on of dastardly characters the left villifies. Why does the left "hate" these people? Very simple-the left needs villans to focus their wrath on.
Rush et al expose the lies of the left. Anybody who exposes the left for who they really are is an enemy that must be destroyed.
President Clinton decried the "politics of personal destruction" and then raised the "politics of personal destruction" to an art-form. Jennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky and Paula Jones all had to be destroyed because they told the truth about Clinton.
Sully decries name-calling and then not two sentences later Sully name-calls.
If you read Sully's posts on Patch you see how vile and vicious that this person actually is, but he won't reveal his name. Sully believes he's omnipotent and that his arguments are persuasive. While Sully arguments might be persuasive to young adults, adults with more life experience know that Sully is just the King of B.S.
And when Sully can't persuade experienced adults with his b.s., he gets angry and goes into a tirade. My guess is that Sully at one time in his life was a college professor. He treats everyone on Patch as if they are his students and can't deal with people who are his intellectual equals or who are intellectually superior.
Welcome to the real world Professor Sully. You're positively 4th Street.
McCloud
6:11 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
I love the presumptive stereotypes these tolerant liberals display with their empty rhetoric. false religions inspired by the Pat Robertsons and Jerry Falwells - I don't even know what religion these guys preach for, yet somehow claiming their belief as false rings intolerance. Are they still alive? You don't question anything you hear from the righting, whether it be Fox, Limbaugh, Malkin, Coulter, or anyone else who profits from hate mongering. - I don't need to listen, since I can read numbers showing record unemployment, credit downgrade, record foreclosures and record debt. Are these numbers they refer to somehow lies? Do you really believe that every republican is infallible, always truthful, always patriotic, while every democrat is just the opposite? - Did I ever mention this? I can name quite a few that falls into the later, Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Durbin, even Bush caved in on Tarp.
Richard Schulte
6:26 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Everybody knows who is responsible for this miserable economy-Obama is a "miserable failure.
"The defiance against Obama grows. At one stop his caterer hired by the Obama campaign showed up in a t-shirt saying he did build his business, at another in Virginia, a bakery (Crumb and Get It) refused to serve Biden and ended up with so much new business there were lines around the block until he ran out of food to sell."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/the_defiant_ones.html#ixzz23zSS7WrI
The economy me will soar once Obama is defeated at the polls. The recession ends on the evening of November 6. God bless America.
Obama-Worst.President.Ever.
Richard Schulte
6:39 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
"Recently I wrote about mysterious purchases of hollow-point ammo going to the National Weather Service which turned out to be a clerical error but doesn't explain government purchases of over 2 billion rounds of hollow-point ammo."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/08/administration_seeks_to_explain_ammo_purchases.html#ixzz23zUbDNp4
Yes, that's right, the Federal Government is purchasing 2 billion rounds of ammunition. What for? And it's not just any ammunition, it's hollow-point ammo. Why are Federal law enforcement agenices using hollow-point ammunition?
Just exactly what is the Federal Government preparing for? 2 billion rounds of ammunition. That enough to put 6 bullets in every American citizen. You have to wonder if the November elections will be cancelled because Obama already knows the results. Now that sounds like crazy talk, but what other explanation is there?
There is no doubt that Obama is a marxist. 2 billion rounds of hollow-point ammo. Put marxist together with 2 billion rounds of ammo together and you know what that means. Think the Cuban revolution. Forward.
Fred 'n Freeda
9:21 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Here's the Romney-Ryan Plan:
1. Tax poor & working people but not the rich;
2. Encourage wages in the U.S. to fall to third world levels;
3. Pass trade laws that make it easy for companies to send jobs overseas;
4. Pass laws that enable only insurance companies to control who gets health care (including seniors) and who doesn't;
5. Replace public education with out of pocket private schools and home schooling;
6. Refuse to invest in crumbling public infrastructure such as highways, bridges, and sewer systems;
7. Environmental Policy: Pass laws and weaken regulations that enable companies to pollute the environment;
8. Pass laws that enable gas and oil production and prices to be controlled by a few large companies; Make sure that there is no longer any research or work on alternative energy sources; Keep defense spending high to protect non domestic oil production;
9. Repress rights for women and minorities and repress voting participation;
10. Divide the American people on cultural issues (religion, sexual orientation, gun rights, etc);
11. Instill fear in the American public through manufactured crises and created "boogeymen". Then attack political opponents by claiming to be more "patriotic" and the better keeper of "American Values" than they.
12. Make it impossible for literally millions of ELIGIBLE voters to cast their ballots, which is flagrant vote tampering and corruption.
Can YOU afford to vote for these guys? I can't. I'M A WORKING MOTHER.
Dan Arenov
9:54 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Wow. i sure hope you guys do some serious reading about the actual plans of this future administration before November.
Do yourself a favor and read some articles from RealClearPolitics.com between now and election day.
Pick a subject where one of the writers writes a 'pro-Obama' article about a subject and then read one from a 'pro-Romney' standpoint. Do this early and often.
It's apparent from your post that you are only getting your information from one set of propagandists... if you are a WORKING MOTHER, as you say here, you probably know that the truth oftentimes lays somewhere in the middle.
Richard Schulte
9:55 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
"Can YOU afford to vote for these guys? I can't. I'M A WORKING MOTHER." "
I'm an under-employed engineer with 35 years of experience. I lost my home in Evanston after living there for 17 years. I was homeless for 3 months. The last 3-1/2 years have been hell. My son is 25 years old with 4 years of college under his belt. He's unemployed. This is what Obama has brought to this America. Can we afford not to vote for Romney/Ryan?
Since you're working, how about if I come on over to your house for a few meals. You wouldn't mind if I sleep on the floor in your living room would you? I'll do my own laundry in your washing machine.
Obama is a failure. Why would you want to vote for failed policies? Given us your address so that we can come on over to your home and mooch if Obama is re-elected. Yes, it's that bad.
I assume that you voted for Obama in 2008. This is all your fault. Yes, I'm blaming you and the rest of the fools who voted for someone who had absolutely no experience to be president other than being a community organizer. What in the hell does a community organizer do?
Dr. John
10:46 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Hey,
What do you know. This is a liberal troll poster. This same comment was posted 18 times in at least 8 states. Please take the Soro's money you are earning to post your robo-comments and buy all of the medication your doctor reccomends. When you skip doses or medications it seems you enter an alternate reality world. Just my advice.
Richard Schulte
10:08 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Terri: "You "confident" that he [Rush Limbaugh] doesn't spew mythological info. to his hate-monger audience?"
From Terri's comment above, I get the impression that Terri has never listened to the Rush Limbaugh show. If she would listen, you would find something very different going on the show.
What Terri is spouting is the typical radical left-wing propaganda. We listen to Rush Limbaugh not because we agree with Rush, but because Rush agrees with us. Rush just says what we were already were thinking.
Perhaps it's time for Terri to listen to what Rush has got to say. You might also want to take a look at what Dr. Walter Williams and Dr. Thomas Sowell have got to say. I'd say that Rush's opinion are pretty mainstream opinions in America.
And yes Terri, most Americans do not believe that man-made global warming is occurring. You folks who think cars are causing global warming are in the minority. You just think you're in the majority because you folks all scream so loud.
Terri
11:49 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
you know what they say..."sociopaths love company." Yes, have listened to Rush and his hatred, greed and lies make my stomach turn. Fortunately, I'm not susceptible to brainwashing that appeals to the lowest level of human instinct. Fear.
Dan Arenov
12:04 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
how true, Terri. the pigressives love to use fear as a tactic to scare their voting base:
"they want to cut medicare and kill grandma"!
"...they wanna put y'all back in chains"!
Dan Arenov
12:05 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Terri, i forgot to mention that the comments i post here aren't from liberal pundits, who are much more prone to hyperbole. These are from our elected officials, disgusting as that may seem.
Richard Schulte
12:23 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Some quotes from the (evil) Rush Limbaugh's radio show on August 13th, 2012:
RUSH: "If Medicare's the most important thing in your life, and you're over 55, Paul Ryan lets you keep it as it is forever. That's it. Nothing happens to you. Zip, zero, nada. If Obama and Obamacare are fully implemented, you are up the creek, because hello death panels, hello cutbacks, hello all kinds of changes, hello bankruptcy."
RUSH: I'm desperate for people like you to learn the truth... The subprime mortgage crisis is the foundation of the economic collapse, and it was brought to us by the Democrat Party.
RUSH: Ryan said, "My mom is a Medicare senior in Florida. Our point is, we need to preserve their benefits because government made promises to them that they've organized their retirements around. Now, in order to make sure we can do that, you must reform it for those of us who are younger, and we think these reforms are good reforms. They have bipartisan origins. They started from the Clinton commission in the late nineties."
Want more: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily
Hell, Sully sounds 10 times more vile, vicious and obnoxious than the quotes above.
I guess anyone whose view of the world differs from Terri's view is just a socio-path.
I'm sorry, but I don't see anything vile, vicious or extreme in what Rush has said above. Does Rush make fun of Democrats-sure he does. Democrats are hillarious
Conrad
1:10 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Patch Editor,
How much longer are you going to allow Mr. Schulte to antagonize, provoke, and insult your readers? Clearly I don't have to read his posts, but he takes over every story that has political or economic implications. His over the top comments are condescending and offensive to most adult readers. If there is a policy for posting comments, please have him follow it.
Thank you
Richard Schulte
1:39 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Conrad: "How much longer are you going to allow Mr. Schulte to antagonize, provoke, and insult your readers?"
Once again, we have a Democrat who is trying to shut down political debate. To quote Hillary Clinton, "We are Americans and we have a right to debate."
I'd be curious what I have said that is antagonistic, provoking or insulting. If you woud like to read posts that are antagonistic, provoking and insulting read Sully's comments:
http://evanston.patch.com/users/sully-6/comments
It's interesting that folks like Conrad have no objection to what Sully has to say. I'm just playing by the rules Sully uses. I'm assuming that since I'm exposing the left that they are upset. Oh well, tell the truth and you won't have that problem.
Richard Schulte
1:44 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Conrad, here is an excerpt from a post from Sully yesterday (Saturday) evening at 6:01 pm:
Sully: "Children. That's what you are. You cannot have a rational conversation based on factual information; you resort to name-calling and accusations. You don't question anything you hear from the right[w]ing, whether it be Fox, Limbaugh, Malkin, Coulter, or anyone else who profits from hate mongering. If you could think for yourself, you would have to notice that 100 percent of what these people say is pro-right wing/negative left. Do you really believe that every republican is infallible, always truthful, always patriotic, while every democrat is just the opposite? That's ridiculous. You guys have all this hatred for probably half of the U.S. population. That's a lot of hate fellas. You base every belief on this hatred and you have no idea what the real world is like. You think you're the mainstream? That everyone hates as much as you do? I hate to break it to you, guys, but you are the minority. Richard, it makes no difference if you are as intelligent as you think you are. Since you don't use your brain, it doesn't matter. You don't think. You emote."
No objection from you about this post. I wonder why? Oh yeah, you agree with it-so it's OK.
Look at all the talk about "hate". Can't get much more vile and obnoxious than that can you? I'd say that Conrad is nothing but a hypocrite.
Abigail
1:48 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Typical Dems, aren't they Richard Schulte?! Like you said, they try to shut down any debate where a conservative speaks. All they want to hear is their own BS and forbid those of us who disagree with them to say anything.
Conrad
2:32 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
I am not a Democrat. I am an adult who tires of hyperbole. I am a Republican who is sick of what the extremists have done to my party.
Mr. Schulte, your attitude and the attitude of those like you have done much to ruin this country. Moderate republicans and moderate democrats working together made this country great. The extremists who have taken over my party have left the true republican brand in shambles. Reagan, GHW Bush, and George W. Bush were not perfect, nor was Clinton, nor is Obama. No president of either party can move the country in the right direction if congress obstructs his every move. Moderates recognized this. Extremists such as the Tea Party, do not. Nothing will improve with the acrimony between the two parties. If Mr. Limbaugh were truly a patriot, he would stop this crusade against Democrats that accomplishes nothing and help politicians in both parties move this country in the right direction.
NotWastingTime
2:16 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Richard Schulte: "I'm an under-employed engineer with 35 years of experience. I lost my home in Evanston after living there for 17 years. I was homeless for 3 months. The last 3-1/2 years have been hell. My son is 25 years old with 4 years of college under his belt."
Maybe if you spent half as much time looking for a job instead posting on The Patch you'd have a better job. My 23 year old son, with a 4 year degree, has a full time job in law enforcement. Don't blame others for you failings. If your life "has been hell" for the past 3 1/2 years then blame Bush. It would have been as a result of his policies not Obama's
Richard Schulte
2:49 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
NotWastingTime: "Maybe if you spent half as much time looking for a job instead posting on The Patch you'd have a better job."
Hmmm, I've been self-employed for 24 years. Didn't have a problem with getting work in the construction industry for the first 20 years. The problem started one week before the election of 2008. Coincidence-I think not.
The President of the firm that I work for (that would be Richard Schulte) has determined that the most productive use of my time would be to work on getting Obama and as many Democrats defeated in the 2012 election. That would be best for the future of my firm, as well as the future of my son and every other American.
If Obama is defeated in the election, then the recession ends on November 6th, 2012. If Obama is re-elected, the recession will continue for another 4 years. If Obama is re-elected, I plan on closing down my firm on November 7th because there will be no hope for the private sector construction industry for the next 4 years.
Now I have some advice for you: Never, never take advice from a liberal. You can quote me on that.
Sully
3:05 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
You must really be proud of that response, Rich. It's the second time you've used it, word for word. Bush was still in office one week before the election, and the outcome of the election one week beforehand was not a positive. So how was it Obama's fault if he wasn't president yet? Since you weren't able to answer my question regarding the number of foreclosures and housing starts under Bush, especially his last two years, I'll assume you didn't look at the stats. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. I'll show them to you again - from 2005 to 2007, home foreclosures went up 102 percent, while new home starts went down 35 percent. Doesn't seem like business was thriving too much then. What do you think?
People Person
2:20 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
The Romney-Ryan Plan:
1. Tax poor & working people but not the rich;
2. Encourage wages in the U.S. to fall to third world levels;
3. Pass trade laws that make it easy for companies to send jobs overseas;
4. Pass laws that enable only insurance companies to control who gets health care (including seniors) and who doesn't;
5. Replace public education with out of pocket private schools and home schooling;
6. Refuse to invest in crumbling public infrastructure such as highways, bridges, and sewer systems;
7. Pass laws that weaken regulations and enable companies to pollute the environment;
8. Pass laws that enable gas and oil production and prices to be controlled by a few large companies; Make sure that there is no longer any research or work on alternative energy sources; Keep defense spending high to protect non domestic oil production;
9. Repress rights for women and minorities and repress voting participation;
10. Divide the American people on cultural issues (religion, sexual orientation, gun rights, etc);
11. Instill fear in the American public through manufactured crises and created "boogeymen". Then attack political opponents by claiming to be more "patriotic" and the better keeper of "American Values" than they.
12. Make it impossible for literally millions of ELIGIBLE voters to cast their ballots, which is flagrant vote tampering and corruption.
Can YOU afford to support these guys? We can't. We're an average American working family.
McCloud
2:29 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Can you afford these guys? Why not ask the 20 million unemployed, or the 25 million who foreclosed on their homes, or you children's grand children who will foot the bill for Obama's stimulus fiasco.
Richard Schulte
3:16 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Conrad: "I am not a Democrat. I am an adult who tires of hyperbole. I am a Republican who is sick of what the extremists have done to my party.
Mr. Schulte, your attitude and the attitude of those like you have done much to ruin this country. Moderate republicans and moderate democrats working together made this country great. The extremists who have taken over my party have left the true republican brand in shambles. Reagan, GHW Bush, and George W. Bush were not perfect, nor was Clinton, nor is Obama. No president of either party can move the country in the right direction if congress obstructs his every move. Moderates recognized this. Extremists such as the Tea Party, do not. Nothing will improve with the acrimony between the two parties. If Mr. Limbaugh were truly a patriot, he would stop this crusade against Democrats that accomplishes nothing and help politicians in both parties move this country in the right direction."
Conrad, first let me say that I am not a Republican and neither is Rush Limbaugh. I have never voted in a Republican primary and have never contributed to the Republican Party or a Republican candidate over the last 40 years.
Based upon what you have written above, I really doubt that you are a Republican. If you are a Republican, I'm the King of England. But let's assume for just a moment that you are a moderate Republican. In my opinion that makes you a bigger problem thant the Democrats. Moderate Republicans are just Democrat-lites.
Richard Schulte
3:30 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
I consider myself a small government conservative similar to Ronald Reagan. In 2008, I chose to stay home rather than vote for John McCain. I despise John McCain. If I had voted, I would have voted for the Palin part of the McCain/Palin ticket.
Both George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush were big government conservatives. Sorry, but there really isn't a whole lot of difference between big government conservatives and the Democrats.
My preferred candidate in 2012 was Sarah Palin. Since Palin did not run, I was in the Newt Gingrich camp, but Michele Bachmann would have been fine with me too. Until last week, I was ho-hum about Mitt Romney. I am much more enthused with Paul Ryan on the ticket. It appears that Romney is doing what a CEO does and I'm encouraged.
Lastly, I don't give a damn about your opinion. It was the TEA party that carried Governor Scott Walker over the finish line in the recall election. If Romney wins, it will be because of the TEA party. I really don't give a damn about the Republican Party-you are the guys who screwed it up by nominating John McCain. The Republican Party is just as responsible for what's going on now in the economy because the Republicans let Obama win the election. Obama was a light-weight in 2008. Hillary Clinton would have been the more formidable candidate for the Democrats.
I haven't voted for a Democrate since 1976, but that doesn't mean that I always vote Republican. Hopefully, the TEA party is victorious.
Conrad
3:46 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Ronald Reagan would be ashamed to have you compare yourself to him, as would any civil minded conservative. Neither Mrs. Palin nor Mrs. Bachmann will ever be considered serious candidates because they will drive away every independent voter.
NotWastingTime
3:22 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
"The President of the firm that I work for (that would be Richard Schulte) has determined that the most productive use of my time would be to work on getting Obama and as many Democrats defeated in the 2012 election."
If any of my employees did that I'd fire the SOB. Instead of putting "into" the business by trying to find new clients and business or creatively expanding into other area's you're playing "blame the president". Yeah, you deserved to fail.
And "the most productive use of my time would be to work on getting Obama and as many Democrats defeated in the 2012 election." You sound like Mitch McConnell. Who famously stated: "The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, quoted in National Journal, November 4, 2010
Jeez, you'd thing the single most important thing the Senate Majority Leader and the other obstructionists in congress would do is help put this country back to work.
Richard Schulte
3:50 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
NotWasting Time: "If any of my employees did that I'd fire the SOB. Instead of putting "into" the business by trying to find new clients and business or creatively expanding into other area's you're playing "blame the president". Yeah, you deserved to fail."
Well, I am the top dog in my company and the only dog in my company too. Sorry, I can't be fired. I put my country before myself. The best thing for both my country and for me and my son (and every other American) is to make sure Obama is defeated.
GM went bankrupt. Chrysler was on its way to insolvency too. American Airlines just declared bankruptcy. My company is still in business and hasn't declared bankruptcy. Guess I'm doing better than GM, Chrysler, American Airlines and I didn't get a bail-out.
Look around and see all of the vacant tenant spaces at shopping centers. Look around-there are very few new buildings (almost none) being constructed. The only real work in the construction industry is in Washington DC, Texas and North Dakota. That's the way it is and their is absolutely nothing I can do about it (except working to get rid of Obama).
Let me repeat my advice to you and everybody else: Never take advice from a liberal.
One other thing to say: Obama is a marxist. Obama: Worst.President.Ever.
Oh, and Conrad the moderate Republican (RINO), the TEA party is working to take over the Republican Party and we don't want anything to do with you. Thumbs up Sarah and Michele.
Sully
3:24 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Conrad, for you-
http://www.peninsulaweekly.com.au/news/world/world/general/radicals-push-members-out-on-a-wing/2624001.aspx?storypage=0
Banachek
3:30 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
To help put this country back to work, the first thing is to defeat Obama. Nothing he has done in 4 years, two with super majorities in both houses, has worked, but caused more debt and pain for the middle class,
Banachek
3:48 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
I love it when these liberal d-bags get their lunch handed to them.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/08/19/tea-partier-ted-cruz-schools-ej-dionne-obamas-serious-budget-it-got-z
Richard Schulte
3:55 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Sully: "Doesn't seem like business was thriving too much then. What do you think?"
I agree. There has been a problem with the economy since September 11th-almost 11 years now.
Sully, if you think that I think that Bush was just grand, you're mistaken. I have no love for the Republican Party either. When the House was run by Newt, things were fine. But Speaker Dennny Hastert was a disaster.
Nick
7:12 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
"Sully, if you think that I think that Bush was just grand, you're mistaken. I have no love for the Republican Party either."
Really Richard? For some reason I don't believe in you! Kind of like the republican picking up toilet paper up from the stall next to him. No one believed him either!
NotWastingTime
3:59 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
"Nothing he has done in 4 years, two with super majorities in both houses, has worked"...really?
We didn't go from a NEGATIVE 800K jobs lost per month under Bush to a positive monthly job growth? I must be dreaming...
Richard Schulte
4:03 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Conrad: "Ronald Reagan would be ashamed to have you compare yourself to him, as would any civil minded conservative."
Conrad, I have much more respect for Sully than I do for you. At least Sully is an honest liar. Sully and I are on opposite teams and there is no doubt about that. I'm not sure what team you play for, but I do know it's moderates who caused all the problems. The TEA party is playing to win. Moderate wait until they figure out which way the wind is blowing, then make a decision. To quote Sarah Palin, moderates have no cajones. At least Sully has cajones.
Sully
4:53 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Don't get me involved. As far as I'm concerned, Conrad is absolutely right. I respect rational republicans- not the extremists he was referring to. The tea party's refusal to work with anyone who doesn't agree with them is what will destroy this country. It's their rigid, narrow -minded, holier than thou attitude that is the problem. It's not the politicians who are willing to work together for everyone in this country, and not just a select few. If I wanted to live in a fundamentalist theocracy, I'd move to Saudi Arabia.
NotWastingTime
4:09 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
"Well, I am the top dog in my company and the only dog in my company"
Woof Woof!
Time to put a muzzle on it Richie
McCloud
4:23 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Was that 800K before or after the U2 unemployment number eliminated 3 million jobs since Obama started. If you lack the economic cred just take a look around, strip malls are growing prickly weeds.
Sully
5:07 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
It looks like Ryan has some of the same problems with chronological order as you guys do-
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/paul-ryan-slams-obama-for-not-saving-auto-plant----in-2008.php?ref=fpb
Sully
5:09 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
He has some trouble with the truth as well-
http://news.yahoo.com/presented-letters-ryan-admits-requesting-stimulus-cash-234025910--abc-news-politics.html
McCloud
5:45 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
The politicians who "worked together" have created a massive debt problem, thats what working together does. The Tea Party told you that without cutting the spending our credit rating would be downgraded, people line M Bachmann. Instead, after they are proved correct, we get cute Bachmann mockings and racial accusations. Good grief.
Richard Schulte
6:10 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Moderate Republicans are the reason why the Democrats controlled the House of Representatives from 1955-1995-40 years. It was Newt Gingrich and conservatives like Dick Armey that seized control of the House in the 1994 elections.
It was the TEA party that won the 2010 elections and put the Repubblicans back in charge of the House in 2011. It will be the TEA party that will put Romney in the White House. Without the TEA party and the energy that the TEA party brings to the Republican Party, the Republican Party is dead.
Of course, Sully like moderate Republicans-they have no backbone and will just cave to the Democrats. Moderate Republicans are the Democrats' best friend.
Moderate Republicans in Illinois are why the Democrats control Illinois and Chicago. Illinois Republicans are just steers-no cajones.
McCloud is correct, moderate Republicans together with the Democrats created the economic mess we have now.
Recall that it was President Richard Nixon (R) who created the EPA monster by Executive Order.
Sully
6:36 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Sorry Mac, but the tea party is basically responsible for the downgrade. Try looking up the facts instead of taking a right wing shill's version.
Sully
6:33 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Gee Rich, then I guess the only solution in your mind would be constant civil war because i assure you, the country as a whole will not support tea party policies. Depending on who's going to pay for the tea party, it should pretty much be a massacre. The sane would prevail and Palin could then cry about the lame stream media and how she's such a victim. Of course, she'd have to get paid first. The religious right can blame Satan and say America is the new Sadom and Gomorrah, and Rick Perry can threaten succession (go for it Rick!). So much for the UNITED STATES of America. But isn't that what the tea party would prefer? If its not their way, it can't be anyway, so let's just destroy this country as we know it.
McCloud
7:19 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Just for giggles, how is the Tea Party responsible? Oh, it had nothing to do with prodigious spending, like a foreclosure has nothing to do with not making mortgage payments. I know better than ask the spin doctor code pink guy.
Nick
7:31 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Get real McCloud! Most of the tea-party people are just republicans with extreme views. These people still vote republican when election time come. Personally, I still haven't met one Democrat that has become a tea party member.
McCloud
8:22 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
My idea of extreme is a 1% GDP for 4 years, and an unemployment rate that would be double digits if not for the extremists who decided eliminating 3 million jobs from the equation would make the number more palitable. Extreme is when your credit rating gets downgraded for the first time in history, or extreme is when you spend more than all other Presidents in history combined, extreme is what you have in the white house, except you just are slow to catch on.
Nick
8:39 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Once again Obama was handed the worst economy possible in the history of the America. If Obama did nothing, we would of been in a long depression and then you would complained that he did nothing at all. Keep dreaming and believing your false reality! These policies were republican driven and they took us off the cliff!
Just Sayin
11:09 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Nick your comment is110% correct.
McCloud and Schulte spew forth their twisted and perverse realities like it will have meaning for anyone other than their own pathetic selves. They'd be sad if they weren't so laughable.
Sully
8:55 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/spratingreport_080611.pdf
This, McCloud, is a copy of the report from S&P's. I realize it says Washington Post, but what it is is a copy of the report.
Sully
9:00 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
I'll even post just some of the comments in case the report is too long to read.
"We lowered our long-term rating on the U.S. because we believe that the
prolonged controversy over raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related
fiscal policy debate indicate that further near-term progress containing the
growth in public spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an
agreement on raising revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and
will remain a contentious and fitful process. We also believe that the fiscal
consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration agreed to this week
falls short of the amount that we believe is necessary to stabilize the
general government debt burden by the middle of the decade."
"the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic challenges...
• ...we have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any time soon."
Sully
9:01 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
"The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as
America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective,
and less predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt
ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in
the debate over fiscal policy. Despite this year's wide-ranging debate, in our
view, the differences between political parties have proven to be
extraordinarily difficult to bridge, and, as we see it, the resulting
agreement fell well short of the comprehensive fiscal consolidation program
that some proponents had envisaged until quite recently. Republicans and
Democrats have only been able to agree to relatively modest savings on
discretionary spending while delegating to the Select Committee decisions on
more comprehensive measures. It appears that for now, new revenues have
dropped down on the menu of policy options. In addition, the plan envisions
only minor policy changes on Medicare and little change in other entitlements,
the containment of which we and most other independent observers regard as key
to long-term fiscal sustainability"
Sully
9:03 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
"Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now
assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012,
remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority
of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise
revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the act.
Sully
9:08 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
So McCloud, how about giving a little credit where credit is due. Tha antagonism between the two parties and the uncertainty that resulted was the primary cause of the downgrade, not the overall spending. Here, read this again-
"We have changed our assumption on this because the majority
of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise
revenues..."
Nick
1:32 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
The republican's war on women goes on! Rep. Todd Akin's (R-Mo.) comment on Sunday, " that "legitimate rape" victims rarely get pregnant and therefore do not need abortions",
Who in the hell needs any republican to fix this country! This is just one byproduct of their repair job they plan to do. What's next with these bozo's? Vote Democrat if you believe freedom for everyone and not the selected few! People wise up, this recovery may be slow, but it will solid in the long run.. Once we lose welfare, social security , medicare, medicaid, it will be impossible to get back! These far righties need to be stopped now, before its too late!
Richard Schulte
6:32 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Nick, it would appear that the American people don't think that the economy is improving.
"A recent Rasmussen survey found that only 27% believe that the economy is improving."
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/the_government_is_bankrupt_and_will_destroy_the_economy.html#ixzz245KdVE1b
Richard Schulte
6:09 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Nick: "People wise up, this recovery may be slow, but it will solid in the long run."
Nick is correct. The unemployment rate roses in 44 states last month. GDP is at a standstill. We are headed into another recession. Hey, wait a minute, that doesn't sound like a recovery to me. Sounds like the economy is getting worse. Yes, the economy is going downhill once again.
"Are you better off today than you were 4 years ago?"
"It's the economy stupid."
Richard Schulte
6:17 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Nick: "Once we lose welfare, social security , medicare, medicaid, it will be impossible to get back!"
The US Government is bankrupt. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will be out of money in a few years. If these programs are not modified, nobody will get anything-that's right your Social Security checks will stop coming.
So which plan is better? The Repubican plan to save these programs or the Democrat plan to let Socials Security, Medicare and Medicaid go bankrupt and end in a "train-wreck"? It sounds to me like the Democrat "train wreck" ending for these programs is the extreme position.
You get to decide on November 6th what kind of country you want to live in. Choose wisely. And if you have any doubts, look what is happening in Greece and Spain. If Obama is re-elected, that's where we headed-just like Greece and Spain.
Richard Schulte
6:28 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Just a little on the Public Debt:
"The official federal debt is $16 trillion. This debt represents 100% of current GDP. Ken Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart studied countries with high levels of government debt. This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly contains their complete findings. The authors concluded:
In our study "Growth in a Time of Debt," we found relatively little association between public liabilities and growth for debt levels of less than 90 percent of GDP. But burdens above 90 percent are associated with 1 percent lower median growth. Our results are based on a data set of public debt covering 44 countries for up to 200 years. The annual data set incorporates more than 3,700 observations spanning a wide range of political and historical circumstances, legal structures and monetary regimes."
Since Sully keeps referring back to the Bush Administration, under President Bush's Administration, the public debt was far below 90 percent of GDP. Once the Democrats took control of the House in 2007, spending accelerated until where we are now-the public debt at 100 percent of GDP.
You can't blame President Bush for this. The spending riot occurred under President Obama and Speaker Nancy Pelosi's stewardship.
America is in big trouble, unless you view the bankruptcy of the American government as a good thing. (See Greece and Spain if you want to know what happens when a country goes bankrupt.)
Richard Schulte
6:52 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
If you thought the above was bad news, you ain't heard nothing yet:
"The total obligation of the federal government to voters that is not funded at the present time is now $222 trillion. This does not mean that, over the entire life of the program, the government will be short $220 trillion. It means that the present value of the unfunded liability is $220 trillion. This means that the government would have to set aside $220 trillion immediately, invest this money in non-government projects that will pay a positive rate of return, and will therefore fund the amortization of this debt. I have written about the estimate here."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/the_government_is_bankrupt_and_will_destroy_the_economy.html#ixzz245Ok2FfM
I'd say we've got a spending problem. Raising taxes on the wealthy ain't going to help. The Democrats, with the help of moderate Republicans, have killed "the goose that lays the golden eggs".
Are you listening Conrad? It's people like you who have facilitated the Democrats in the bankrupting of America. Thanks Conrad-no cajones and no backbone.
Sully
9:20 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Hey Rich, are you ever going to stop blaming everyone else for your failures? No, I guess not. How do you support yourself when you sit on the computer all day complaining?
Richard Schulte
9:33 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Sully: "Hey Rich, are you ever going to stop blaming everyone else for your failures?"
What failures are you talking about Sully? There are no failures. My business is still open and my small business has been operating for 24 years-no bail-outs. I'm at the top of my game. My name is recognized everywhere in my field.
GM went belly-up and had to be bailed out. American Airlines just declared bankruptcy. Schulte & Associates has not declared bankruptcy, nor has the firm been bailed out by the Government. Compared to GM and AA, Schulte & Associates is doing great.
I'm quite optimistic about the future. The recession ends on the evening of November 6th and the stock market will go through the roof on November 7th, if the rally hasn't already started before then. It will be another landslide victory for the Republicans thanks to the TEA party and President Romney will begin working his magic on the economy.
Like Sully, Obama is a fraud. Romney is the real thing.
McCloud
8:42 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
You must be high on MSLSD to think the credit downgrade had nothing to do with massive spending, and is all about Republican bickering and stubborness. You may want to go cold turkey on that channel, as your reality and critical thinking skills are void. Republicans caved in to Democrats, and Democrat threats of credit downgrade without ceiling passage were realized anyway. I watched Rachel Madcow squirm when the story broke, an extra dose of LSD was necessary to push this one under the table.
Sully
9:06 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
You really aren't very bright are you? I don't watch television news or Maddow. The facts are right there in the report. It's not something that was made up. Keep denying. You do that very well.
Nick
8:45 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Finally you admitted I'm correct! The only thing I forgot to mention, is that the republicans have hindered America with non-stop filibusters. Republican solutions are bogus and will hurt more people in the long run. Eliminating these safety nets will hurt the middle class and poor! Rewarding the upper class with tax cuts is wrong, since they haven't created any jobs! Its like giving someone a raise for under achieving. If these folks believe in this country, they should create jobs anyways. They don't need to be rewarded for doing what their supposed do! Also rich people, who decide on hiding their money overseas is also a problem and it needs to be addressed! Instead its shows that these rich folks don't respect this country and the need to contribute back to this nations well being! They get their money and run!
Richard Schulte
9:38 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
"The total obligation of the federal government to voters that is not funded at the present time is now $222 trillion. This does not mean that, over the entire life of the program, the government will be short $220 trillion. It means that the present value of the unfunded liability is $220 trillion. This means that the government would have to set aside $220 trillion immediately, invest this money in non-government projects that will pay a positive rate of return, and will therefore fund the amortization of this debt. I have written about the estimate here."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/the_government_is_bankrupt_and_will_destroy_the_economy
McCloud
8:50 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Thank God for the filibusters, otherwise we'd be deeper in on the massive debt this administration has created. I suggest you grab a book on capitalism, you clearly demonstrate no grasp on economics. ALso, read up on cities like Havanna, Moscow, and even some of these European countries to see how the safety nets worked out.
Richard Schulte
8:58 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Gallup Poll: Are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?
56% say no. 40% say yes.
The election is over. Hail to the Chief: President Romney.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/156776/swing-state-voters-say-no-better-off-2008.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=syndication&utm_content=morelink&utm_term=All%20Gallup%20Headlines%20-%20Politics
McCloud
9:20 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
So much for being bright when you cut and paste a portion of the S&P report after using a scapel to purposely ignore the massive spending as being the cause. As I remember it, Republicans caved in and voted for ceiling increase based on imaginary cuts that obviously the rating agency saw through. Credit rating is based on mathematics, and would not have been at stake without massive spending.
Sully
10:35 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
The whole report is there for you to see. Go ahead and read it.
Sully
10:38 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Republicans caved? No, they finally stood up to the tea party faction that didn't care if the country defaulted, hurting an untold number of Americans.
Ed Sapeta
9:25 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
It makes me Laugh when people quote Sources like American Thinker ( A great Oxymoron if there ever was one) . Blog is controlled by Thomas Lipson, a noted Right wing radical. People who use sources like this just prove they have no minds of their own.
Richard Schulte
9:42 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Facts are facts and this is a fact:
"The total obligation of the federal government to voters that is not funded at the present time is now $222 trillion. This does not mean that, over the entire life of the program, the government will be short $220 trillion. It means that the present value of the unfunded liability is $220 trillion. This means that the government would have to set aside $220 trillion immediately, invest this money in non-government projects that will pay a positive rate of return, and will therefore fund the amortization of this debt. I have written about the estimate here."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/the_government_is_bankrupt_and_will_destroy_the_economy
The fact that this information was taken from the American Thinker website just change the facts. $222 trillion dollars-guess what Mr. Sapeta? You're broke and so is every man, woman and child in America. You just haven't figured it out yet.
Sully
10:51 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
How much money that was "not funded" was used for Bush's war? You're so busy directing all of your hate at Obama, you can't see the whole picture.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate
-it's not great, but it could be worse. Look at 1982 for example.
Richard Schulte
9:45 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Sully: "How do you support yourself when you sit on the computer all day complaining?"
I now live in Sherwood Forest. I bought a bow and a quiver of arrows. My little band of merry men rob "fat cat" Democrats and give to the poor and destitute.
Sully
10:53 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
So you're still unemployed then. What happened to the great Mecca of Florida? You should be working 24/7, shouldn't you?
Richard Schulte
9:53 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Rasmussen-8/20/2012: Romney 44% / Obama 43%
Florida: Romney 45% / Obama 43%
Ohio: Romney 45% / Obama 45%
Wisconsin: Romney 48% / Obama 47%
Based upon the above, it looks like Obama is in big trouble with the economy going south once again. The unemployment rate rose in 44 states last month. Ooops.
Richard Schulte
10:43 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Sure hope that Iran doesn't start something in the Middle East:
"Defense spending accounted for 39 percent of the federal budget in 1970, said Ryan (who was born that year), but accounts for only 16 percent today. Under current budget pressures, it is at risk of going far lower."
Source: http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbarone/2012/08/20/romney_and_ryan_turn_the_tables_on_obama/page/2
Sully
10:57 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Absolutely clueless.
Richard Schulte
11:08 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Yes, Sully, you are absolutely clueless.
Richard Schulte
10:54 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Converting liberals to conservatives:
"He has spoken the truth about how liberals view conservatives (skip to the 1:55 mark for this part):
Liberals think that conservatives are:
a) Old
b) Stupid
c) Evil
d) Some of the above
e) All of the above"
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/08/confessions_of_an_ex-liberal.html#ixzz246Omxuea
And folks, that's how it's done. The American Thinker website is excellent.
Richard Schulte
11:02 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Sully: "So you're still unemployed then. What happened to the great Mecca of Florida? You should be working 24/7, shouldn't you?"
Sully, I have only be unemployed once in my life-2 months back in 1979 (Carter Administration) when I moved to California.
I've been employed all through the Obama Depression-employment is not the problem. Like many people who work in the United States, I only make money when I sell something. No sales, no paycheck, but since you have no clue how the private sector actually works, I wouldn't expect you to understand.
Sully
11:38 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
But wait a minute... Didn't you post before that you were unemployed because of Obama?
Richard Schulte
12:03 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Sully: "Didn't you post before that you were unemployed because of Obama?"
And where have I ever said that? There is a difference between being underemployed and unemployed. Quite a big difference.
In 2009, my business droped by 90 percent from previous years. In the thread above, I have said that my son is unemployed, as are 50 percent of the college graduates who have graduated since 2007.
The unemployment rate among architects may have been as high as 40 percent in the last 4 years. The building construction industry has been decimated. Don't believe it? Look around-don't see any big construction cranes around do you? Do you know why? Because they aren't building buildings.
No need to build new retail space when half the old retail space is vacant. (You can see that yourself, if you bother to observe.)
The union halls are full of iron workers, electricians and pipe fitters sitting around waiting to go back to work. All that skilled labor being wasted.
I met a union electrician last December-he lived on the South Side of Chicago and was working at the AT&T store on Chicago Avenue in Evanston. No he wasn't installing an electrical system at the ATT store, he was selling telephone service. Yep, imagine that. Traveling that far to find work.
Sully, you are absolutely clueless about what's happening in the real world.
Sully
11:39 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Now if you can't sell anything, wouldn't that be your fault? Where's the responsibility?
Richard Schulte
12:19 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
I have a friend who sells cars for a living-he's been doing that for about 35 years now. Before the 2008 election, he used to sell between 18 to 20 cars a month and make between $6 and $8 thousand monthly. When things were really bad, his sales went down to 2 cars a month and he was making $1 thousand a month. Things are better now-he might sell 5 or 6 cars a month-yep, he's making $2 thousand a month now. There are days when he's at the dealership for 13 hours and he doesn't talk to a single potential customer. No sales, no commission.
So is it the salesman (who has a great track record of selling cars) fault that he doesn't sell any cars when there are no potential customers?
If developers aren't building buildings, is it the iron worker, the electrician, plumber, the pipe fitter fault that they have no work? If developers aren't building buildings, is it the architects and engineers fault that architects and engineers have no work?
I'd say anyone who asks the question that you just did is an idiot.
This nonsense has been going on for 3-1/2 years now with no end in sight if Obama is re-elected. Yes, it is Obama's fault. When Romney takes office, you will see how quickly things change. It's a leadership problem-Obama is as clueless as you are Sully.
Sully
12:51 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Gosh Rich, since you are obviously the smartest and wisest man on the planet, why don't you run for president? I'm sure you'd have this economy running smoothly just one day in office.
Dan Arenov
12:35 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
AOL's stock price went up in July. They are reaching out to Sully and Schulte to thank them for their fine work and offer them one month of AOL service with a limit of 720 hrs.
Patch is now able to charge eleven dollars for an advertisement because of the web clicks they're getting!
Sully
12:48 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Just doing what I can to help out the economy!
Richard Schulte
12:50 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
I think I should get a medal or a plaque from Patch for answering questions from Sully, the alien life form from Planet Stupiter.
McCloud
12:56 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Help out the economy - You didn't do that, you may be smart but thers alot smart people out there.
Sully
1:11 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Humor, McCloud. I was being facetious.
Richard Schulte
1:06 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Sully: "Gosh Rich, since you are obviously the smartest and wisest man on the planet, why don't you run for president?"
Governor Romney asked me to run with him, but I declined. I told him that I was just too busy answering questions for Sully, the alien life form from the Planet Stupiter
McCloud
1:21 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
I was quoting the President, but come to think of it, I may not have since I had help along the way.
Terri
1:55 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Rich on Rush: The process you described is a type of self-brainwashing. You started out reasonable and rationale as shown by your first reaction “The first day I listened, I said to myself, this Rush guy is an ass.” But instead of turning it off, you subjected yourself to more. And with each succeeding session, you went deeper and deeper in to the black hole of lies, misinformation and propaganda. Frankly, it is probably too late for you, as it is for many who have drunk the Kool-Aid of hate. So now you feed it, the way a junkie feeds a drug habit. You find new sources to make your anger justifiable. You call people names and try and insult them. Instead of political debate you diatribe. In short you have become what is wrong with our country.
I hope that one day you find your way back to the light of reason, logic and facts.
Richard Schulte
4:26 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Terri on Rich on Rush: "The process you described is a type of self-brainwashing. You started out reasonable and rationale as shown by your first reaction “The first day I listened, I said to myself, this Rush guy is an ass.” But instead of turning it off, you subjected yourself to more. And with each succeeding session, you went deeper and deeper in to the black hole of lies, misinformation and propaganda."
You might think that, but it's hardly the process. It's no accident that conservatives are older than your typical liberal. Young folks are preyed on by liberals because young folks are gullible because of their lack of life experience. As one gets older, one's thinking matures and with maturity one begins to understand conservative principles.
Liberalism is based upon emotion, while conservativism is based upon rational thought.
It's not by accident that men are more likely to be conservatives than women, particularly single women. You can call that sexist, and I'm sure that you will, but that's just basic biology.
McClound has named some of the lies our "miserable failure" of a president, President Obama, has been peddling recently. To accuse Rush Limbaugh of lying without naming some of the lies is a tactic of liberals. Perhaps you would like to give us some examples of Rush's lies. (And, certainly Sully and Nick are welcome to join in with the documentation of Limbaugh's lies.")
Richard Schulte
2:25 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Just another example of how cold-hearted and callous those conservative Republicans are and how warm-hearted and generous those liberals are:
"Utah was followed by Washington, Mississippi, Alabama, and Tennessee. Utah topped the list with 10.6% of median income given to charity. By contrast, true blue Massachusetts gave only 2.8%.
Don't you wish those conservatives weren't so heartless and uncaring about the poor?"
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/08/the_most_generous_states_in_america_republican_and_religious.html#ixzz247E7HS24
Could it be that the left are the cold-hearted and callous ones and those conservative types the warm-hearted and generous folks? I'd have to say that's what this study shows.
Who knew that Sully, Nick and Terri were so cold-hearted? Could it be that they are actually the "haters"?
Conrad
4:00 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Mr Schulte you do exactly what you accuse others of doing. You say that some posters demand they be agreed with and if they're not, they insult those who are doing the disagreeing. That is what you do sir. If you represent everyone in the Tea Party, it is no wonder so many have a negative view of who they are.
McCloud
2:25 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
black hole of lies, misinformation and propaganda? Sounds like the Obama campaign, "We didn't accuse Mr Romney of being a felon", Case in point - "Romney is a felon", "Romney is a murderer", "Romney has not paid taxes for ten years". No, nothing is out of bounds for our delusional leader and the press will not make a big deal out of any of it.
Richard Schulte
4:43 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Conrad (the Moderate Republican): "Mr Schulte you do exactly what you accuse others of doing. You say that some posters demand they be agreed with and if they're not, they insult those who are doing the disagreeing. That is what you do sir. If you represent everyone in the Tea Party, it is no wonder so many have a negative view of who they are."
Beg your pardon Conrad, but you are mistaken. I am polite to anyone who is polite to me, however, if you are impolite or get in my face, I will respond in kind.
This guy Sully is quite vile and obnoxious-read Sully's posts if you don't believe me. Sully is a student of Alinsky's tactics and I simply use Alinsky's tactics back on him. I am not intimidated by Sully's b.s. Sully simply uses Democrat talking points. After fooling around with Sully on Patch for over a year, I have little regard for him because he is dishonest.
With respect to your comments further up the thread, you weren't even aware that neither I, nor Rush Limbaugh, are Republicans. TEA party folks simply don't care about what you or anybody else thinks about them. The TEA party is not an organized party, but just a very large group of citizens who are concerned about the future of America.
Anyone who suggests that debate on political issues be stifled (thank you Archie Bunker) simply because you don't like what is being said is an authoritarian. Excuse me if I despise people who authoritarians. Moderates are wimps.
Richard Schulte
4:52 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
From Newsweek: "Hit the road, Barack
"In an unguarded moment earlier this year, the president commented that the private sector of the economy was “doing fine.” Certainly, the stock market is well up (by 74 percent) relative to the close on Inauguration Day 2009. But the total number of private-sector jobs is still 4.3 million below the January 2008 peak. Meanwhile, since 2008, a staggering 3.6 million Americans have been added to Social Security’s disability insurance program. This is one of many ways unemployment is being concealed."
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/08/19/niall-ferguson-on-why-barack-obama-needs-to-go.html
Obama has got to go.
Sully
7:40 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Want something else to read, Richie? Here ya go-
http://m.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/08/as-a-harvard-alum-i-apologize/261308/
Sully
7:50 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
"Some claims Ferguson ( the author of the Newsweek article) has offered in recent years have been attention-getting and mostly wrong. Joe Weisenthal of Business Insider has an analysis here (and please also see this from Noah Smith). For instance:
- U.S. budget deficits were going to lead to a US-China breakup. They didn't.
- U.S. budget deficits were going to drive bond rates sky high. The opposite has occurred.
- U.S. budget deficits will make us like Greece. They have not.
- A year ago, Ferguson warned that we were on the verge of a damaging new round of inflation. We were not."
Terri
5:29 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Rich, I only have a second to respond as am NOT single female and have three young children needing my attn. Your point to life experience does not jive with the life experience of my family elders. I have parents and grandparents who have voted both republican and democrat in their lifetimes. It used to be that educated people voted on candidates and platforms, not party lines. My father voted for Nixon and Reagan. He now campaigns for Obama because he is so disgusted by the dumbing down of the republican party. Yes, it hurts his own pocket book, but he has the futures of six grandchildren to think about. My living grandparents, in their 90's, have lost their filters and can no longer speak of the neocon radicals in civil terms. I'd say they have some life experience under their belts. They are also hit hard financially under democrat policy, but they have social consciences and ethics. My in-laws, blue-collar conservatives from Dayton, OH, have even seen the light (FINALLY turned off FOX) and realized the tables are being slanted against them by the greedy right-wing. It's not an issue of age, it's an issue of intellect.
Richard Schulte
7:40 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Terri: "Yes, it hurts his own pocket book, but he has the futures of six grandchildren to think about."
Terri, thank you for your response. Your response is rather interesting.
I just Googled one of the Rush quotes which you cited in your next post and came up with all sorts of interesting stuff. I going through that now. It seems that there is quite a lot of interest in what Rush has to say from the left.
This morning I posted a link to an article on the National Debt and the Federal Government commitments to future spending. I don't expect you to take a look at the link, so let me summarize. Today, the National Debt stands near $16 trillion, plus or minus a few billions of dollars. The National Debt is roughly equal to the US Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Of more interest however, is the fact that the Federal Government has made commitments to pay roughly $222 trillion to its citizens. $222 trillion is 13.875 times the present day GDP. In other words, the US Gov't would have to confiscate the value of all the goods and services produced in the US for 14 straight years in order to meet its future commitments.
It really doesn't take a lot of brain power to understand that the commitments made by the Gov't can't be fulfilled. If you are concerned about your children, then it seem obvious that something needs to be done. The US Gov't simply cannot continue the spending spree.
Richard Schulte
8:07 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Terri: "It's not an issue of age, it's an issue of intellect."
Oh, but it is an issue of age. When I was young, I thought by parents were dumb. All children do. However, as I aged I began to understand the decisions that my parents made. The older I get, the more I realize just how smart my parents were. And the older I get, the more appreciation that I have for my parents.
In my life, the smartest person I ever met was my dad's grandfather. He had a 3rd grade education. No one would say that my grandfather had a towering intellect, but what made him so smart was the fact that he had common sense. Intellect and common sense are not the same.
Some people are more intellectual than others and some people have more common sense. It is rare that people are both highly intellectual and have a high level of common sense.
I think that there is little doubt that Obama is intelligent, but his presidency has been a failure. No doubt his economic advisors are intelligent too, but the Obama Administration has failed to revive the US economy. Simply being highly intelligent is not enough. The presidency is a management position. No president has sufficient knowledge to be up on everything and therefore must be able to be a good manager. A good manager surrounds himself or herself with the best people he can find. Many of those people will be smarter than the manager, but the manager brings people together and uses them to accomplish what needs to be done.
Richard Schulte
8:14 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
While President Obama may be intelligent, he is not a good manager. Obama is a rigid idealogue. Obama's rigidity means that he simply can't adapt to changing circumstances.
Obamacare could have been a success if he had worked on the concept with both Democrats and Republicans. President Clinton had to work with Newt Gingrich to get things done and he did. President Obama refuses to work with the opposition.
It is unfortunate that Obama was teamed up with Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Speaker Pelosi is also a rigid idealogue. But thos together and what we got was the toxic Obamacare bill. The Obamacare bill essentially killed Obama's presidency. Can't do anything about that now.
Terri
5:33 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
You want it, you got it. Rush Limbaugh”s viewpoints simply have no basis in fact or reality. Here are a few whoppers, with many more listed in the source material:
1. "It has not been proven that nicotine is addictive, the same with cigarettes causing emphysema [and other diseases]." (Radio show, 4/29/94)
2. LIMBAUGH: On the Republicans' "Contract With America": "The New York Times never ran anything on the contract 'til after the election. The rest of the news media hardly talked about it at all." (TV, 4/6/95)
REALITY: In the 42 days between the announcement of the "Contract with America" and the Nov. 8, 1994 election, the New York Times published 45 articles that mentioned the contract--more than one a day. The Nexis computer database reports that more than 1400 pieces mentioning the contract were published before the election.
3. LIMBAUGH: "Banks take the risks in issuing student loans and they are entitled to the profits." (Radio show, quoted in FRQ, Summer/93)
REALITY: Banks take no risks in issuing student loans, which are federally insured.
Terri
5:34 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
4. LIMBAUGH: Comparing the 1950s with the present: "And I might point out that poverty and economic disparities between the lower and upper classes were greater during the former period." (Told You So, p. 84)
REALITY: Income inequality, as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau, fell from the 1940s to the late 1960s, and then began rising. Inequality surpassed the 1950 level in 1982 and rose steadily to all-time highs in 1992. (Census Bureau's "Money Income of Households, Families and Persons in the United States")
5. LIMBAUGH: "Oh, how they relished blaming Reagan administration policies, including the mythical reductions in HUD's budget for public housing, for creating all of the homeless! Budget cuts? There were no budget cuts! The budget figures show that actual construction of public housing increased during the Reagan years." (Ought to Be, p. 242-243)
REALITY: In 1980, 20,900 low-income public housing units were under construction; in 1988, 9,700, a decline of 54 percent ;Statistical Abstracts of the U.S).In terms of 1993 dollars, the HUD budget for the construction of new public housing was slashed from $6.3 billion in 1980 to $683 million in 1988. "We're getting out of the housing business. Period," a Reagan HUD official declared in 1985.
6. LIMBAUGH: "There's no such thing as an implied contract." (Radio show, quoted in FRQ, Spring/93)
REALITY: Every first-year law student knows there is.
Source:
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1895
Sully
7:29 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
And more recently-
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jul/18/rush-limbaugh/rush-limbaugh-claims-link-between-batmans-bane-and/
Rush Limbaugh claims link between Batman’s Bane and Romney’s Bain.
www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jun/28/rush-limbaugh/health-care-law-not-largest-tax-increase-us-histor/
Limbaugh, GOP have it wrong: Health care law is not the largest tax increase ever.
Just Sayin
8:29 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
R&R are dead in the water. Barack will win again. Schulte & McCloud, aka Dumb & Dumber, the Patch's resident idiots are dead wrong about everything as usual. Nothing new here tonight. LOL.
Richard Schulte
8:31 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Sully: "Some claims Ferguson ( the author of the Newsweek article) has offered in recent years have been attention-getting and mostly wrong. Joe Weisenthal of Business Insider has an analysis here (and please also see this from Noah Smith)."
Sully, my interest in this article was not the contents of the article, but the cover of Newsweek which accompanied the article. Even the mainstream media is questioning Obama.
Sully
9:20 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Of course.
Sully
9:56 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
I'm still wondering, Richard- how is it you have so much time to sit at your computer day after day after day posting on this little website. You're world renowned. Everybody knows your name. You'd think you'd be constantly hosting or lecturing at seminars or be working for some large firm in New York or California, or even in Chicago. Surely you'd be doing something productive if you are as good as you seem to think you are. Yet there you are, supposedly living in the redneck riviera part of Florida. Considering I'm from the south and spent many summer days on the gulf coast in my youth, I think I'm fairly qualified to say that location is not the greatest area to live in. It's great if you own a condo and are on the beach, but that's usually the "second home", not the primary residence. I'm guessing you live in one of those apartment complexes that has not a lot of square footage. So what is a world renowned engineer whom everyone knows doing in a place like that? You couldn't have been doing that great before Obama got in office, because surely a man of your talent and intellect would have invested his money wisely and would therefore have plenty of funds available in case of a downturn. Well, I suppose I'll just have to keep,wondering because you're not going to give an honest answer if any answer at all.
McCloud
8:32 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Boy thats some weak stuff and a tremendous amount of effort to discredit Rush, me thinks he scares liberals a little, he makes too much sense. Anything but talk about the failure in the white house seems to be the campaign tactic.
Richard Schulte
6:00 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
McCloud is correct-the list of 6 items above is pretty trivial. Why reach back to 1994 for things that Rush has said? If Rush's lies everyday, why not talk about what Rush has said recently?
Rush has been taking a few days off, but he'll be back on the radio today. Let's have a discussion of Rush's lies from today's broadcast or recent broadcasts.
It's rather interesting how the left works. Rather than address ideas, the left attacks people. Reagan dumb. Bush dumb. Limbaugh socio-path. Palin dumb. TEA party haters.
Air America, the left's answer to Rush, failed within 2 years despite being proped up by large contributions from the left. Rush has been on the radio for 24+ years now and despite all of the attacks from the left, he's still going strong. Why?
The left refers to its opposition has "haters". Why all of the villification of the opposition? You don't see the right doing that-the right thinks that its opposition is amusing and that really makes the left angry. Yes, the right pretty much thinks that the left's ideas are laughable.
Terri
8:37 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Really Mccloud...what specifically is weak?
RB
9:10 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Did Rush have health insurance when he was ' Dr. shopping' for the OxyContin, or was he paying for them personally? I'm guessing he had health insurance and still does, despite his pre-existing addiction condition. The rest of us poor saps must worry about pre-existing conditions if living in the Limbaugh/Schulte era. But, I'm sure we'll continue to have some dang good Air Shows and Fiesta Bowl flyovers.
Ryan's cuts to Medicare via the voucher system will completely unhinge the fabric of the middle class, not to mention the insurance company profits will be bursting at the seams.....but that's the Republican way.
Nick
10:37 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
Plus the vouchers won't even keep up with the increase in medical costs. The voucher will be based off the cost of living index.
Richard Schulte
6:06 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
It's quite common for people who have had back surgery to become addicted to pain-killers. Since Rush is a mortal, it shouldn't be that surprising that he would become addicted to pain-killers after back surgery. (Yes I said it, Rush is a mere mortal.)
JFK, a hero to Democrats, was addicted to pain-killers. JFK also had a back injury. So RB, let's talk about JFK and his addictions. Rush is just a radio personality. JFK was the president of the United States while he was an addict.
With respect to health insurance, I don't believe that Rush carries health insurance. Rush has more than enough money to pay cash for any health services that he requires. I guess that's just another reason to "hate" Rush-he's got lots of money.
Richard Schulte
9:00 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
It's quite curious that RB would bring up drug use. Wasn't our Dear Leader a drug head? Didn't our Dear Leader admit that he was stoned all of the time when he was in high school and college? Rush is just a radio broadcaster. Obama is the President of the United States.
Isn't the use of drugs by the President of the United States of more concern that the use of drugs by a radio broadcaster?
And while we're at it, didn't the (Democrat) Lion of the Senate, Ted Kennedy let Mary Jo drown when he drove off a bridge while he was drunk? If Rush is evil because he became addicted to prescription pain-killers after back surgery, what does that make Ted Kennedy? Yet, Democrats continued to elect Ted Kennedy to the Senate term after term after term. Ted Kennedy should have been in prison for at least manslaughter. Imagine Mary Jo trapped in a submerged car and left to drown by the esteemed Senator Kennedy.
With people like JFK and Ted Kennedy on your side, please don't bring up Rush's addiction to painkillers.
Terri
10:19 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012
And you are correct, Mccloud. Rush is an extremely dangerous, sociopathic individual. The fact that he has brainwashed so many who tolerate being lied to and go back for more like drug addicts is indeed scary stuff. We know you didn't bother to read that "weak stuff." Why are you ok with being lied to? It didn't take much work to discredit Rush - he does it for himself on a daily basis. He is a fraud in every sense of the word.
Richard Schulte
6:13 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Terri: "It didn't take much work to discredit Rush - he does it for himself on a daily basis. He is a fraud in every sense of the word."
Well, if Rush lies everyday, we can talk about Rush's lies from today, rather than from 1994. He's on today from 11 am to 2 pm on WLS-AM 890 in Chicago. Partial transcripts of Rush's show are posted on Rush's website within a few hours.
This evening I will post things that Rush says and then Terri, Suly and Nick can point to the lies and fraudelent statements.
And while you're waiting for Rush's transcript to be posted, you can take a look at Rush's archive for transcripts from recent shows:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/
Go ahead and point out the lies. To quote Dirty Harry, "Make my day."
Sully
8:02 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
How 'bout this one for starters?
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/06/28/the_court_rules_obamacare_is_the_largest_tax_increase_in_the_history_of_the_world
Richard Schulte
5:41 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Two days ago, I posted information that the Federal agencies were purchasing boat-loads of hollow point ammunition. Nobody commenting on this thread seemed too interested. Well, let's try it again:
"Whom Does the Government Intend to Shoot?"
That's the question recently posed by retired Major General Jerry Curry in the Daily Caller, in light of horrifying reports that the Social Security Administration is buying 174,000 rounds of hollow-point bullets for distribution to 41 locations in the U.S.
According to Major General Curry, Social Security's ammo spree follows the purchase by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of 46,000 rounds of hollow-point ammunition. Will they be shooting fish in a barrel?
Most terrifying of all, Major General Curry reports that the Department of Homeland Security ordered 750 million rounds of hollow-point ammunition in March, then subsequently ordered an additional 750 million rounds, including bullets capable of penetrating walls.
"This is enough ammunition to empty five rounds into the body of every living American citizen," writes Major General Curry, who wonders what plan might require "so many dead Americans." "
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/will_obama_keep_power_by_any_means_necessary.html#ixzz24AwRnfdD
Just why is the Federal Government purchasing so much ammunition and why purchase hollow-point ammo? Note that there are no denials of this by the Federal Goverment.
Richard Schulte
8:52 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Sully, you're the Patch "know-it-all". What is the explanation for why the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is buying 1.5 billion rounds of ammunition-hollow point ammo no less?
RB, you thought is was a joke when I mentioned the possibility of civil war in April. Now, perhaps, you don't think it's so far-fetched or funny. It's quite obvious as to why the DHS is buying ammo. And our own government intends to use hollow-point ammo on its own citizens.
Obama will do anything to retain power. Ain't so funny anymore is it RB? Obama and Castro are no different, except for the beard and the uniform.
Richard Schulte
8:47 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Sully: How 'bout this one for starters?
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/06/28/the_court_rules_obamacare_is_the_largest_tax_
Sully strikes out-bad link. But if Obamacare is the largest tax increase in history, pray tell Sully, what is?
Sully
10:29 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-07-03/why-obamacares-tax-increase-isnt-the-biggest-ever
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/236611-health-law-mandate-isnt-largest-tax-despite-gop-claims
http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2012/jul/11/american-commitment/health-care-law-largest-tax-increase-history-middl/
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/wealth-poverty/health-care/biggest-tax-increase-since1993
"Joseph Thorndike: Director of the Tax History Project at Tax Analysts...says even after adjusting for inflation...
... The Clinton tax hike in '93 was substantially bigger and the Reagan tax hike of 1982 was really much bigger."
Let me know if you want more, Rich.
Terri
8:55 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
We're going to let you destroy your life. We're going to make it easy and then all of us who accept the responsibilities of life and don't destroy our lives on drugs, we'll pay for whatever messes you get into."
"If (Surgeon General Jocelyn Elders) wants to legalize drugs, send the people who want to do drugs to London and Zurich, and let's be rid of them."
-- Rush Limbaugh show, Dec 9, 1993
"There's nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.
"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use...The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh show, Oct. 5, 1995
Terri
8:56 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
So, no response to the lies he spews. Remind me again why you're ok with being lied to??
Richard Schulte
9:51 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Typical liberal. Snaps her fingers and thinks that we're supposed to jump. Sorry, but I sleep at night and then head to the gym in the morning. Just got back from the gym. Got to keep this 58 year old body in shape-I have the body of a 40 years old.
While I'm working on my response to your Rush lies list, Terri could provide us with an explanation why the Dept. of Homeland Security is purchasing 1.5 billion (yes, billion) rounds of ammo and why the ammunition is hollow-point ammo.
And if Rush's addiction to perscription pain-killers after back surgery is so evil, tell us all about the drug use of President Obama. And if Rush Limbaugh should have gotten jail time for perscription drug abuse, tell us why Ted Kennedy wasn't jailed for allowing Mary Jo to drown in Ted Kennedy's submerged car.
It's OK for Senator Kennedy to allow a young woman to drown in his submerged car after he drove off a bridge drunk without any penalty, but Rush has to be imprisoned because he was addicted to pain pills?
You folks are just too funny. How do you spell hypocrite?
McCloud
9:05 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Remind me again why you voted for a guy who wasted 1 trillion on stimulus money laundered to Green companies such as Solyndra, Abound Solar, Energy Conversion Devices, BrightSource, LSP Energy, Evergreen Solar, Ener1, SunPower, Beacon Power, ECOtality, A123, Uni-Solar, Azure Dynamics, and now Solar Trust. (the list is much longer as this one is old) .
McCloud
9:06 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Remind me again why you voted for a guy who has been a failure at turning the economy around, 1% GDP, record unemployment, credit downgrades, prodigious deficit spending, record foreclosures.
McCloud
9:07 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Remind me again why you wish to speak about Rush Limbaugh, oh never mind, it diverts away from a failed President.
Richard Schulte
10:07 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
What are you talking about McCloud, Obama says that "The private sector is doing fine."
Richard Schulte
10:05 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Oh no, say it ain't so. A poll of the County of Crook indicates that President Obama is below 50 percent:
"In the city of Chicago itself, he retains a 60-29 lead over Romney. But the Republican challenger leads 45-38 in the surrounding areas. Across the county as a whole, Romney leads 43-31 among independent voters, a crucial voting bloc. Romney also holds a 44-38 lead among male voters, and a 53-40 lead among white voters."
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/08/obama_underwater_in_cook_county.html#ixzz24C21eNww
Will Obama hold Illinois? Republican Bill Brady almost took the governorship away from Pat Quinn a little over 2 years ago. Brady won a majority of votes in 98 of Illinois' 102 counties.
I guess a whole lot of dead people will be voting in Chicago to make sure that Obama carries Illinois. Can dead people only vote once or are they permitted to vote multiple times in Chicago?
Richard Schulte
10:44 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Sully: "Joseph Thorndike: Director of the Tax History Project at Tax Analysts...says even after adjusting for inflation... ... The Clinton tax hike in '93 was substantially bigger and the Reagan tax hike of 1982 was really much bigger." Let me know if you want more, Rich.
Sully, that should suffice. I appreciate the information. But it's sort of a "my dog is bigger than your dog" point.
Richard Schulte
10:55 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Conrad: "If you represent everyone in the Tea Party, it is no wonder so many have a negative view of who they are."
"Don't retreat! Reload!" Sarah Palin
Sully
11:02 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Nice- let's' shoot up the ones who won't agree with us! After all, they're not real Americans anyway. We're the only ones who can say who is a true patriot.
Sully
10:59 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Sure thing Rich. You asked for proof and I gave it to you. I assume you didn't look at the other links of others stating the same, that "Obamacare" is NOT the largest tax increase in history. You see Rich, we give you proof but as always, you discount it. You have no legitimate response so you say something totally irrelevant.
Richard Schulte
12:26 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
"Tampa, Fla. - Promising that Tuesday's convention theme "will honor the fact that it is the drive, determination and sacrifice of America's job creators and millions of hard-working American men and women who made the United States the exceptional nation it is," Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus today announced that Tuesday's theme for the 2012 Republican National Convention will be "We Built It."
At a campaign rally in Roanoke, Virginia, last month, President Obama declared, "if you've got a business, you didn't build that." Priebus said that Tuesday's convention proceedings "will remind America that we are a nation made great not by Washington but by the men and women who summoned the inner drive, discipline and persistent effort to achieve their dreams within the free enterprise system."
Convention CEO William Harris said, "Tuesday's program will highlight America's entrepreneurial strength and our people's incomparable work ethic." "
Richard Schulte
5:41 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
This is worth a look. Obama's real father-Frank Marshall Davis, Communist Party USA member:
http://www.obamasrealfather.com/
RB
6:54 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
More BS from Schulte. Mr. Obama's father was Baracka Obama. Period!
McCloud
7:00 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
I heard the brother lives in a hut in Africa. Strange thing too, Obama referred to a sister, who does exist accrording to some sources, but isn't it strange that he has a sister and not many know of her? Mysteries continue with this guy, who was escorted into the white house by the ABC, NBC, CBS and other media outlets who looked the other way in their job. I mean we heard about a dog on the car roof details already with Romney.
Terri
9:55 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Really, you want to compare Obama experimenting with drugs in college to a grown man who publicly accused drug users of destroying society and condemning them to a lifetime in jail. And then becomes a full-fledged drug addict!! Really?? No really.
Mccloud: U.S. couldn't compete against China with their government investing billions upon billions in solar while our climate-change denying, oil-loving GOP blocked all of Obama's green energy initiatives.
There are a multitude of wonderful accomplishments by President Obama, some stand outs are mitigating the most dire economic situation since the Great Depression, saving the auto industry, passing equal pay for women, repealing DADT and the Affordable Heathcare Act. Clearly Obamacare is not as good as the single-payer on which he campaigned and was elected, but thanks to Palin/Rush/Beck and their death-panel fear tactics (all lies), he caved to the misinformed masses. Who knows what he could have accomplished w/o being blocked at every turn by elected officials who care more about preventing an Obama 2nd term than serving their constituents.
Yeah, can't deny or refute that Rush lies to you. It's undisputable fact. On that note, like addicts or victims of abuse, you can't be helped unless you want to get better. You brainwashed addicts don't want to know the truth because that would spell the end of your hate addiction on which you live and breathe. The lies comfort you like Oxycontin to a drug addict.
Richard Schulte
6:35 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Terri: "Yeah, can't deny or refute that Rush lies to you. It's undisputable fact. On that note, like addicts or victims of abuse, you can't be helped unless you want to get better. You brainwashed addicts don't want to know the truth because that would spell the end of your hate addiction on which you live and breathe. The lies comfort you like Oxycontin to a drug addict."
Well, there you go again. I've been listening to Rush since October 1994-almost 18 years now. Rush's "lies" that Terri listed above seem pretty trivial to me, particularly in comparison to the falsehoods being put forth by the left/Democrats.
"I did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky." was a falsehood put forth by President Clinton. Not even President Clinton claims this to be true, but Clinton's impeachment wasn't about sex. It was about committing perjury in a sexual harrassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones while being the nation's chief law enforcment officer.
Now, if we move on to the Bush Administration, you might recall the debate about WMD in Iraq. Iraq used chemical weapons in the Iraq/Iran War-fact. So there is no doubt that Iraq had chemical weapons at one time, but American military forces did not find any chemical weapons during its invasion/occupation of Iraq. Now we are finding Iraq's chemical weapons turning up in Syria. Yes, artillery shells filled with chemical weapons with Iraqi Army markings. And now you know where the WMD went-to Syria.
Richard Schulte
6:40 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
(Contined from below)
So we can say that "Bush lied, people died." is a lie in itself. The WMD (chemical weapons) existed in Iraq, but were moved to Syria prior to the start of hostilities just as high ranking Iraqi military officers who defected said happened.
Richard Schulte
7:06 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Terri: "There are a multitude of wonderful accomplishments by President Obama, some stand outs are mitigating the most dire economic situation since the Great Depression, saving the auto industry, passing equal pay for women, repealing DADT and the Affordable Heathcare Act."
And now to the Obama lies (which Terri appears to actually believe).
Obama saved the auto industry? United Airlines declared bankruptcy in 2002, but United Airlines is still operating. Delta Airlines declared bankruptcy in 2005, but is still operating. American Airlines declared bankruptcy in 2011, but is still operating. The bankruptcy of a corporation does not mean that the corporation ceases operation.
What Obama actually did was save the United Auto Workers union. Non-union auto manufacturers such as Toyota, Nissan, Honda, Hyundai and Kia survived the recession, as did Ford Motor Company, without bailouts. Now, GM is headed back to bankruptcy because the fix that Obama imposed on GM didn't fix the problem. The problem is the United Auto Workers union.
Sorry Terri, the above are facts, regardless of whether or not you want to believe it. Yes, the UAW caused GM to go into bankruptcy.
Now to Obamacare. Obama claimed that Obamacare would "bend the cost curve down". In fact, Obamacare will increase the cost of health care and lower the quality of health care provided. There is already a doctor shortage in the US and many doctors will be leaving the field due to Obamacare.
Richard Schulte
7:15 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Terri: "There are a multitude of wonderful accomplishments by President Obama, some stand outs are mitigating the most dire economic situation since the Great Depression, saving the auto industry, passing equal pay for women, repealing DADT and the Affordable Heathcare Act."
You may recall that Obama told us that if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Obama also told us that if you like your health insurance plan, you can keep it. Sounds great, and, in fact, it sounds to great to be true, doesn't it. In fact, it is too good to be true. How do you keep your doctor if your doctor decides to leave the practice of medicine because of Obamacare? How do you keep your health insurance plan if your health insurer decides to leave the the health insurance business because the company can no longer make a profit?
The purpose of Obamacare is to force health insurance companies out of business by mandating all sorts of minimum coverages. The purpose of forcing health insurers out of business is to usher in single-payer (socialist) health care.
If socialist health care is introduced in the United States, where will Canadians go for health care when they really need it? People from all over the world come to the US for health care because the health care system in the US is the best in the world.
Why would we want to junk the best health system in the world for something that is inferior? Obamacare is not about health care, it's about control.
Terri
10:19 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
that was to say "indisputable" fact.
Nick
11:00 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Rush took so many Oxycontin's in life, that it ruined his hearing. I bet his insurance paid for his cochlear implant! Even though he was a chronic abuser and did the damage himself!
Richard Schulte
4:52 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Nick is correct, one of the side-effects of Oxycontin is hearing loss. Rush is deaf. Imagine doing a radio show when you are deaf. This is a testament to Rush's brilliance.
With respect to whether or not Rush's cochlear implant was covered by insurance, I'll take that bet Nick. If I recall correctly, Rush is self-insured when it comes to health insurance-no need for Rush to carry health insurance, Rush is independently wealthy.
Richard Schulte
5:04 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
And now we know the story of Barack Obama's birth certificate and why it was such a secret. Barack Obama's father was not Barack Obama, Sr., but rather Frank Marshall Davis. Frank Marshall Davis was a member of the Communist Party USA. If you have any doubts whether or not this is true, compare side-by-side photographs of Obama and Davis.
http://www.obamasrealfather.com/
"Frank Marshall Davis (1905-1987) was a Communist Party USA (CPUSA) propagandist in Chicago and Hawaii, as well as a writer and poet. The FBI had Davis under investigation or surveillance for 19 years, compiling a 600-page FBI file. He was on the FBI's 'Security Index A', meaning he would be arrested in the event of national emergency."
"At age 18, Barack Obama admittedly arrived at Occidental College a committed revolutionary Marxist. What was the source of Obama's foundation in Marxism? Throughout his 2008 Presidential campaign and term in office, questions have been raised regarding Barack Obama's family background, economic philosophy, and fundamental political ideology. Dreams from My Real Father is the alternative Barack Obama "autobiography," offering a divergent theory of what may have shaped our 44th President's life and politics."
Source: http://www.obamasrealfather.com/
Sully
6:59 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Look people, It's been established without doubt that Richard is paranoid delusional. His latest assertion, that Obama is building up an arsenal to use against the American people when he loses the election, is pretty much the final nail. He also advocates for civil war. We should let him rant in peace. No matter how many facts to the contrary, he will never believe Rush lies and will always believe the left is "evil". Why waste anymore time on him. I love to debate, but it's not worth it with someone like Rich.
Richard Schulte
7:42 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Sully: "Look people, It's been established without doubt that Richard is paranoid delusional. His latest assertion, that Obama is building up an arsenal to use against the American people when he loses the election, is pretty much the final nail. He also advocates for civil war."
Well, there goes Sully again (using his Alinsky tactics). Let's start making stuff up about Schulte. Civil war? Where have I advocated for civil war? In fact, what I have mentioned is the peaceful break-up of the United States into separate countries consisting of red states and blue states to end the bitter political debate. Sounds pretty peaceful to me.
What Sully has failed to explain is why the Obama Administration is in the process of purchasing 2 billion (yes, billion) rounds of hollow-point ammunnition. Why does the Federal Government need 2 billion rounds of hollow-point ammunition Sully? And why hollow-point ammunition? The only purpose of hollow-point bullets is to maim people.
What Sully has also failed to address is the revelation that Barack Obama looks remarkably similar to Frank Marshall Davis, a member of the Communist Party USA. The Obama birth certificate issue is not new news, but what is new is that it appears that Obama's father is actually Frank Marshall Davis.
Is Obama a marxist? Frank Marshall Davis was a marxist. Acquaintences of Obama have said that Obama was a marxist in college.
A president who is a marxist and 2 billion rounds of ammunition?
Richard Schulte
7:48 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Well Sully, we're waiting for your explanation of why Barack Obama looks remarkably like Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist Party USA member. Is Obama's father really Frank Marshall Davis? Is that why all the mystery about Obama's birth certificate?
And we're also waiting for Sully's explanation of why the Federal Government is purchasing 2 billion rounds of hollow-point ammunition? Why does the Department of Homeland Security need 1.5 billion (yes, billion) rounds of hollow-point ammunition?
Inquiring minds would like to know.
Richard Schulte
8:33 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
According to PPP, Romney leads Obama by just under 4 percent in Michigan. Another blue state is about to fall into the Romney column? Ooops, Romney landslide.
Richard Schulte
8:56 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Republican Senator Scott Brown leads Democrat Elizabeth Warren (D) in the race for Ted Kennedy's former seat:
"Republican Sen. Scott Brown leads Democrat Elizabeth Warren in Massachusetts, according to a new poll from Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling.
Brown leads Warren 49 percent to 44 percent. The survey of 1,115 likely voters was conducted Aug. 16-19, and has a 2.9 percent margin of error. In the previous survey from late June, the two were tied of 46 percent apiece."
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/danieldoherty/2012/08/21/boom_brown_49_warren_44
Republican landslide in November.
Richard Schulte
11:52 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
OMG, the leftists have been silenced.
The leftists can't explain why the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is buying 1.5 billion rounds of ammunition right before the presidential election. (No mistake, that's billion, not million.) That's 5 bullets for every man, woman and child in America.
And then their is the resemblance between Frank Marshall Davis and Barack Obama. There is no doubt that Frank Marshall Davis, a member of the Communist Party USA, is Barack Obama's father.
(Is that what Breitbart discovered? Don't know, Breitbart is dead.)
Ooops, Obama is outed as a marxist 2-1/2 months before the presidential election. How do you say Republican landslide (if the election is actually held)?
I guess the cat has got Sully's tongue.
Richard Schulte
12:43 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Terri, the effects of Obamacare. The "law of unintended consequences" at work:
"A recent study found that investment in medical research and development will fall by $2 billion per year because of the device tax—and that is a cautious estimate. R&D dollars drive innovation and innovation lowers costs, so the tax’s adverse effect on investment will keep expensive medical devices from becoming affordable and widely available in the future."
Richard Schulte
12:47 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
"Whatever costs cannot be passed along to patients will be absorbed by the medical device companies, which will lead businesses to cut jobs as they tread water to stay afloat. One study found that, depending on the elasticity of the tax, the medical device industry will be forced to fire between 14,500 and 47,100 workers—up to 10% of the workforce."
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/08/20/tax_within_a_tax_obamacare_medical_device_tax_will_significantly_increase_cost_of_procedures
Richard Schulte
1:02 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
More side-by-side photos of Frank Marshall Davis and Barack Obama:
http://www.google.com/search?q=frank+marshall+davis&hl=en&prmd=imvnso&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=9hs1UIHoAcjgrAHy6oFg&sqi=2&ved=0CCkQsAQ&biw=857&bih=422
Me
3:03 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
So are you saying that communism is genetic???????
Richard Schulte
1:20 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
A little more about Frank Marshall Davis and Barack Obama:
"While the Left has willingly dismissed Frank Marshall Davis, he was indisputably a pro-Soviet, pro-Red China communist. A card-carrying member of the Communist Party USA, he is cited by the Associated Press as an “important influence” on Barack Obama, one whom he “looked to” not merely for “advice on living” but also as a “father” figure. Aided by access to declassified FBI files, Soviet archives, and Davis’s original newspaper columns, Paul Kengor charts the progression of Davis’s communist ideas from Chicago to Hawaii, where he edited and wrote for communist newspapers, and where, in the 1970s, he came into Obama’s life."
http://www.heritage.org/events/2012/07/the-communist
OMG,Sully's got nothing to say. Well Sully, you can say "Aloha Obama".
Conrad
2:12 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
I would rather he say "Grow up".
Grow up Mr. Schulte.
Richard Schulte
4:10 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Obama's America 2016 http://2016themovie.com/
A list of theaters in Illinois: http://2016themovie.com/theaters/?state=IL
A documentary by Dinesh D'Souza
The movie trailer: http://2016themovie.com/media/
Quite interesting, don't you think Comrades? "From Russia With Love"
Richard Schulte
5:30 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
"There's one way to find out if a man is honest - ask him. If he says, "Yes," you know he is a crook." Marx
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/groucho_marx_3.html#jWrJXdJkwwE8vARO.99
RB
2:51 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Conspiracy theorists unite! Mr. Schulte, you're simply an amplifier for what's becoming the Republican Party. That's sad, but history will show this phase as one similar to the McCarthy era. It too shall pass.
Our former Speaker had something interesting to say about the Ryan pick (if anyone is interested in remaining on topic)....
“All you need to know is that the House Republicans were willing to shut down the government rather than fund Planned Parenthood,” said Representative Nancy Pelosi, the House Democratic leader, in an e-mail on Tuesday. “This is in keeping with their efforts — whether it’s Congressman Akin or Chairman Ryan or others — to deny investments in critical women’s health services, weaken the definition of rape, and take away access to preventive care like cervical and breast cancer screenings.”
Richard Schulte
4:14 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Isn't Nancy Pelosi the one who said: "We have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV-05TLiiLU
That Nancy Pelosi is one brilliant woman.
Richard Schulte
4:20 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Me: "So are you saying that communism is genetic???????"
In response to your brilliant question, let me respond by quoting a little Marx:
"A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five."
"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read."
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies."
This last Marx quote describes the Obama Administration perfectly.
Read more at
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/groucho_marx.html#0kybBYVrdWAzX0AD.99
Sully
4:28 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Groucho Marx?
Richard Schulte
4:40 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
"The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made."
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/groucho_marx.html#QPK4B9jiGJWfdziw.99
Sully
4:29 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Enough said.
Richard Schulte
4:43 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
"Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others."
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/groucho_marx_2.html#M19gCXRqRv5Xgvr7.99
Columbo
4:29 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Any more wasteful stimulus or jobs bills those rascal Republicans keep blocking. Lord knows we'd be completely out of this mess if we passed 5 or 6 more.
Richard Schulte
4:33 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Obama's America 2016
"Across the globe and in America, people in 2008 hungered for a leader who would unite and lift us from economic turmoil and war. True to America’s ideals, they invested their hope in a new kind of president, Barack Obama. What they didn’t know is that Obama is a man with a past, and in powerful ways that past defines him--who he is, how he thinks, and where he intends to take America and the world.
Immersed in exotic locales across four continents, best selling author Dinesh ’Souza races against time to find answers to Obama’s past and reveal where America will be in 2016. During this journey he discovers how Hope and Change became radically misunderstood, and identifies new flashpoints for hot wars in mankind’s greatest struggle. The journey moves quickly over the arc of the old colonial empires, into America’s empire of liberty, and we see the unfolding realignment of nations and the shape of the global future."
Source: http://2016themovie.com/press/downloads/2016-PressRelease_06-2012.pdf
The election is over. Results: Romney landslide.
Richard Schulte
4:44 am on Thursday, August 23, 2012
The Obama GM bail-out success story:
"Rattne